THIS IS AN ARCHIVE OF LAKE TAHOE NEWS, WHICH WAS OPERATIONAL FROM 2009-2018. IT IS FREELY AVAILABLE FOR RESEARCH. THE WEBSITE IS NO LONGER UPDATED WITH NEW ARTICLES.

South Tahoe employees consider workplace average


image_pdfimage_print

By Kathryn Reed

A C-plus – that’s the grade South Lake City employees gave their employer and overall work environment.

City Manager Tony O’Rourke is not surprised by the results of the survey 92 percent of the 198 employees took in early December. Results are being disseminated to staff this week, with directors having received the report late last week.

city logoOf the 72 questions, the one receiving the lowest overall rating was: City management considers the interest of employees when changes are made in the city that affects my work. Sixty-seven percent disagreed, while 5 percent agreed with the statement.

“Anything that received less than 50 percent needs addressing,” O’Rourke said.

He wants change to be a collaborative effort between staff and management.

What role his management style played into the results would be hard to ascertain. When the survey was taken Dec. 6-7 he had been at the helm for four months – enough time to influence opinions, not enough to be responsible for engrained beliefs/attitudes.

The firm doing the analysis wrote, “Particularly in these economic times, adequate staffing levels is an enormous challenge and rarely do we find organizations where employees feel the staffing is adequate. Limited staff and high demand for services can also mean the leadership time and attention required for effective two-way communication and inclusive decision making and collaboration across departments can wane. This ultimately affects morale and productivity as evident in the results of the assessment and reflected in the written comments.”

In the 45-year history of the city, no employee survey has been taken before. O’Rourke wants to use this one prepared by Alta Mesa Group as a benchmark. His plan to conduct a survey each year, see if weaknesses have been addressed and what new issues may need to be resolved.

“We need to treat employees as well as we treat the customers,” O’Rourke said. His mantra since Day 1 has been all about providing quality service, treating customers (aka the public) with respect.

The areas city employees had the highest remarks for were:

• I feel a high degree of responsibility for the work I do;

• I work in an environment that is free from drugs and alcohol;

• I have the skills and knowledge necessary to perform my job;

• I know what is expected of me in my job;

• The people in my work group work hard to do quality work;

• I have a great sense of personal satisfaction when I perform my job;

• Employees are treated equally regardless of race, national origin, age, gender, sexual preference, marital status, physical handicap, medical condition, veteran status, or religious affiliation.

The areas people had the lowest remarks for were:

• My department is adequately staffed;

• Suggestions for improvement are taken seriously;

• City management considers the interest of employees when changes are made in the city that affect my work;

• City management promotes a team environment within and among departments;

• City management sets attainable goals;

• In general, this organization is better to work for now than it was a year ago;

• City management genuinely cares about employees’ welfare.

How the 57 supervisors-managers responded compared to the 126 line employees was about the same. Usually management has a higher regard for the institution.

The consultant wrote, “A focus on communication, leadership and citywide policy issues amongst city managers and supervisors may create a significant opportunity for improvement in the organization, and will likely be noticed by line employees.”

Underlining the issue with communication is the fact 75 percent of employees say they understand issues the city faces, but only 19 percent trust what the city tells them.

Only 12 percent believe management takes their suggestions seriously. Twenty-one percent feel comfortable saying what they think.

For the question: City policies and standards are applied consistently to all employees – 57 percent disagreed and 16 percent agreed.

The City Council on Jan. 25 will have this survey and the community survey at its disposal while discussing the strategic plan.

“The council will have to prioritize services,” O’Rourke said. “I want the process to be public and transparent. It needs to be tied to action plans and assessments.”

image_pdfimage_print

About author

This article was written by admin

Comments

Comments (10)
  1. dryclean says - Posted: January 19, 2011

    The following observation is now the norm in most all large organizations. The way out is to staff (which is not really feasible given city budget issues) or to start to trust your staff more to do their jobs. Less meetings, less of management instilling fear which causes more Protect Your Butt actions, more transparency in communications, and a thank you and how are you doing once in a while which makes communication more comfortable amongst employees and employers.

    The firm doing the analysis wrote, “Particularly in these economic times, adequate staffing levels is an enormous challenge and rarely do we find organizations where employees feel the staffing is adequate. Limited staff and high demand for services can also mean the leadership time and attention required for effective two-way communication and inclusive decision making and collaboration across departments can wane. This ultimately affects morale and productivity as evident in the results of the assessment and reflected in the written comments.”

  2. HARDtoMAKEaLIVINGinTAHOE says - Posted: January 19, 2011

    The City Council on Jan. 25 will have this survey and the community survey at its disposal while discussing the strategic plan.

    There is no strategic plan,more less try put on a pair socks that match, drive out to the planless airport,kill time,end of story.
    City Manager Tony O’Rourke needs to get to work on real city problems forget all the rocket science BS!

  3. Tahoan25 says - Posted: January 19, 2011

    They also sent a survey out to the citizens. A random polling. I didn’t get one – who did?

  4. Tom Wendell says - Posted: January 19, 2011

    I got not one but 2 surveys. When I didn’t fill the first one out quickly enough, I got a second one requesting that only one be returned. I did just that. I was glad to see several questions about the state of our transportation system including: sidewalks, bike paths/lanes, condition of the streets and timing of the stop lights (a real point of irritation for me). Cut Mr. O’Rourke some slack HTMALIT, he took on a job with a city in disarry knowing it would be tough. Let’s see what happens over the next year.

  5. HARDtoMAKEaLIVINGinTAHOE says - Posted: January 19, 2011

    Right Spokey,We wouldn’t want alarm the rest of the sleeping Directors..You know Spokey, when your on a Salary, there’s no need to Hurry, Right?
    “THERE’S ALWAYS TOMMOROW”

  6. lou pierini says - Posted: January 19, 2011

    It seems that people that work for the public, i.e. city, stpud, county, and state and federal agencies, receive pay and benifits beyond what private sector employees receive. Having said that, it seems that these employees, over 50%, don’t like their workplace. These people have a job and options, so whats the problem compared to the 15% plus unemployed in the area, or the redevelopment area employees who

  7. lou pierini says - Posted: January 19, 2011

    It seems that people that work for the public, i.e. city, stpud, county, and state and federal agencies, receive pay and benifits beyond what private sector employees receive. Having said that, it seems that these employees, over 50%, don’t like their workplace. These people have a job and options, so whats the problem compared to the 15% plus unemployed in the area, or the redevelopment area employees pay, which is less than the benifits the public employees receive?

  8. David Kurtzman says - Posted: January 20, 2011

    I received three survey forms and three reminders. I called the number on the form to see if I should fill one out since I am not a city resident. The city did not return the call.

    It appears that they just sent them out off the property tax roll and didn’t target homewoners. Also how did the reach renters?

    I will be interested to hear the outcome of the community survey but will be skeptical of just how representative it is.

  9. PubWorksTV says - Posted: January 20, 2011

    The survey that counts the most is the one where people vote with their feet.

    How many families have had their lifes work wiped out and chose to leave the area?

    the City, El Dorado county and the State have consioerd to make public employees rich at the expense of the private sector and then they snivel about their jobs.

    Here is my survey response.

    Good Bye.

    No bailout for you.