THIS IS AN ARCHIVE OF LAKE TAHOE NEWS, WHICH WAS OPERATIONAL FROM 2009-2018. IT IS FREELY AVAILABLE FOR RESEARCH. THE WEBSITE IS NO LONGER UPDATED WITH NEW ARTICLES.

Lane wants until 2013 to finish S. Tahoe convention center


image_pdfimage_print

By Kathryn Reed

Foreclosure. It is the word circulating around the bankrupt convention center project in South Lake Tahoe.

Randy Lane, principal with Lake Tahoe Development Community, wants the creditors to hold off a few more years.

“We are just asking for more time to figure things out and sell the property, which has not been well received by the city and one of the creditors,” Lane told Lake Tahoe News. “I don’t know that that is going forward. ”

A construction zone is the view Harveys' guests have had for years. Photo/Kathryn Reed

A construction zone is the view Harveys' guests have had for years. Photo/Kathryn Reed

He knows the banks are tired of waiting.

A hearing is scheduled for Oct. 5 in U.S. Bankruptcy Court in Sacramento to discuss Lane’s latest proposal. Besides wanting to wait 2½ more years, the filing lists how the various parties would be treated.

Lane wants to be given until May 2013 to begin filling in the hole.

The project near the state line and across from Heavenly Village would have been the largest construction project in the city’s history at more than $400 million. It was supposed to have two hotels, a convention center, retail and open space. Environmental impacts were highly lauded.

Projected revenue was heady. At the get-go developers were touting 180,000 visitors a year would pump $78 million into the South Shore economy.

When ground was broken in 2007 the first hotel was projected to open two years later. Instead, in October 2009 Lake Tahoe Development Company filed for bankruptcy.

The City Council at the time signed a contract without a performance bond in place. City officials let concrete be poured and rebar installed without a final map in place.

The significance of the latter is that it means 29 parcels have to be dealt with instead of one. If the property is foreclosed on, instead of getting back dirt, most investors are still tied together because of the foundation that was allowed to be put in without the Zephyr Cove-based firm having its finances all lined up to fund to project.

Patrick Enright, South Lake Tahoe city attorney, said the city is not backing Lane’s latest proposal.

“We are saying it is way too long and a bad idea. We are not going to have a hole there until 2013,” Enright said.

Lane does have until Dec. 21 to come up with a viable plan creditors will agree to. The bankruptcy judge keeps giving him extensions to have exclusive rights.

After that date a creditor or group of them could present a plan to the court or they could foreclose. El Dorado County could also foreclose to recoup the $2.45 million in property taxes Lane has not paid.

C.L. Raffety, county tax collector, did not return a call to discuss the county’s position.

Through the Teeter Law the county has been paying South Lake Tahoe its share of property taxes, which are higher with concrete and rebar compared to when businesses were operating on the 11-plus acres. The county, when all is said and done, will collect interest and penalties on the unpaid taxes.

If no plan comes out of bankruptcy court, the county has the first chance, over all the other creditors, to file for foreclosure. It would have to foreclose on all 29 parcels. People could come forward and pay the property taxes and then they would own the parcels. If no one comes forward, the county would own the property.

With Owens Financial owed nearly $29 million, it’s doubtful the firm would walk away from this project without getting a few pennies on the dollar. Much of the property City National owns has not been touched by construction workers, so it, too, is likely to want to recoup the land to compensate for the $7 million debt it’s owed.

image_pdfimage_print

About author

This article was written by admin

Comments

Comments (16)
  1. Steve Kubby says - Posted: September 27, 2010

    Outstanding report by Kathryn Reed. Thank you for researching, writing and publishing this detailed analysis.

  2. Local says - Posted: September 27, 2010

    Randy
    Take your time with this project, we have no other options anyway. Besides, we have moved forward with another failed redevelopment at the other end of town. That should move the spotlight away from the “hole.”
    Inept SLT City Council

  3. dogwoman says - Posted: September 27, 2010

    Good article. Personally, I think the man belongs in debtors’ prison for playing fast and loose with other people’s money and property. But with his connections, he seems to keep getting whatever he wants.

