Digging for Washoe artifacts delays Sawmill bike path
By Kathryn Reed
Cultural resources belonging to the Washoe Indians have delayed construction of the extension of the Sawmill Bike Trail for at least one year.
The Washoe summered in Lake Tahoe and fished in the Upper Truckee River. Their presence is throughout the South Shore.
El Dorado County officials, the ones behind the trail project, are involving the Washoe in every step. They have met at the site and other places to ensure everyone’s interests are addressed.
The people that make the rules don’t seem to care this area has been disturbed for years, that cars drive on it every day and snowplows regularly traverse it.
Nor do the feds care the soil is compacted and much of the area covered in asphalt. Cultural deposits will be sought about 1-foot deep.
In the odd way projects get funding, not every holder of the checkbook would have required the level of research currently being undertaken. Because it’s federal dollars funding the bulk of the project the National Environmental Policy Act must be followed. This means looking for sensitive cultural resources.
Completion of the NEPA study is also required to obtain some of the rights-of-way. Easements from California State Parks, California Tahoe Conservancy, U.S. Forest Service and private landowners will need to be secured.
“We hope to have a draft work plan to Caltrans (this) week. Then we can conduct the field work,” said Brendan Ferry, senior planner with the county’s Department of Transportation. “If something is found, it’s a whole other story. If there’s a burial ground, it’s a major issue. Hopefully, nothing is found.”
If California’s financial situation weren’t so bleak, the California Tahoe Conservancy would have paid for the two miles of trail. But the CTC’s cash flow is at a trickle and had to give up on this project.
The county is getting Federal Highway Administration money that is being passed through to Caltrans and then to the county. Caltrans is pulling cash from its Congestion Mitigation for Air Quality fund.
The project, which was supposed to be done this summer, could start next summer. It will be broken into two phases. The first will go from Lake Tahoe Boulevard to Echo View Estates. The second goes from Echo View to Highway 50 to connect with the bike trail bridge that was completed last summer.
“We really want to get this project built for the community. It will be nice when we can link Meyers to the Y,” Ferry said.
The project could cost close to $3 million.
Connecting the Class 1 trail to the bridge will be an engineering feat because of the wetlands in the area and the stilt house on the corner of Sawmill Road and Highway 50.
“We will need to build a retaining wall. We can do it, but it will be expensive,” Ferry said.
He said at one time the CTC was looking at buying the corner lot. That would have made securing easements easier and possibly allowed for a different design.
“It is 8-feet-wide with shoulders, fences, drainage, culverts, rock-lined channels. The design is fairly detailed. We have the design basically done,” Ferry said. “We were ready to build it this year. We are just running into paperwork issues.”
Ferry said by late August or early September a decision should be made about starting the trail in summer 2011.
What was the reason for not going down highway 50 instead? It seems a long way around just to get to the Y through Indian country. Next thing you know they’ll be tearing out LTB for a bike path. Your hard work in tax dollars spent to build and tear out pavement.
There is currently no good way to cross 50 where the path ends at Sawmill. It’s surprising that this apparently wasn’t addressed during planning.
I would also like to hear an update about the long delayed bike path from the old Elk’s Club towards the college.
Actually there was a good way down 50 to at least the Airport and then down the side road and it would have tied into the existing Y bike paths. When CalTrans built all thoseretention ponds on 50 before the airport and alongside the old Sunset Ranch, which taxpayers own through the Conservancy, They could have built the path at the same time on the other side of the ponds as we own the land anyway, brought it through the Airport and then go through the meadow alongside the Airport and connect with the side street Kyburz to E then down Melba by the Campground where the bike path links up with the city. I have brought this up in the past and it fell on deaf ears because I am “Skibum” and I didn’t know what I was talking about. I even tied it in with calTrans, The City and County for funding but I wasn’t a “paid” consultant.
It makes no sense at all to build a path to the Y via sawmill pond! who wants to go so far out of the way to get to the Y? Yes skibum, others , myself included, asked and asked CTC and caltrans to work together on one trail down hwy 50 past the airport. It would connect with trails near the Y and also cross the truckee river north of the airport on the current bridge, now owned by the conservancy, and connect to the future trail from Meyers, yes the CTC will build another trail from Meyers (the multiuse trail that will go to stateline) on the opposite side of hwy 50 from where caltrans built. What a mess, caltrans blowing our tax dollars because they are too stubborn to change and work with CTC for all our benefit. And now the Indians are holding up construction. Maybe that could be a good thing, give us one last chance to get caltrans to pull it’s head out of the dark and work with CTC.
Kae … thanks again for another great story. I think I’m done reading comments however. So much negativity.
Wit, get your bubble brain out there and bring a shovel to solve the negativity.
I think there is more to a bike path than the shortest path between two points. A bike path is about transportation and experience. It provides a transportation point, but also provides an experience that is enjoyable in itself. With that in mind, would you want to ride right next to Hwy. 50, enjoying the sound of traffic and the lovely industrial complexes along the way, or a ride next to sawmill, with way less traffic and next to the State park lands (with access in as well)? Yes it might take you another 5-10 minutes to ride that way to the Y, (I timed both) but would it be a more enjoyable ride?
A bike path to LTB will also provide some trail access to the trail system around Tahoe Mountain. It will also provide a better experience for our visitors, which is an economic factor. Remember that not all bike access is for local commute only.
Yes, it is more expensive and in today’s economy it is a tough call. But down the road, I think it will be a better piece in our bike friendly basin.
Good comments all. I think Dave makes a good point about the aesthetic value of the quieter and more scenic route along Sawmill but I also think that Clatrans should have accommodated serious commuters and distance riders by including a regulation bike lane when they did the water quality / drainage improvements on that section of 50/89. Yet another missed opportunity of the many over the past decade. NDOT and, at the time, TRPA, really dropped the ball when the east shore bin wall project was done several years ago. We still have many dangerously narrow sections and those wheel grabbing, rim bending, flat producing drainage grates on a long stretch of Hwy. 50. The entire road was being redone and NDOT lied to the bike community when they stated in writing “All ASHTO standards for bicycles will be included”. I’m still pissed about that.
Hopefully the CTC’s Greenway project from Elks Club to Van Sicle Park will get done before too much longer……