THIS IS AN ARCHIVE OF LAKE TAHOE NEWS, WHICH WAS OPERATIONAL FROM 2009-2018. IT IS FREELY AVAILABLE FOR RESEARCH. THE WEBSITE IS NO LONGER UPDATED WITH NEW ARTICLES.

Upper Truckee Marsh to temporarily ban dogs


image_pdfimage_print

By Kathryn Reed

“No dogs allowed” signs will soon be erected at the entrances of the Upper Truckee Marsh.

With 10 years of data recorded since the California Tahoe Conservancy bought the South Shore property for $10 million, the conclusion is wildlife and their habitat are not being protected.

This is because dogs are running off-leash. Only about 70 percent of people walking in the area leash their dogs, according to Dana Dapolito, CTC associate environmental planner.

The Upper Truckee Marsh will be dog-free for three months starting May 1. Photo/LTN May 2010

Upper Truckee Marsh will be dog-free for three months starting May 1. Photo/LTN May 2010

Because this site was acquired to enhance habitat, degrading it does not meet the standards for which it was purchased.

The closure of the 311-acre marsh/meadow to dogs will be from May 1 to July 31. This map details the area. People will still be able to access the area.

“This is not routine. It’s a reflection of the extraordinary value of this habitat,” CTC Deputy Director Ray Lacey told Lake Tahoe News. “We saw birds chased downed and eaten. It’s a little dangerous when you are in the business of resource protection and you let it go too far.”

The decision to ban dogs was first reported by Lake Tahoe News in July 2010 after the board made the decision.

Letters will be mailed next week to residents bordering the marsh in South Lake Tahoe to let them know about the closure and the reasoning behind it. CTC staff knows the three-month dog ban will not be popular. But they also said it may not be permanent.

Dapolito said, “If after the closure we see a significant increase in the leashes, we could bring to the board a recommendation during breeding season to allow dogs on leash.”

The time period of the ban is because this is when the birds are breeding. Dogs roaming free — which is never legally allowed — are not only attacking birds, but are also disturbing nesting areas. On top of that, some of the migratory birds going from one end of the earth to the other may not make it to their final destination if their energies are used up in Tahoe flying away from canines, CTC officials said.

This is not just any marsh. It is home to animals and plants not found elsewhere in Tahoe.

“It is the singular and most unique habitat in the Lake Tahoe Basin. That is why we singled this out of our 5,000 other properties,” Lacey explained.

The willow flycatcher – a songbird — was put on the federal endangered species list in 1997.

“Habitat destruction and degradation plus overgrazing by livestock are the major causes of population decline,” according to the Audubon Society.

This area of Tahoe was once grazed. It is a meadow once the water leaves via Trout Creek into Lake Tahoe.

The yellow warbler and yellow-headed blackbird are on the state list of endangered species.

Asked what would happen if dogs were left to do as they please, CTC wildlife biologist Adam Lewandowski said, “Some species would adjust, but this is unique habitat. (Others) are rare or threatened because they are not adaptive and have specific habitat area. So this is one of the only areas where they can survive.”

Although the Conservancy is more worried about protecting the animals and their habitat, two plants in this area are also of concern. This acreage has the largest growth of Tahoe yellow cress and is home to the rare American mannagrass.

The Conservancy has enlisted the help of El Dorado County Animal Control and Sheriff’s Office to police the area. They will be enforcing South Lake Tahoe city ordinance 18A-11J.

The first offense will be a warning and removal of the animal from the property. The second and subsequent offenses will involve money, though the CTC staff didn’t know how much.

An alternative for people wanting to walk their dogs in a natural environment during the ban is across the meadow at Cove East – another CTC property.

image_pdfimage_print

About author

This article was written by admin

Comments

Comments (11)
  1. Keep Tahoe Cool says - Posted: March 25, 2011

    Please…PICK UP YOUR DOG CRAP AND KEEP ANIMALS ON LEASH.

  2. Dee says - Posted: March 25, 2011

    So, the next step will to keep people out of there too – after all, their “footsteps” might disrupt some of the dirt. Those of us who walk our dogs in that area, on OR off leash, pick up after them. The very few that don’t should be run out of there anyway. What about the Coyotes that poop all over there all day and all night? Are you going to ban them?? And can YOU tell the difference between coyote poop and dog poop????

  3. Meeting attendee says - Posted: March 25, 2011

    Nice snowball argument Dee!

  4. tahogal says - Posted: March 25, 2011

    If you don’t know the difference between dog and coyote poop, you probably shouldn’t have a pet. Walking my dog on leash with a pickup bag in hand through several different forested and areas such as Cove East, I feel I must be the only one picking up. There is dog crap everywhere, and dogs come up and mess with my dog who is on leash. Be responsibile people or you’ll simply ruin it for all of us!!!!

  5. Jenny says - Posted: March 25, 2011

    The dog poop was so bad and upsetting to me one day that I took a 5 gallon bucket and shovel to East Cove. By the time I finished, the bucket was so heavy it hurt my arm to carry it. That is just plain disgusting.
    I walk the trail at East Cove to enjoy the beauty of the snow. I just cannot comprehend what type of person likes leaving dark piles of dog poop everywhere in this beautiful setting. Come on people! Does someone else have to be your conscience?

  6. lou pierini says - Posted: March 25, 2011

    Does this include police dogs?

  7. lou pierini says - Posted: March 25, 2011

    When you give power to the people you take away the rights of the individual, even if they are morons.

  8. Skibum says - Posted: March 26, 2011

    Why is it that dogs crap in their (mine) neighbors yard and driveway but not their own? Pick that up also or I will put bacon grease on it and watch your dog come back and eat it. I have a dog and I have enough respect to not allow hat. There are more garbage dogs than garbage Bears and I feel bad for them getting the rap all the time.

  9. Remember When says - Posted: March 26, 2011

    Have we lost site of the endangered species that the CTC was enacted to protect? Not to mention the nest sites of the migratory birds. Thurty years ago dogs ran “free” here in South Lake. Year by year the owners abuses have squeezed the “freedom” to Kiva beach and a couple of dog parks. The dogs are trainable and will follow their pack leader. Appearenty, the “entitled”dog owner has ruined it for all of us. The police don’t want to enforce and really can’t enforce these regulations. It would take a drag net team surrounding the area to catch these rabid pack leaders.
    Its up to us to help these individuals to see the light. Keeping a cool head and explaining the situation calmly will not only keep the peace, but they maybe will actually listen. Smile and show them the way.

  10. Christina says - Posted: March 31, 2011

    I live about a block away from one of the openings to the marsh and I am completely disgusted by the amount of dog crap that I see *everywhere*. And every day, I watch people take their dogs to the edge of the park and let them run off leash while they stand there (and usually smoke). Being a pet owner carries with it a basic responsibility to, not only your pets, the other people that you live among. SLT has a great dog park designated for just such an activity – so USE IT! It’s really too bad that a few inconsiderate Idiots ruin it for everybody else.

  11. nh says - Posted: April 4, 2011

    glad to see the “conversation” got back on target (altho i am definitely going to try the bacon grease trick!). it’s my understanding that the main reason the ctc bought the property was to protect the wildlife, not to provide another romping ground for dogs. AND if dog owners continue to have the same disregard for the signage at cove east as they do for the rules at upper truckee marsh, then all the ctc has done is move the problem from one wildlife habitate area to another. currently based on my observation as a walker in the cove east area, over 50% of folks at cove east do not even leash their dogs, and probably another 25% unleaseh their dogs AFTER they walk past the sign! if one points out the policy/signs–those dog owners get down right nasty….it’s all about their dog, not the habitate. utterly amazing.