  4. 30yearlocal says - Posted: September 27, 2010

    “he knows the banks are tired of waiting”…what about the town Randy? I was against this project from the beginning and had discussions with his lawyer, Mr. Feldman…now I just want this fixed (along with many, many others)!

    I have heard rumblings that Lane’s project at Timber Cove Marina is moving forward but I hope not! He shouldn’t be allowed to demolish that hotel until he finishes everything else…the hole and the torn down hotel behind Raleys.

    Watchdogs….the city park beach behind Timber Cove. We need to make sure our city park isn’t taken away to house the timeshares!

  5. Steve says - Posted: September 27, 2010

    It is no wonder that El Dorado County is so leery of the City’s new redevelopment project. Burned once, shame on you; burned twice, shame on me.

  6. Tahoe Freedom Fighter says - Posted: September 27, 2010

    Why should Lane and his band of cronies on and off the City Council be treated any differently from the hundreds of other foreclosures of smaller properties within the City.
    The City staff and City Council failed to insure Mr Lane had the wherewithal to complete the project. Why should the owners of the 29 parcels or City residents be held hostage any longer? Does the City envision a local version of the TARP?
    Fill it in and let the individual property owners, either band together for a smaller project or develop their own property as they see fit. In the meantime there should be a moratorium on any project that Lane and his cronies are involved in!

  7. Careaboutthecommunity says - Posted: September 27, 2010

    I can’t believe Lane still has anything to do with this project.

  8. Tahoeadvocate says - Posted: September 27, 2010

    I thought that Lane’s exlusivity expired on June 2nd in bankrupcy court. This is the first report which said some judge extended it. Please name the judge. For him to extend exclusive rights to this developer who has hurt our city so badly is unforgivable.

  9. Garry Bowen says - Posted: September 27, 2010

    Had these folks known what they were doing in the first place, we would not be in the “twelfth of never” position we are now. Too bad no one noticed the “betting on the come” aspect of some salivating at the possibility of becoming local power brokers’ – to continued community downfall.

    Vail is probably not a viable option either, as they gave up on one of the two Marriotts’ early on – absent the financial strength . . .

    Unfortunately, the same banking mind-set now causing them to be licking their wounds at our expense (why lend when they already have TARP money?)will not touch this with any length pole.

    We can only hope that someone will have the wisdom to keep the overall parcel together, and not tear it up into 29 shreds…until a smart operator is found.

  10. Perry R. Obray says - Posted: September 27, 2010

    I got Monday September 27th 11:22 A.M. and Gary Bowen’s comment is posted at 1:02 P.M. 09/27/2010.

  11. farkworth says - Posted: September 27, 2010

    Having first moved to Lake Tahoe in 1963, I find it amazing that anyone is “surprised” at a Randy Lane project getting in trouble.

  12. h says - Posted: September 29, 2010

    This PROJECT DEAD…………Cover it back up!

  13. fpogen says - Posted: September 30, 2010

    Lane should not be allowed to do business here ever again. And as far as I know… he is still doing business here.
    *BOOT*

  14. tahoeannie says - Posted: October 5, 2010

    I sincerely hope that randy lane will not be allowed to start any more projects while the re-bar rust pit is still unsettled, and that never again will any commercial project be allowed to break ground without secured financing, i can not understand how permits we even issued, if the city council pushed approval through they should be held responsible as well. i feel so sorry for the people stuck with property taxes for a place they can’t use. but it’s never the greed merchants that clean up the mess. shame shame shame

  15. Kimberly says - Posted: February 7, 2011

    What if a new investor comes in to complete the project? We are all tired of looking at the hole, and certainly does not give a positive impression to visitors of our beautiful Lake Tahoe Basin!

  16. Steven says - Posted: February 7, 2011

    Kimberly, Randy Lane and his developement company are out. The hole has been foreclosed on. Big problem is there are something like 27 individual properties there that all must go thru the foreclosure process. Another hugh screw up by the city for not requiring the entire hole to be made into one property.
    Another investor/developer is what everyone is waiting for.

    By the way, does anyone know if Randy Lane’s first name is Gordon? The other day I saw 2 trustee sale notices(foreclosure)for a Gordon R. Lane. One property in the Zephyr Cove area and one in Al Tahoe(?) Together they totaled about $2 million!