THIS IS AN ARCHIVE OF LAKE TAHOE NEWS, WHICH WAS OPERATIONAL FROM 2009-2018. IT IS FREELY AVAILABLE FOR RESEARCH. THE WEBSITE IS NO LONGER UPDATED WITH NEW ARTICLES.

Opinion: Streamlining essential to refocus TRPA on regional issues


image_pdfimage_print

Publisher’s note: This is one in a series of columns from the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency.

By Joanne Marchetta

Much is said in commentary about the complicated regulatory environment at Lake Tahoe. For decades, environmental rules here have overlaid the usual building codes for public health and safety. The reason people came together in the 1980s to establish these environmental rules, was to stop harm to Lake Tahoe’s sensitive environment.

But TRPA and partner agencies discovered in the mid-1990s that regulation alone would not improve Lake Tahoe’s environment fully or fast enough. We know now, based on scientific studies, that a regulatory system that results in promoting the status quo where private properties become rundown leads to the continued degradation of the lake and our communities.

Joanne Marchetta

Joanne Marchetta

We can change this path. TRPA is updating ordinances and permitting processes to help property owners deliver good, environmentally beneficial projects. Since so many properties were built before we had conservation standards in place, there’s a great deal of what we call “environmental redevelopment” work to do. And this work can achieve multiple benefits—not just for the environment, but for the economic health and vitality of our local communities.

Last year, TRPA embraced a strategic plan built on four pillars to achieve our mission. This article is the first in a series describing the four strategic pillars and what they mean for you and the ecosystem in which we are privileged to live. This first part speaks to the importance of streamlining the Tahoe Basin’s regulatory processes, which have come to be known as a problem rather than the solution they need to be. Forthcoming are articles describing how we propose to

• Achieve accelerated environmental gain on the ground

• Improve the agency’s operational efficiency

• Engage the community and advance excellent customer service.

What we are doing to simplify our regulations is especially pertinent because of the bill recently introduced in the Nevada Legislature to withdraw Nevada from the Bi-State Tahoe Compact. According to senators sponsoring the bill, its impetus lies in the intrinsic differences and strained relationships between the states of California and Nevada. However, there is also an understandable amount of frustration and criticism directed at the complexity of the basin’s rules and processes to get a permit, allowing property owners to change the status quo. The introduction of this bill has provided an important opportunity for me to help educate legislators and members of the public on the dramatic shift TRPA has made recently to improve our performance in this area. I have also had the opportunity to outline the many external challenges that exist to the improvements TRPA is trying to make.

With our overarching mission to improve the lake’s water quality, the top priority for TRPA’s streamlining effort is to reformat and simplify the TRPA Code of Ordinances in a way that is illustrative and narrative so that any property owner or local building inspector can understand what’s called for and easily put it to use. A team of staff and consultants have already started this important work and so far, just through reorganization and consolidating redundancy, have found a way to reduce the weight of the document by more than a pound.

Converting all paper records to a more accessible electronic form is another streamlining directive on which we’re making progress. Having more records available online will help streamline real estate transactions and basic information searches. When a property owner wants to know how much land coverage is available or other practical information to plan a project, it should be easily accessible from a computer anywhere. These measures will be supported by bringing permit applications online to tie into the revised code of ordinances making all agency processes more transparent, accessible and understandable to the people who need to use them.

But perhaps a more fundamental shift, and one that will take greater resolve and support from partner agencies and conservation groups alike, is the effort to delegate more categories of residential and commercial permitting to your local building departments and to ultimately move TRPA back into the role of innovative, regional planner that was originally envisioned. TRPA needs to focus on partnerships, area-wide solutions, and multi-jurisdiction coordination to deliver quantum leaps in needed environmental improvement. Permits for a project in your back yard can be consolidated with permits from your local building department to simplify your experience. This ultimate streamlining move will not be easy. Where TRPA has already built strong partnerships with local governments to offer permit services on our behalf, we need to go further so that TRPA can focus on areas where science tells us much greater environmental gains are possible over the next several decades.

Shifting our emphasis to regional environmental goals and leaving residential projects to local governments will achieve far greater benefit for the lake’s environment than the cumbersome way we do our business today.

Change comes hard at Lake Tahoe and we’ll need community support to work through the opposition that may come from special interests. But TRPA can become the regional planning agency we once were. We can once again live up to our reputation on the world stage as a cutting-edge environmental leader. By becoming the very best at building regionwide partnerships to deliver environmental gain, we can help local communities build their own sustainable futures around a healthy, world-famous environment.

TRPA is taking a hard look at itself and has found that our problems are fixable, and I have set TRPA on a course to do just that. Take a closer look at our strategic plan online.

Until next time, thank you.

Joanne Marchetta is executive director of the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency.

image_pdfimage_print

About author

This article was written by admin

Comments

Comments (10)
  1. Steve Kubby says - Posted: April 15, 2011

    Joanne Marchetta seems like a sincere and dedicated individual who actually believes what she is saying. However, any eighth grade student can read the TRPA charter and determine that the TRPA does not have the authority it currently claims.

    Take a look at Article VI of the TRPA charter and you’ll see that its powers are supposed to be “general and regional in application,” leaving the writing and enforcement of specific and local ordinances to local jurisdictions like the City of South Lake Tahoe:

    “Whenever possible without diminishing the effectiveness of the regional plan, the ordinances, rules, regulations and policies shall be confined to matters which are general and regional in application, leaving to the jurisdiction of the respective States, counties and cities the enactment of specific and local ordinances, and rules, regulations and policies which conform to the regional plan.”

