Hwy. 50 project not total answer for what ails S. Tahoe
By Kathryn Reed
Even though Caltrans will break ground today on a $40 million project to improve water quality, the pipes that carry runoff into Lake Tahoe will continue to muck up the scenic corridor to keep it looking more like a Third World beach community than a world-class destination.
Billions of dollars have been spent and are slated to be spent on lake clarity. But that measurement has everything to do with what a dinner plate of sorts looks like and nothing to do with the near shore, which is where people swim and what they look at from a pier.
About a half dozen pipes from El Dorado Beach to Ski Run Marina bring untreated water into Lake Tahoe. All carry the oils and gunk from Highway 50, along with sediment from the mountain side of the road that runs through South Lake Tahoe. Some of that water carries fertilizer from Bijou Golf Course to the lake.
This is always the best time of year to see what flows into Tahoe because of the snowmelt. The high-mark for runoff is not likely to be reached until late May or early June, so the flow of water will continue at a good clip for at least another month.
Garbage is strewn about at some of these outflows. The outflow near Lakeshore Lodge and Spa is clogged because it is a grate. The water is a rusty orange-brown color. It flows east, discoloring the water all the way to Ski Run Marina. It goes out into the lake well past the end point of the pier at Lakeland Village.
Although the much-heralded Trout Creek to Ski Run Boulevard highway improvement project will help prevent some of the less desirable nutrients from reaching the lake, it won’t solve the entire problem.
Part of the issue is Caltrans does not own the pipes so the state agency is not replacing them. So, even if cleaner water flows from some of them, those unsightly discharge pipes will remain.
No official could tell Lake Tahoe News who owns all of the pipes, but the city of South Lake Tahoe is responsible for most.
Another issue is not all of the pipes carrying untreated water are part of the Highway 50 project.
“The outfall at Lakeview Commons is not getting any treatment at lake level. That is in the second phase of the project, of which there is no funding for,” said Jim Marino, capital improvement project manager for South Lake Tahoe. “Caltrans is providing all the pre-treatment facilities on the highway to clean up the water.”
(The contractor started mobilizing at Lakeview Commons near El Dorado Beach last week and expects to start work May 2 on phase one.)
“The Alta Mira (outflow) is a little unclear. There is some talk by the California Tahoe Conservancy to purchase those properties to expand Lakeview Commons and in that case that outfall,” Marino explained. “But right now it’s only getting pre-treatment on the highway so it should be cleaner, but the ugly look will probably stay.”
This area is at the east end of the pedestrian area where from the highway the lake is no longer visible.
Bijou project
There isn’t anything Lakeshore Lodge or Lakeland Village can do about the nasty water coming out of the pipe by the Bijou Center. General managers of both properties told Lake Tahoe News the Bijou erosion control project can’t start soon enough.
They will have to wait until 2013 – or later.
“That is a landmark project the city is undertaking. That will be a pump and treatment system,” Marino explained. “It will take the mucky stormwater out of the Bijou neighborhood and pump it back into the meadow and allow the meadow to discharge and cleanse it out. It’s a complex project.”
With 95 percent of the funding in place, the city hopes to start on it in two years.
Pat Ronan, who runs Lakeshore Lodge and Spa, said his guests will comment on the unsightly pipe, but his employees explain what it is and that it’s runoff starting at Heavenly Mountain Resort that winds up on the edge of his beach.
Although Jerry Bindel at Lakeland Village collects, treats and monitors the runoff from his property’s parking lots, he can’t stop the trail of orange water from flowing in front of his complex this time of year from the Bijou pipe.
Two pipes from his property carry water to the lake, though they are buried under the sand. Both are visible from the shore.
“The ones coming from our beach don’t (bother guests). We have some pretty strict guidelines on property to make sure nothing gets into the lake from our property,” Bindel said.
Permitting agencies
Lahontan Regional Water Quality Control Board and Tahoe Regional Planning Agency issued permits for the multi-year highway project that will bring improvements to both sides of Highway 50.
“The water, hopefully, coming out of them will be a lot cleaner, but it will still be an eyesore. I understand they look ugly,” Bud Amorfini, engineering geologist with Lahontan, said of the culverts.
