THIS IS AN ARCHIVE OF LAKE TAHOE NEWS, WHICH WAS OPERATIONAL FROM 2009-2018. IT IS FREELY AVAILABLE FOR RESEARCH. THE WEBSITE IS NO LONGER UPDATED WITH NEW ARTICLES.

Court: Lakeview Commons construction work must stop


image_pdfimage_print

By Kathryn Reed

South Lake Tahoe’s second stalled hole in the ground became a reality this week when a judge granted a construction firm’s injunction request to bring work at the Lakeview Commons project to a halt.

“What we’re seeking is to have the job awarded to us and we complete the work,” BJ Sullivan, president of Clark & Sullivan Construction, told Lake Tahoe News. In support of the Sparks company writ is the local Carpenters Union.

The dilapidated wall at El Dorado Beach will be destroyed and rebuilt. Photo/Kathryn Reed

The dilapidated wall at El Dorado Beach will be destroyed and rebuilt. Photo/Kathryn Reed

El Dorado County Superior Court Judge Steve Bailey signed the injunction Aug. 30 at 4pm. A hearing is scheduled for Sept. 17. It is not known if Bailey will make a decision that day.

Work may continue at the site through Friday to shore up erosion issues. Essentially, it is being winterized. Even though it was never going to be available to Labor Day crowds, the minimum three-week delay could affect locals and visitors next year. With it being directly across from Campground by the Lake, this beach and picnic area is a huge draw for campers.

“If it doesn’t go our way, I don’t know how it will play out,” Jim Marino, South Lake Tahoe assistant engineer, said. “July 15, 2011, it was supposed to be done. We were hoping to have it a little in advance for the July 4 weekend. The longer this plays out, the worse this is going to get (to meet the deadline.)”

It will be South Lake Tahoe’s responsibility to defend the bid process in court. It will be up to Clark & Sullivan’s attorney to prove the bid process for the multi-million project at El Dorado Beach was not fair.

The bid process became a bit convoluted this summer. On Aug. 3, the City Council voted 4-1 to award the nearly $4.5 million project to Reeve-Knight Construction out of Roseville. At that meeting Clark & Sullivan petitioned the bid award, saying their competitor’s numbers for subcontractor work v. in-house work were wrong. The Sparks firm was picked as the lower bidder in the first round that was subsequently quashed by the council in June.

The difference between the two firms’ bids the second time around was close to a half million dollars. Legally, the city has to pick the lowest responsive bidder. Responsive is the key word because even though Clark & Sullivan was not the low bidder, the company believes it was the most responsive.

(Calls to Reeve Knight’s CEO, president and VP of operations were not returned.)

Sullivan said the city “over-stepped” its responsibility by allowing Reeve Knight to adjust figures to meet the bid criteria.

To that, the city has repeatedly said, the clarifications being sought by the low bidder were minor.

Neither the city nor Clark & Sullivan has been in this predicament before, so authorities aren’t sure what to expect next. If the city prevails in court, it would like to use the remainder of the grading season, which ends Oct. 15, to get the foundation of the non-motorized boathouse in. If the city loses, it’s likely the site will be closed until May 1, when dirt can be moved again.

It’s possible the bid process could have to start from scratch, or one of the two firms involved will prevail.

(Whatever the outcome, the project is not destined to go the route of the stalled convention center — which hasn’t seen a construction worker on that property in years and remains mired in bankruptcy court for at least another 120 days per the judge’s ruling last week.)

Funding for the project is coming from the California Tahoe Conservancy. The state agency isn’t about to take sides as to which firm should do the work.

“This is a large project. The important thing is to do it right, do it well, on time and on budget,” said Peter Eichar, CTC associate environmental planner. “This (injunction) does not jeopardize Conservancy funding.”

Stopping work will hit the local economy. A number of the subcontractors were local. Supplies were being bought locally. Clark & Sullivan had not proposed to use the number of local subs that Reeve Knight is using.

Before Lake Tahoe News or Andrew Galicia knew about the injunction, he said the project was ahead of schedule. He runs GB General, an excavating firm based in South Tahoe since the 1950s.

It took less than two days to fell 52 trees. His company was supposed to do all the site work. Now his employees are without work.

What El Dorado Beach area will look like in summer 2011.

