THIS IS AN ARCHIVE OF LAKE TAHOE NEWS, WHICH WAS OPERATIONAL FROM 2009-2018. IT IS FREELY AVAILABLE FOR RESEARCH. THE WEBSITE IS NO LONGER UPDATED WITH NEW ARTICLES.

Building industry faces new fire regulations, green codes


image_pdfimage_print

By Jessie Marchesseau

California mandates new building codes every three years. 2011 is one of those years.

Beginning Jan. 1, South Lake Tahoe, Truckee and most of the rest of the state will be implementing some new standards.

“There’s gonna be grumbling with the mandated issues,” said Dave Walker, building official for South Lake Tahoe. “There’s gonna be a learning curve, but our contractors are good. They will adapt.”

Contractor Joe Stewart checks on the boiler at STHS's TADA building that is under construction. Photos/Jessie Marchesseau

Contractor Joe Stewart checks on the boiler at STHS's TADA building that is under construction. Photos/Jessie Marchesseau

Truckee has already hosted classes to bring local building professionals up-to-date on the new codes. South Lake Tahoe plans to offer some after the first of the year, as does the Sierra Green Building Association.

The most notable on this year’s list of building code changes are the ones having to do with fire sprinklers and the new California Green Building Standards Code, known as CALGreen.

Sprinkler systems

Fire sprinkler systems in homes are nothing new. They have been required in all new homes over 5,000 square feet since the last building code was implemented three years ago. But the state has decided to expand the code to include all new residential structures, regardless of square footage.

“It should provide for a safer community because sprinklers save lives,” said Gareth Harris, fire marshal for Lake Valley Fire Protection District.

According to the National Fire Protection Association, nearly 3,000 U.S. residents die in home fires every year. Harris said not one of those was in a home with functioning sprinklers and smoke alarms.

Contrary to common myths, he said, sprinklers do nowhere near the damage to a home that fire, smoke and water from a fire hose do. They can often detect and extinguish a fire when it is relatively small, and only the sprinkler in close proximity to the actual fire will activate, leaving the rest of the house dry. In fact, the NFPA reports that fire sprinklers reduce the average property loss from a fire by 71 percent.

Even though sprinklers can help significantly reduce property damage from a fire, Harris said the new regulations are “based on saving lives, not saving homes.”

For this reason, he is wholeheartedly behind the new regulation, but admits the added cost to building will make it tougher for builders. Contractor Tod Williamson of TW Construction in Meyers is well aware of this. He fears fewer people will want to build homes because of the additional financial burden.

“I don’t think it’s a good idea to tell you the truth,” Williamson said. “I think it’s a step in the wrong direction, considering the significant cost to the entire project, and they don’t offer significant protection for the money.”

Walker from his city office admitted it is definitely going to add to the cost of building. Even though prices have gone down in recent years, a sprinkler system will still add approximately $15,000 to the cost of building a home.

“The way I see it is anything that they come up with that makes it harder to build makes it harder for me to survive,” Williamson said.

Despite the increased cost, not all contractors are against the new regulations. Joe Stewart of SMC Contracting has been installing sprinkler systems in commercial and residential structures for years.

“They are really, really good. Sprinklers save lives,” he said. “When you’re living in wood houses, wood burns.”

He does note, however, that cold temperatures add to the difficulty of installing fire sprinkler systems in the Lake Tahoe area. If water is sitting in the lines, it could freeze, and the pipe could burst.

For this reason, a mix of 50 percent glycerin and 50 percent water is used in the lines. Harris said this glycerin is food-safe and nontoxic, so Tahoe residents do not have to worry about it leaching into the soil or contaminating the lake.

The Tahoe Regional Planning Agency is aware of the new code, but has chosen not to get involved. They do not generally review interior home issues and refer to the Environmental Protection Agency to make decisions on toxic chemicals inside homes.

Green building

Something TRPA does get involved with, however, is the environmental impact of structures and building. In fact, some of the things TRPA has been mandating for years are addressed in the new CALGreen code such as best management practices, or BMPs.

