THIS IS AN ARCHIVE OF LAKE TAHOE NEWS, WHICH WAS OPERATIONAL FROM 2009-2018. IT IS FREELY AVAILABLE FOR RESEARCH. THE WEBSITE IS NO LONGER UPDATED WITH NEW ARTICLES.

S. Lake alters nepotism policy; snowy paths OK this winter


image_pdfimage_print

By Kathryn Reed

South Lake Tahoe is inching toward recognizing it needs to do something regarding nepotism. But the bigger policy issue regarding employees will not be brought to the council until February or March.

A revision to the basic nepotism policy was before the council Dec. 14. What was altered is the code of ethics that had been passed in 1992.

slt logo“The resolution prohibits City Council members from appointing any of their relatives to a City Commission or to the position of City Manager or City Attorney. The Resolution does not affect the employment, promotion, or retention of employees,” Deputy City Attorney Nira Feeley wrote in her staff report.

The council approved the revision 4-0, with Bruce Grego being absent for the entire meeting except for joining via teleconference to vote on the mayor and mayor pro tem.

Grego weighed-in on the subject via a letter he wrote that City Clerk Suzie Alessi read into the record. In part it said, “We should select individuals to participate in our local government based upon merit. Depriving certain individuals from participating in local government based upon their ‘relative’ status is no different than depriving such individual from participating based upon their race, national origin, religion, sexual preference, sex, age and the other bases of discrimination that we all reject.”

Grego’s wife, Geri, is on the Planning Commission. The adoption of this rule will prohibit her from being on it.

Councilwoman Claire Fortier and Mayor Hal Cole stated how perceptions of a pipeline of power or influence need to be avoided even if relatives believe they can act independently of the other.

Councilman Tom Davis relayed how his son wants to be on the Airport Commission, but will be denied that opportunity. The elder Davis is OK with that to adhere to the policy and the ideals of promoting more transparency within city hall.

Councilwoman Angela Swanson pointed out how there are plenty of other ways for relatives to be active in the community and have leadership roles other than by being on a city commission.

The issue of nepotism was brought up in the 2010 El Dorado County Grand Jury Report. It’s a topic the outgoing City Council and former city manager swept under the carpet.

Lake Tahoe News in July published an article about nepotism in the city. The effort to figure out who is related to whom has been difficult because the city will not turn that information over.

After LTN initially requested the information, Human Resources Director Janet Emmett sent an email to the related employees telling them about the request. That document is public information, but the city is not disclosing the full list of recipients.

When City Attorney Patrick Enright sent the email, he wrote, “Attached is a list of the bcc on the email that was provided to you. The ones redacted are mostly police officers who (sic) names were redacted under Penal Code section 832.8. There is one couple that has a ‘confidential marriage,’ which is specifically exempt as a Public Record.”

So, it is still unknown how many full-time, part-time or seasonal/temporary employees are related to one another. Just being related does not present a conflict. Current policy prohibits someone from supervising a relative. However, relatives in the workplace can present conflicts for other employees. That is the part that has yet to be addressed by the city and it supposed to be next year.

Although the seven bargaining units in the city don’t have to agree with what staff and eventually the council will vote on, they are being given the opportunity to review the policy before it becomes law. That is why it will be months before it sees the light of day.

“As to city employees, the city needs to meet and confer with the employee unions, which we are in the process of doing at this time. Staff is hopeful that in the next two months a comprehensive policy can be brought to the council,” Enright told Lake Tahoe News.

In other action Dec. 14:

• The council adopted the ordinance to mandate businesses clear their sidewalks of snow, but the start date was altered to Sept. 1, 2011, so outreach can be done to educate people. As originally written, the enforcement was to begin Jan. 1. The city ordinance puts some teeth into what already is state law.

• A fee increase per the 2007 franchise agreement with South Tahoe Refuse was approved 3-1, with Tom Davis voting no. Because it is a contractual item it really didn’t matter how the vote went. STR customers in the city limits will have rates go up 35 cents a month starting Jan. 1.

• Police Lt. Marty Hale was recognized for his years of service. He retires at the end of the month, though will continue on on a limited basis for the first six months of 2011. He was given a standing ovation.

• The three new councilmembers were sworn in, as were the city treasurer and city clerk.

image_pdfimage_print

About author

This article was written by admin

Comments

Comments (12)
  1. grannylu says - Posted: December 15, 2010

    The issue of businesses being responsible for shoveling snow off of their own property/sidewalks is easier said than done. What about property owned by absentee landlords or empty businesses? What about public lands owned by various agencies? This may create a hodge podge of shoveled and not shoveled areas along the hiway. The only way to have this done in a coordinated manner is with one or more agencies such as the City and Cal Trans doing it with their equipment. If you actually do a drive-by of hiway 50 from the Y to Stateline, you can readily see the irregularity of the properties, some with, some without sidewalks. This really does need further careful study by an ad hoc committee.

