Opinion: ST Chamber defines goals for 2016
By Dave Jinkens
President Duane Wallace and the board of directors of the South Tahoe Chamber of Commerce held an all-day strategic and legislative planning session on Feb. 6 at the Best Western Station House Inn.
The board of directors held an extensive discussion of goals it wished to set for the organization and the legislative issues and concerns that need to be addressed by governmental bodies at all levels if we are to have a strong and viable economy that benefits all who live and work in our community. The South Tahoe Chamber of Commerce supports vigorous economic growth in the city limits and South Shore, new private-sector investment, and the retention and expansion of existing businesses in the community.
We look forward to a good year in 2016. The board’s legislative strategy will be a guide for chamber action in 2016 and the goals are clear and transparent. The board encourages positive and collaborative partnering opportunities with other community-minded organizations and community members. We want to build a strong local economy; foster the creation of good-paying jobs; respect the rights of the existing business owners and operators and residents (i.e. homeowners and renters); foster and develop opportunities for community success; and help and support initiatives that create a bright future for all who live and work here. We want to grow the economy not the local tax burden. We want change that makes a positive difference for all those who live and work here, and we need the help and support of elected and appointed leaders and the community to do so.
The Legislative Strategy
• Airport: Support efforts that recognize the Lake Tahoe Airport as a vital regional and local transportation resource. It is a connector between the Tahoe basin and the U.S. Transportation System. It is an economic engine for the South Shore and non-aviation lands at the airport should be made available for economic growth opportunities to help our local economy, promote job growth and diversification and broaden the city’s tax base.
• Recognize as well that the airport provides very high safety and emergency value to our community in a crisis situation.
• Support the idea of the return of commercial air service to South Lake Tahoe without burdening local taxpayers or businesses.
· Arts Committee: Form and organize an arts committee and develop an arts plan. Seek City Council support for plan implementation.
• Building and Permitting: Urge the adoption of regulations, policies, and fee structures that encourage and make it easier and less expensive for people to remodel and repair their homes and businesses. Streamline and expedite the processing of building permits and plan checks.
• Business Friendly Rules: Encourage and support timely city government initiatives and processes that update and streamline city codes and policies to promote the success and expansion of existing businesses citywide and protect existing city businesses. Ask that city and county governments weigh new rules and regulations against their impact on the success of the existing business community.
• Caltrans Road Repairs/Closures: Encourage and support continued work by Caltrans to repair and improve highways serving the Lake Tahoe Basin and the South Shore. Ensure that any proposed highway closures needed provide adequate alternate routes to minimize negative impacts on the business community.
• Campaign Contributions to City Elections/Full Disclosure: Urge adoption by city government or by the public of full and complete campaign disclosure information and donation from all sources to candidates for City Council whether made by individuals, political action committees or businesses in state or out-of-state in order to create an open and transparent municipal election process.
• Charitable Raffle: Support changes in state law to allow a 50/50 formula for the operation of charitable raffles to encourage local charitable giving as was provided to professional sports teams in 2015 (i.e. by SB549).
• Collaborate with Other Organizations: Endeavor and work toward ways to support and cooperate with other business and charitable organizations that are working for the betterment of the entire community and in ways consistent with adopted South Tahoe Chamber goals and strategies.
• Cross Lake Ferry: Support in “concept” the Tahoe Transportation District to develop a cross-lake year-round ferry system between the North and South shores. The ferry would be an alternative to the vehicle to move people around the lake throughout the entire year. Examine the option of creating an auto-carrying ferry. Support funding from federal and state sources for capital costs and operations with no burden to the local taxpayer.
• Economic Development Corporation: Evaluate the feasibility of forming a local economic development and/or community development corporation to assist local businesses and grow the local economy and promote the creation of quality and attractive workforce housing using state and federal grant seed money and private-sector donations.
• Fees, Charges and Taxes: Oppose increases in fees, charges, and taxes by any governmental agency during these times that are found to be detrimental to business owners and operators and the general public. Grow the tax base instead of the tax burden. Advocate for policymakers to have prepared an unbiased economic impact statement be made before new fees, taxes, and charges are proposed. Ensure that fees assessed by local governments do not exceed the cost to provide the service.
