THIS IS AN ARCHIVE OF LAKE TAHOE NEWS, WHICH WAS OPERATIONAL FROM 2009-2018. IT IS FREELY AVAILABLE FOR RESEARCH. THE WEBSITE IS NO LONGER UPDATED WITH NEW ARTICLES.

Camp Richardson trails on target for complete make-over


image_pdfimage_print

By Kathryn Reed

Pedaling around Camp Richardson could be a drastically different experience in the not so distant future.

Technically it’s called the Pope Baldwin National Recreation Trail, though most people who’ve been on this stretch of asphalt on the South Shore know it as the Camp Rich Trail.

Cycling at Camp Rich may change in the coming years. Photos/Kathryn Reed

Cycling at Camp Rich may change in the coming years. Photos/Kathryn Reed

With nearly 110,000 trips – that would be one-way – on it each year, it is the most highly used path in the Lake Tahoe Basin, according to trail surveys by the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency.

The U.S. Forest Service, the landowners, want to improve the 30-year-old route so it meets current standards, connects to other trails in the area and is moved away from Highway 89.

The American Association of State Highway Transportation Officials (AASHTO) defines how trails should be configured. To meet those standards the Camp Rich route needs to be moved back five feet from the highway or a vehicle barrier installed.

Creating a two-foot shoulder of dirt or aggregate material (not paved) is another criteria. The paved trail would be 10-feet wide.

Garrett Villanueva, assistant forest engineer, said his agency is looking at the American River Trail in the Sacramento area to see if that model would work in Tahoe. The separation of user types – cyclists, walkers, equestrians – functions well on that stretch of terrain.

“We have a lot more walkers on peak days than they see on the American River path which is why it might not work,” Villanueva said. “We are going to have to figure out what works from a regulatory and user standpoint as we go through the analysis process.”

The trail doesn't meet current standards because it is so close to Highway 89.

The trail doesn't meet current standards because it is so close to Highway 89.

Environmental documents for the project are expected to be out for public comment before Thanksgiving. It’s possible the final documents could be completed in March and a record of decision by June. Ground breaking could be in 2012.

Because a definitive plan has not been created the cost is unknown. Villanueva said the Forest Service plans to go after Southern Nevada Public Lands Management Act dollars.

“Right now there are a lot of routes on the map. Some will fall off because of wildlife or archaeological constraints or we won’t be able to get the coverage necessary,” Villanueva said.

He envisions some of the current dirt trails going and others becoming official routes.

Improvements are expected on both sides of the highway and along the unofficial trail paralleling Fallen Leaf Lake Road. The idea with the latter is to provide safe access for campers to get to the bike trail.

Linking the end of the bike route at Spring Creek, connecting with Cathedral Road, making the dam at Fallen Leaf Lake crossable without getting off the bike, connecting with Fallen Leaf Lake Road, and possibly going to where the highway is four lanes are all on the drawing board.

Some popular cross country trails may become official routes, too.

Improving winter parking is another goal of this plan. Currently people park at the gate for Baldwin Beach to trek in, which can be dangerous and does not accommodate the number of users who want to re-create there.

While Villanueva works on the bike routes, his colleagues are working on the South Shore Recreation Plan that includes upgrades to Camp Richardson.

“To a large degree it is in the same configuration it has been for 50 years,” Villanueva said of Camp Rich. “The uses have changed. We are coordinating plans.”

As plans go forward, the public will have opportunities to comment. When documents are released, they will be on the USFS website.

image_pdfimage_print

About author

This article was written by admin

Comments

Comments (6)
  1. dogwoman says - Posted: September 28, 2010

    It all sounds like nice ideas. Where’s the money coming from?

  2. h says - Posted: September 28, 2010

    THE PEOPLE THAT USE IT.CHARGE A PRICE FOR SOMETHING NICE.

  3. Perry R. Obray says - Posted: September 28, 2010

    That area has a lot of events and recreation enthusiast, great addition to an awesome place. Can only enhance more $s being spent there.

  4. dogwoman says - Posted: September 28, 2010

    I agree that it’s a great place to invest public funds. Before I moved up here I used that trail and I still like it, even though I avoid it on weekends. Widening it will be a really nice thing. SO many people use that trail, no doubt it’s the most popular trail on the lake!

  5. grannylou says - Posted: September 29, 2010

    How could we qualify for South Nevada Land Grand money when this is in California? That doesn’t make sense to me. It is an absolutely lovely idea. As they say, “the devil is in the details..” I ride my bike on those trails frequently and they are still in pretty good shape. With money so tight, I don’t know how we could qualify for funding at this point. It’s good to be planning ahead, though. Thanks…

  6. meyersbiker says - Posted: October 2, 2010

    It all sounds great, but I think the money would better be spent creating new trails,such as connecting Meyers to town, like I thought would happen with Measure S.