  2. Julie Threewit says - Posted: December 15, 2010

    It is amazing to me that snow removal has to be so complicated. It’s far too easy to come up with reasons NOT to do something. What would SLT look like if more folks came up solutions? Happy holidays and many thanks to the DOERS in this town. To all you Scrooges, bah humbug!

  3. Careaboutthecommunity says - Posted: December 15, 2010

    Thanks to the businesses, and agencies that already clear their sidewalks. It is very difficult and dangerous to navigate by foot through town in the winter, every little bit helps.

  4. Lisa Huard says - Posted: December 15, 2010

    Thank you to Marty Hale for all of his work and service to our community. The Huards wish you well and many, many years to follow your other passions. You’ve done a great job.

  5. TahoeKaren says - Posted: December 15, 2010

    Sidewalk clearing from the Y towards the airport should be a priority. Many mornings I have seen people walking in the traffic lanes because the sidewalks are totally buried. This is a highway, folks. Dangerous enough without having pedestrians added to the mix.
    I still have doubts and misgivings about responsibility and possible blame for slip and fall accidents. There are no perfect answers.

  6. 30yearlocal says - Posted: December 15, 2010

    It should be a no-brainer on shoveling. If you have clear parking lots and sidewalks, people will patronize your business. If you don’t have clear paths, they will not.

    So, lets say we want the walkway between American Gas and Denny’s cleared, who is responsible? There are no businesses after the muffler place…is that a Cal-Trans issue or a city issue? The walking area from Grocery Outlet and the Nickelodeon Motel is the same thing…no private property, so who is responsible?

    I think the City Council should appoint a committee to prepare the rules for next winter so everyone is on board and policy is set months before its an issue.

    And…thank you City Council for your new beginnings….best wishes!

  7. Parker says - Posted: December 15, 2010

    Well I stand corrected Councilman Davis! You voted against STR’s rate increase! I guess it’s the newcomers Fortier & Swanson that’ll be for the status quo?

  8. grannylu says - Posted: December 17, 2010

    Thank you, 30 year local! At least YOU get what I’m talking about. This needs to be a very coordinated effort so that people walking, and some in wheels chairs, can go the whole distance along hiway 50. Julie Threewit, I was NOT being negative, but see more that needs to be done in order to have it be successful. I am very much FOR cleared walkways!

  9. Careaboutthecommunity says - Posted: December 17, 2010

    As I walked around town today (doing some holiday shopping), what stuck out to me, as a weakness of our town, is the inability to stroll around a mountain town/village.

    When I have visited other mountain/ski towns, that is what I find enjoyable. the chance to walk, look around, stop in some shops, maybe grab a bite to eat, and just enjoying the overall exploring of this town that is new to me, or I have not visited in quite some time.

    I just don’t buy the liability issue if we created sidewalks, otherwise why would other towns do it? I’m sure there will always be people around who are looking to take the opportunity to sue, but I think we can take some precautions, so that they can never win a case. Like signage for one.

  10. grannylu says - Posted: December 18, 2010

    Careaboutthecommunity, you are sooo correct! We CAN and SHOULD make this happen, even though we have a long, long street. It would give consistency, continuity, access, safety AND attractiveness to South Lake Tahoe. It would show that we have pride in our community!

  11. Karen Borges says - Posted: December 24, 2010

    I would have to agree with “careaboutthecommunity.” Other communities have figured out snow removal. There must be a model that works that we can adopt.

  12. Skibum says - Posted: December 24, 2010

    I just got back from a road trip to Steamboat Springs Co and have been all over the country in the last few years at several Ski Resort towns and I have to say they just blow us away with tourist friendly. Their sidewalks are always clear, trees on the main streets lit up with lights and decorations and almost always a Free bus system. The one thing they have that we can’t seem to get is a real all Winter Christmas spirit where the town and resort work together for the good of the town. I am not saying that HV doesn’t work with us, they do a lot for this community. What I see is a lot of good people, projects and community focus all being done by several entities working against each other for the betterment of their small representation of their small section of this town. No one ever seems to bring it all together for the betterment of us all. We have two chambers and a visitors group, a multitude of agency’s to fight and for lack of a better term a series of dysfuntional City councils. I have been here only 36 years and what I see is a lack of total community commitment towards the future of our town. We really lack a history of cohesivness. It’s true we have gatherings and social events but the other towns also have a daily paper where one can go for information and news and did I mention a Free bus system? I am not sure what the answer is but I sure hope the new Council will work together and forcefully create change with openess and community involvement. MERRY CHRISTMAS TO ALL. Skibum. Ken Curtzwiler.