• Housing: Support initiatives to encourage the availability of safe, sanitary, and quality workforce housing in the City limits without burdening local taxpayers and identify federal and state resources to preserve and upgrade existing housing. Urge all permitting agencies to come together around the goal of significantly streamlining the process for affordable rental housing including finding ways to turn older motels into nice conversions of two-bedroom units.
• Lighting: Support in “concept” the installation of city street lighting in the Y area to promote the safe passage of pedestrians, encourage walking and biking, and promoting local businesses;
• Loop Road: Advocate for and insist on a complete and unbiased disclosure of all environmental, housing, resident and economic impacts of the proposed loop road project on the city of South Lake Tahoe before decisions are made to give project approval. Determine if the proposed project is consistent with the city General Plan and adopted Housing Element. Provide specific and complete written answers to questions posed on behalf of the South Tahoe Chamber of Commerce and the community in regard to project impacts.
• Meyers Area Plan: Advocate for a complete, scientifically sound, transparent, and unbiased survey of all Meyers residents and parties before adoption of a Meyers Area Plan by local and regional governments.
• South Y Community Plan: Support efforts to identify reasonably and responsible and economically sound ways to implement improvements to the Y area in a business-friendly manner. Don’t let the new Y plan sit on a shelf.
We look forward to working with all community-minded organizations to make South Lake Tahoe and the South Shore the best that it can be for all those who live and work here.
Dave Jinkens is the Government Affairs co-chair for the South Tahoe Chamber of Commerce.
Since you brought up the Airport, what happened to the Air Show? It was one of the most successful events for a very long time and provided an affordable experience for many of our residents and visitors. Several of our shows had attendance close to 20,000 people. The City “took it over”
and it is now a memory. Is there any answer or accounting of why that is the case?
Mr Jinkens,
That’s a really long list! Maybe it was missed but The Hole wasn’t on your list.
Is there an update available on that situation?
This is a nice list of things to do but they are not defined by overall goals and strategy. But a nice list.
Robin Smith, my family owned the Driftwood Lodge for over 30 years. My family and several other original property and business owners lost a combined six to eight million dollars, because of the city ignoring its own rules and regulations with the “hole.” Their disregard for protecting the community and original property owners helped create the “hole.” No one within the city has ever been held accountable for any of their actions.
Mr. Jinkens would never discuss the “hole” because he was part of a what many of us considered a “back room” deal in 2007 along with several other individuals. An indemnity agreement with Jinkens signature was never made public in 2007. These other individuals are still involved in our community. Several of us original property owners would never have done our deal with the Randy Lane/Lew Feldman group had we known of this so called “back room” deal.
Current and former city council members have never shown any interest in a full and complete investigation of what happened back in 2007. Nancy Kerry has never shown any interest in helping the original property owners, nor investigating what went wrong. Are they afraid of what they may uncover? The current council still could care less about correcting mistakes of the past and helping us original property owners get the money we are owed.
Well Mr. Jinkens, how about telling the community of your involvement in the so called “back room” deal. You get to be a prominent and involved member in our community, while many original property and business owners are thrown under the bus by the city and face financial devastation.
How about it Mr. Jinkens, isn’t it time to clear your name in this horrible chapter in the city’s history. Why not use this public forum to tell the community your side of the story.
Rick, In 1989, Richard Hodge filed for BK after getting 15 million worth of land from the city. Before they filed they encumbered the property for apx. 15 million and ran with it. History does repeat itself, you can look forward to it happing again with the Loop Road!!!!
Something needs to be done…that’s pretty awful stuff.
B Gorman said last week when questioned about the Chambers position about the loop road she “doubted” the chamber would need to take a ‘position’ as she ‘doubted’ that it would get on the ballot!
Bruce Grego, Bill Crawford, John Cefalu and Laurel Ames are making a petition to put this to the voters.
I wondered on one of these comments recently why she would say something like that.