In addition to BMPs and storm water management, the new green building codes demand reduced water consumption, greater energy efficiency, material conservation and improved indoor air quality.

Walker said the air inside homes can be more toxic than the smog in downtown Los Angeles. The new code forces homeowners and contractors to acknowledge the amount of volatile organic compounds, or VOCs, released by building products.

“People are going to have to pay a little more attention to what they put in the interior of their homes because they want better indoor air,” he said.

Walker estimates the CALGreen codes will have less of a financial impact on the building process than the fire sprinkler mandate. But as a contractor, Stewart sees it differently.

“For us as a contractor, that’s going to have a larger impact,” he said. “There will be substantial upfront costs we’re forced to pay.”

Many of these costs will come from the added insulation and energy efficient windows, doors and heating systems. Construction waste management could also potentially add costs for contractors. The new code requires 50 percent of all waste on a construction site be recycled.

However, with a little planning ahead, the waste recycling could end up being one of the least intrusive aspects of the new CALGreen code, at least for local builders. South Tahoe Refuse already offers recycling services to all of its customers at no extra charge. The company will even track the percentage of waste recycled and provide evidence to the contractor, if they are notified and accounts are properly set up ahead of time.

California is the first state in the nation to mandate green building practices. With local entities such as TRPA and Lahontan Regional Water Quality Control Board already requiring many of these practices, adopting the CALGreen code may be easier for builders in the Lake Tahoe area than elsewhere in California.

“I believe Tahoe is going to feel less of a shock factor,” Stewart said, “simply because we’re already dealing with portions of it simply by building in Tahoe.”

(Click on photos to enlarge.)

image_pdfimage_print

About author

This article was written by admin

Comments

Comments (14)
  1. tahoeadvocate says - Posted: December 30, 2010

    Oh goody! More government in our homes.

  2. dogwoman says - Posted: December 30, 2010

    So much for affordable housing.
    It’s a good time to NOT build a house. Wait a couple of years till they realize the errors they’ve made and change the rules back to something more sensible. It happens all the time.

  3. TahoeEcology says - Posted: December 30, 2010

    Fire Sprinklers in all new homes??? – California is the poster child for over regulation and over taxation already –

    WOW –

    This too will hurt.

    Glad I left.

    Soon they will regulate toilet paper…

  4. Louis says - Posted: December 30, 2010

    Ummmm, Tahoe Ecology … I believe they already do regulate toilet paper, and more regulations are planned on TP something about the chemicals or bleach or dyes in the paper itself. Forgive me as I work off the top of my head.

  5. irony says - Posted: December 30, 2010

    Notice how the local fire marshall lumps sprinklers and smoke alarms in the same breath. Was this intentional? Why not break it out with the three appropriate catagories. How many victims lived in homes with functioning smoke alarms only, homes with sprinklers only, and the only catagory he does mention, both types of systems. Could it be he has an ulterior motive?
    Does Mr. Stewart have a vested interest in sprinklers as he makes his living installing them?
    Another fact, the government will not figure in the added cost in its CPI index, so there is no official increase in the cost of living.
    Are you folks getting to know what a jack boot feels like?
    Mr. Walker, the building department official, says contractors will adapt. Yes sir, they will adapt or else loose their livelihood.

  6. lou pierini says - Posted: December 30, 2010

    Decrease your budgets so we get a cost benefit from all these regs. you require of us. Insurance rates don’t go down with fire sprinklers and they might go up, cause they cause more damage than they prevent.

  7. dogwoman says - Posted: December 30, 2010

    Just more job security for the beaurocrats. Creating regulations and enforcing those regulations keep them relevant and employed. To the general public’s detriment.

  8. TahoeEcology says - Posted: December 31, 2010

    Louis,

    I meant regulate sheet usage … it was a joke – Mor&5n

    California is sooooo full of failure waiting to happen.

    This is a con-job that supports an industry with much clout. The Fire industry is biggggg stuff.

    Let’s face the important part – we are losing our freedom and quickly. At the same time we are killing the economic engines that built this great country.