Although detention basins are the optimal choice for treating stormwater runoff, that is not possible with the highway so close to the lake. That is why sand vaults and Delaware sand filters will be used.
But the goal, Amorfini said, is all the water in that section of the highway will be treated in some manner before it reaches Lake Tahoe. That will be a marked difference from what goes on today and has been allowed to happen for years.
With the Total Maximum Daily Load requirements passed last week by the state water board – which the Environmental Protection Agency must still sign-off on – this highway project will allow Caltrans to receive credit for reducing the amount of sediment reaching the lake.
This road project also qualifies as an Environmental Improvement Project under the oversight of TRPA.
“Highway 50 Trout Creek to Ski Run is an example of an area that needed full treatment, but which also needed roadwork, landscaping, pedestrian and bicycle improvements, so it naturally took a long time to plan and fund,” Jeff Cowen, TRPA spokesman, said. “The NEAT (Natural Environment As Treatment) plan lays out Caltrans projects to infiltrate all stormwater from its roads in the basin. They are accountable to that plan.”
Caltrans spokeswoman Deanna Shoopman said crews are bringing in equipment, putting up fencing and doing other staging work this week. Work that would interfere with traffic will not begin until after May 15 – when the first stage of the Amgen Tour de California bike race on the South Shore is over.
Improvements coming
The project begins on the west side of the city near the Trout Creek bridge by Meeks Lumber and goes to Ski Run Boulevard.
With it being a water quality project, much of the work is happening under the road surface where the drainage – and treatment – of runoff will occur.
Sidewalks, 6-foot shoulders (aka bike lanes), and new signals are part of the plans. Lighting will occur on the mountain (south) side of the highway. Landscaping on both sides will be provided. Walkways will adhere to American with Disabilities Act regulations.
This project has been in the works for more than a decade.
The plan is to time as much of the Lakeview Commons work into Caltrans’ schedule so the same areas of town are not torn up more than once.
Although the end product will be visually and environmentally better, it won’t be without inconveniences.
This is the preliminary schedule, though Caltrans may change things or have updates at today’s 1pm groundbreaking ceremony at Campground by the Lake:
• April 25: Contractor began mobilization.
• April 25 to May 13: Contractor will set up BMPs for TRPA permit and pre-grade inspection.
• May 1 to Oct. 15: Utilities will relocate infrastructure.
• May 17: Contractor begins phase 1.
• Phase 1: 2011 construction season — Trout Creek to Ski Run westbound (lake side) curb, gutter, and streetscape.
• Phase 2: 2012 construction season — Ski Run to Trout Creek eastbound (mountain side) curb, gutter, and streetscape.
• Phase 3 – 2013 construction season — full limits both directions – grind, pave and stripe.
Expect lane closures for the three years of work. The contractor will be working day and night until July 1. From July 1 to Labor Day, contractor will work nights, with limited daytime work.
(Click on photos to enlarge.)
Thanks for such a detailed article. It’s very disappointing to see these outflows into the lake.
Wow. Good article, thanks.
I wonder why the League to Save Lake Tahoe hasn’t been raising cain about this for years?
I have a question if anyone knows the answer: Since CalTrans is working on the lake side of the road this year are they touching the Harrison Street area? For several years I’ve heard it was a Cal Trans and TRPA issue (in front of Sprouts, Rude Bros, Rojos’s) because the dirt part of the street was being used for parking. Seems like a waste if they redo this area on Hwy 50 without touching Harrison, only to be torn apart in the future.
A group of engineers, biologists, hydrologists, and others who work for but disagree with the methods and approach used by the TRPA, USFS, ElDoCo, etc. formed a group called ” The Pipe Club”. They put out a calendar online for 2011 showing all the uncleaned, unsightly, unregulated outflows of waste water around the Lake. They disagree with the mandatory imposition of unproven methods to improve Lake water clarity (BMP’s) while dumping millions of gallons of untreated sediment laden water into the Lake which increase the TMDL exponentially.
Go Pipe Club! Please continue to provide some sanity from within these controlling entities.
We have neither the money, technology, nor the time to “clean up the mess”. Why not stop making it in the first place. Just tell Caltrans to stop sanding any roads with less than a 5% grade.