    What part of “whenever possible,” or “confined to matters which are general and regional,” or “leaving to the jurisdiction of… cities,” does the TRPA, or Joanne Marchetta, not understand?

    The elected officials of South Lake Tahoe have the legal authority to override the TRPA enforcement codes, to ignore its BMP requirements, and to tear up TRPA red tags, so long as the City Council is prepared to uphold the Constitution and protect its residents from such overregulation and illegal abuse.

  2. dumbfounded says - Posted: April 15, 2011

    Hopefully, the public will realize just how poorly the TRPA has lived up to it’s charter and will defund the agency. We will live within the Constitution with or without the government. It is sad that bureaucracy just cannot help itself from overreaching. Until they do, we will have to throw the baby out with the bathwater.

  3. john barleycorn says - Posted: April 15, 2011

    The only streamlining I would like to see is the TRPAZI put in front of a streamliner going full speed.

  4. Perry R. Obray says - Posted: April 15, 2011

    The above was to much reading this morning for me. That aside, can someone explain what the TRPA does to force evaluation of all new construction (not just buildings) to evaluate the carbon footprint (for lack of better explanation). This isn’t in response to global warming. The theory is any carbon footprint in effect is SMOG (this is an environmental issue, right?)! We live kinda in an isolated terrarium with our passes being above 7000 feet, and in essence wallowing in our waste and pretty much stuck with it. I’m guessing unless the world ends in 2012, done effectively, lowering our carbon footprint is actually cheaper on ongoing overhead, and health costs. Think outside the box, you might start/be a part of a trend for a better planet.

  5. Mike Bradford says - Posted: April 15, 2011

    It is dissappointing to see the limited knowledge regarding TRPA’s role, contributions, constraints and obstacles. I encourage everyone to attend a few Governing Board meetings, Advisory Planning Commission meetings and discuss with your elected Governing Board representative what the real issues are facing our community and TRPA. I think if you take the time to be directly informed and only slightly involved you will recognize TRPA is doing a good job balancing the environment (our Lake) and the residents’ well being. Certainly, there is room for improvement. But blowing up TRPA now is ultimately not be good for anyone. If you want to focus on the real problem look no futher than the League to Save Lake Tahoe.

  6. dumbfounded says - Posted: April 15, 2011

    Mike, great idea, but we can’t defund the “League to Save Lake Tahoe for a few Rich People”. Despite the good that the TRPA has done, they have completely destroyed the confidence that many had with government regulation through their arrogance and overreach. I have attended many TRPA meetings and have always come away with the impression that the outcome had been determined before the meeting. Reading the opinion piece above with all it’s politically correct language does not inspire hope. This same language has been used by TRPA for decades with little or no change. Any ideas how to combat the League?

  7. john barleycorn says - Posted: April 15, 2011

    Mike, Mussolini make the trains run on time. Whup de do.

  8. westshoreskier says - Posted: April 15, 2011

    The League to Save Lake Tahoe is the real problem in the basin. And right now they have the deepest pockets and thus the best lawyers. If we get rid of the TRPA, who’s going to have the resources to push through the needed redevelopment? On its own, SLT doesn’t stand a chance against the League.

  9. Applegator says - Posted: April 16, 2011

    “Streamlining” implies a few administrative tweaks. What is needed is some deep down soul searching. The future is in the hands of the board members, not the general public. If that small group cannot achieve an accommodation sufficient to stave off secession, the core problems will persist. As with the California budget, gimmicks and easy fixes (“streamlining”?) will not be enough in the long run.

  10. Satori says - Posted: April 20, 2011

    S. L. T. is now officially Sleepy Little Town, as in that state between waking and being fully awake (and ready to go).

    Streamlining will not help, absent knowing the next step beyond “doing the right thing” (itself already in serious jeopardy), that of “doing the thing right” (which can’t get out of the box).

    As they say in journalism, “comfort the afflicted, and afflict the comfortable”, but we as a society now even get that crossed up, as Tahoe is now about more comfort for the comfortable,while continuing to afflict the afflicted, which should be in the “Say it isn’t so” category, if we are ever to be a community.

    Everyone is so entrenched in their own way of thinking here that there is no room for thinking otherwise. Referring to the two sides of the same coin above, Tahoe is afflicted with GIGO (garbage in, garbage out), the seminal thought that you will never get something better out than what you put in.

    Quality counts, to not make Tahoe any further the brunt of jokes such as ‘Poverty with a View’. No matter how many times you may study it “scientifically” (at taxpayer expense) those studies will always be behind the last wave of stupidity. Japan now knows, all too well. . .

    With all of Tahoe’s beauty, nature cannot hold its’ own, even after millions of years on its’ own, without Man thinking they can somehow do it better,usually with a better ‘bottom line’ in mind.

    Even and especially agencies. . .

    Regulation is a function of poor design, but intransigence on all sides is pure human folly.

    That includes the side which says to abandon ship – for their part, the Captain and crew have to develop more serious ways to right the ship and turn it around, as they appear once again not to see the iceberg, therefore cannot see their way to maneuver around it to a better and more secure course for all aboard.

    The best they’ve been able to do is create economic doldrums (“take the wind out of the sails”), that part of human energy that wants and needs to do right, but is continually guided to go in the wrong direction, due to a faulty compass.

    “Magnetic” North must be replaced with True North if we are to navigate any Tahoe future at all beyond TODAY. . .