What El Dorado Beach area will look like in summer 2011.

Plans call for creating a terraced sitting area, revamped picnic/barbecue sites, access for all, storage for canoes/kayaks, rest rooms and overall upgrades of this stretch of shoreline. The rest of what once was called the 56-acreproject will be built in phases.

“If it turns out the way it’s supposed to, you really can use it,” Galicia said of the beach and barbecue areas.

image_pdfimage_print

About author

This article was written by admin

Comments

Comments (12)
  1. Local says - Posted: September 1, 2010

    Leave ot SLT City to screw thing up-incompetent!

  2. Amanda Adams says - Posted: September 1, 2010

    Why can’t they continue the work while the case is heard???

  3. dogwoman says - Posted: September 1, 2010

    The city is known for not paying companies it owes money to. I’d stop work too. Look at the whole bus company fiasco.
    What is WRONG with this city? It’s turning into a dead-beat bully.
    Dissolve it and turn it all over to the county. The city is obviously incapable of taking care of itself.

  4. Steve says - Posted: September 1, 2010

    Once again, valuable taxpayer dollars are having to be wasted defending the city’s incompetence and naivete. Citizens should demand better. Dissolve the city and stop this continued nonsense.

  5. Zgirl says - Posted: September 1, 2010

    This is absolutely ridiculous. First they start right before Labor Day – forget about visitors wanting to come see the fireworks…now they have to stop right as it is a giant mess. I am embarrassed for how this city looks right now. How typical yet still so infuriating.

  6. Careaboutthecommunity says - Posted: September 1, 2010

    It seems like one needs to be very careful about fairness, whether it be between your own children, or huge companies. Transparency and openness needs to be in play, as well as objectivity.

    To me, it sounds like they leaned towards the one company, and tried hard to make it work for them, maybe because they liked them personally better, or they thought they would provide more jobs for locals, or even because it was a California company VS a Nevada one, or it could just be a frivolous lawsuit, by a desperate company, in a poor economy?

  7. Alex Campbell says - Posted: September 1, 2010

    What does contractor Hal Cole say about the bid process ????
    You might ask Tom Davis the same question.

  8. tahoepaula says - Posted: September 1, 2010

    So who gets hurt? The citizens and visitors of Lake Tahoe, once again. This should have been resolved before ground was broken….why did the Sparks company wait until now? Both contractors involved aren’t local so they don’t have to live with the consequences.

    Cannot waste time throwing blame around…just get it solved QUICKLY and move on QUICKLY! It can’t sit there as is all winter. The City needs to get this resolved now….you owe it to your residents!

  9. h says - Posted: September 1, 2010

    city “over-stepped” its responsibility

    How many times have you heard the same song from our fearless leaders……….?

    This is a simple job,they make seem like we are sending a man to mars.

    When will we ever have good leadership, that gets the ball rolling in the right direction without all the MISHAPS THAT SEEM TO HAPPEN EVERY TIME THE CITY PICKS A COMANY OR PERSON FOR THE JOB.
    IT ALWAYS SEEMS TO COME BACK, “BITE THEM IN THE AZZ?”

  10. doubleblack says - Posted: September 1, 2010

    It is fun to watch the Three (Five) Stooges at their best. The “Amazing Dr. Clitterhouse” couldn’t have done better.
    Just business as usual with our outstanding city personnel.
    What’s next? Don’t ask.
    Just when you think it can’t get any worse, well you finish the sentence.

  11. Froggy says - Posted: September 1, 2010

    Bummer, just when I thought real change was occuring. I wonder though, why did the contractor wait so long to protest? Seems like a bid of a half million more is significant. Could be a real waste of taxpayers money to pay an additional half million for the same work. Couldn’t that money be used on other projects? Why are the Carpenters Union in this? Is this a stall simply to try and get a union shop on the project? If so, this is sad. Local guys like GB need the work just as much as some of the union guys. Everyone is losing on this one. Hope the Judge resolves this one quickly and lets the work continue.

  12. 40 year Resident says - Posted: September 1, 2010

    If the union is involved don’t think you’ll see a better job. Union does not mean a better quality produce. The locals that work on city and county projects put out a good produce. The up side of hiring local is the money stays here. Most outsiders have no vested interest in our community. Use the local suppliers and contractors first.