“Safety?” Nonsense. If we can’t learn to slow down when there is snow on the road then we should move out of town!
Almost 80 year local
Google; ” The 2011 Lake Tahoe Storm Drain Outfall Calendar” to view the Pipe Club Calendar.
Nice article, thanks.
The flimsy excuse for driveway BMP’s could be eliminated if serious and rigorous attention was paid to these main storm drains that empty directly into the lake.
Great article! I have always suspected that the mandatory BMPs are a waste of residents hard-earned money because the clarity of the lake has so much more to do with the outflow from these pipes and HWY 50 than from my completely flat yard that is three miles from the lake. I’d rather give the $6,000 it would cost to tear up my property and finish my BMPs to this project and really see some results!
Water quality projects are great!! We need them to protect what should be classified as one the natual wonders of the world.
But as long as we’re at it why not begin to change the future of So Shore. Bring in the bulldozers and level the lake side of the hwy from Al Tahoe to Lakeland village–arguably THE ugliest section of of town–2 blocks in. Then develop this whole area into community based projects. Close the west bound slow lane–permanently–and build a metro rail–monorail type–public transportation system all the way to Round Hill. Completely eliminate all vehicle traffic from this–lake–side of the hwy except for the Al Tahoe residential area where we eliminate all but the Lakeview and Los Angeles access points–diverting Los Angeles over to Lyons ave and a 4 way intersection. Then put in a bike road–not lane– with bridges over these 2 streets so that people could snowshoe, cross country ski or even snomobile in the winter. Close down the middle school and build a new one somewhere near the college or across from the sand pits and turn this whole area including Al Tahoe Elementary into a major sports complex. Take the bus garages and the Right Aid Center and build offices to house All the government agencies in town making this area where we already have the police and courts the “Government” center of town. Take the rest of the bulldozed area in Al Tahoe along with everything down Rufus Allen including the bijou center and turn all of this into the community center of town with a little theater/concert hall standing in place of the Bijou complex and a town center type of area in place of the Harrison ave eye sore. Then when we bulldoze the mountain side from Rufus to ski run–2 blocks in–except for Safeway and the condos at Rufus we build parking garages for Beach and ski, Lake land, Timber Cove and the neighboring condos with enclosed overpass access to these facilities. The remainder of this stretch can be rebuilt as shopping and restraunts w/ heated sidewalks for winter walkability and the east bound slow lane closed permanently.
Then we can continue the monorail from round hill down to the beach, from ski run up to the Heavenly Cal Lodge, from Al Tahoe to the Y, and all the way out to Camp Rich, and from the Y to the Airport and on out to Meyers. The bike road can also be finished all along the lake side of 50, tying to the camp rich trail, and also the other way on out to Meyers.
Then we can bulldoze both sides of 50 from Al Tahoe to the Y and make this the business district with offices and such leading to a major shopping mall complex at the Y that completly engulfs all 4 corners Over the hwy with theaters, shopping, food, and business offices. Of course with a parking garage and Raleys. Same goes for Wildwood to Friday ave on the mountain side with all this rebuilt into “quality” lodging. Then bulldoze the whole stateline–lake side–area all the way to the beach and create a beautiful walking only area with shops, food and whatever on down to the major resort on the edge of the lake and adjacent to Edgewood Golf Course and the rebuilt marina area and beach.
What else? Oh Yeah, since hwy 50 is now only one lane from Round Hill to the top of Echo Summit we need to give people incentive not to drive into town. Build a Giant parking garage at Sierra at Tahoe road and give big lodging discounts and unlimited free public transportation passes to all those who park here for the duration of their vacation.
This is the only way “South” Tahoe will ever have a chance of becoming the “Destination Resort” those that be are so desperate for. Otherwise wake up and go the opposite way billing So Shore the “Affordable” resort and let’s look at attracting the lower to middle class traveler. There’s still plenty of dollars to be had here as well, if done right. Oh Yeah. We also incorporate the whole of so shore into the City of SLT and boot the county out of here.
Just a thought!!