    Oh well …

  9. Garry Bowen says - Posted: January 6, 2011

    Having not been involved in anything other than green building projects for over ten years now, it is safe to say that those who waited ’til government moved in the direction of “mandatory”, then complain some more, have never seen the writing on the wall, so I would question the motives of contractors in a community which has had ‘relaxed’ codes for decades – homes built with inadequate insulation, ‘jury-rigged’ wiring, materials obtained by ‘cutting corners’ than providing the best product they can.

    The above critique does not include sprinkler systems, however, as they are in the same mode as seat-belts: everyone has to have one, even though the odds are very slight of being in an accident. Makes better odds for the providers of such safeguards, than for the public, especially here, with the strong emphasis on defensible space & BMP’s as buffers.

    All other green materials also contribute to lessening fire danger (think solvents not used anymore), so I agree that sprinklers are overkill, and probably a waste of money, especially when you realize that in a lot of house fires, water causes more damage than the actual flames. Insurance companies take note.

    Green building was begun in a consensus-driven mode(never “mandatory”)over ten years ago, at which time the CEO of the NAHB (National Association of Home Builders, one of the nation’s largest)stated, at his own annual convention in Florida:
    “In ten years, if you’re not building green, you’ll be out of business”. . . to which, of course, some of his members paid no attention at all.He was off just a bit.

    The learning curve that Mr.Walker refers to, for most, should have started quite a while ago, but typical to those who only want to think of how cheaply they can get by, may have been waiting for this all to “blow over”.

    Those who went with the program soon realize how much better it is to have built something that actually performs well(i.e.,pride in craftmanship)versus how little they had to put in before getting their money back out – an all too common occurrence here.

    There is now enough evidence that there are many out there doing it right than to rely on those who simply want to be the lowest bidder, as if that’s all the consumer wants. That’s the primary reason for “mandatory”. . .

  10. dogwoman says - Posted: January 6, 2011

    You can implement all the government regulations you want, there will still be people who figure out ways around them. Folks in the trades know which builders do it well and which ones skirt the rules. How do they get away with it? Personally, I don’t know. I just know that some houses actually have to install bmps as they’re being built and some don’t. It certainly appears that palms are being greased somewhere along the line.
    And why do we pay inspectors for inspections that they don’t even do? New roof? The inspector does NOT go up a ladder and check that everything is nailed off correctly. Liability issues!
    It’s STILL not really about quality or environment. It’s all about “revenue.”

  11. Full Time says - Posted: January 6, 2011

    What if you want to do a remodel of your home, is this in the new codes too. I see more of this going on in town compared to new constuction, will fire regulations stop or slow this down as well, or you will see a lot of non permited projects. I did talk with an insurance company and they said that the fire portion of your home will go down about 20% with sprinklers but the total cost will go up 40% because of possible water damage, so insurance is more.

  12. hardtomakealivingintahoe says - Posted: January 6, 2011

    My T-pee still works fine AFTER 63 YEARS OF BAD WEATHER,FIRES,NEW WORLD ORDER OF BS codes.

    You want water in the ceiling with 30 below wind chill factors…I’ll loan you my canoe to make it to the street in case you can’t skate in.

    The think tank on this is pure Bull S –t!!

  13. lou pierini says - Posted: January 7, 2011

    Mr. Bowen are you aware of any studies that show sprinklers saves lives? I am aware of seat belt studies. And where is a cost benifit study?

  14. Garry Bowen says - Posted: January 8, 2011

    Mr.Pierini:

    I believe you might find some amid the archives of the Ca State Fire Marshal, as there was considerable emphasis done during the period of the Angora Fire Commission wirh regards to Chapter 7 of the CA building codes.

    For those who still think that this direction is a plot against their personal checkbook – it’s. not. Pay attention to the million acres + burned in and around southern CA just before and just after the Angora fire (3 ,000 acres, for perspective).

    That should help to understand better. . . that said, it also helps to say that CA. Division of Forestry & Fire is now known as simply CalFire, now given the global warming estimates (among others) as to where the priorities now lie. . .