I think its great the City is working toward creative solutions on this project, but I personally feel that for the price tag of pumping and treating this stormwater, the City could buy nearly the entire Bijou center and restore a wetland. The cost to build, maintain and replace this system is very high… Wetlands need little maintenance… Mark Twain commented on this site a long time ago. To see the lake once again like he did at this site surely would be a treat not to mention meet project goals by removing pavement and restoring treatment.
Good Article. That is a cool calendar… Thanks Freedom Fighter….
Visionary, crazy dream you have there… Joe, cool thought… If you were to buy the Bijou center, now is the time… Restoration of the center is a good idea… Probably to late now though…
I, like so many others, did have the BMP’s done and also I am one of the lucky ones who now has a water meter. Not too many people do. So I pay more, while the other Tahoe owners can use as much water as they want without getting charged for water use. So I follow the rules as much as I can, because the lake is important to me. Look at it on a really clear day. Beautiful. I hope that this city can really take a good look at the city streets.
And realize that the city taxes and property taxes that are being paid every year by me and so many, can be used to fix our pot holes. Maybe when I get my new tires and my car realigned, I will send the bill to the city. Only kidding, but please find a way.
Interesting responses. . . Pipe Club to “Pipe Dreams”(Visionary). . .
1st, Mr. Hildinger is right in saying “better not to do it in the first place”, as that is a matter of conservation, in this case of water issues, as well as energy, as recent global sustainability efforts attest.
Toxicity is mostly in the materials and products we use, at a ‘parts per billion’ rate, making the “sediment” what we deal with that much more onerous.
My concern, with the mention of so many undeclared “owners” of the pipes, that current civil engineering and legalities will construct “more of the same”, which is not necessarily ‘better’ in watershed and aquifer terms.
The current emphasis on the term “stormwater runoff” came about from a Midwest municipal court case that went all the way to the Supreme Court (10-12 years), determining that the EPA did in fact have jurisdiction over a city’s cleaning of their water sources.
Due to Tahoe’s concerns for water clarity, along with citizens’ need for clean drinking water, this may indeed be the time to “condemn” the pipes mentioned, and put them under one authority, so we don’t end up with many different timespans for correction, overly dependent on the individual ‘owners’ budget & management skills.
However, coordination amongst agencies has never been a strong suit in this regard, which relates to the comment above about the “re-tearing up” that often occurs just a short time after a project is “finished”.
One outstanding example for now would be CalTrans, which ordinarily does not consider things like bike lanes (either Class 1 or 2)to be a part of a “water quality” project (as technically the Trout Creek to Ski Run project is), so maybe there is a glimmer of a better use of taxpayer money in adding value and coordination to what they’re about to do.
Harrison Avenue has been in limbo for a number of years, being earlier planned as more of a bike lane from El Dorado to Los Angeles Street as a “corridor” parallel to 50 – a project whose only part actually built was the parking lot just south of Lakeview.
F.Y.I: both Tahoe Beach & Ski and the Super 8 across the street (“Mo’s)(once a Ramada Inn) are infills of a watershed, but no one ever brings that up in terms of any “rehab” like Joe suggests.
The closest to that neighborhood that actually got done was at Wildwood, where there was a 100 unit motel that made way for the vegetated ‘wetland’ at that corner, which runs behind McDonald’s on the other side of the highway, exiting at the bottom of Ski Run marina.
I agree: good, well-researched article.
Tahoe Freedom Fighter, I am with you all the way. Why is a majority of the funding and attention going into all sorts of areas which are not directly improving lake clarity? (and in some cases probably making clarity much worse and there is data to back that up)
We do need to FIGHT, but first we must strategize. The funding is a huge issue, of course. Most of the funding has gone to places like the forest service’s creek restoration (to “stop” erosion which accounts for 4% of the total TMDL!!!? So disproportionate!)… And what they’re really doing is altering the watershed even more, which is going to produce more sediments and ultimately counter other positive efforts to improve clarity. For example, go up to Blackwood Canyon and check it out. Start asking questions… The community has the most power in this, we have to utilize our voice!
I want to know more about this Pipe Club… One of the pipes on their website is right in my neighborhood… it’s awful!
Thank you for this article and for this discussion!