THIS IS AN ARCHIVE OF LAKE TAHOE NEWS, WHICH WAS OPERATIONAL FROM 2009-2018. IT IS FREELY AVAILABLE FOR RESEARCH. THE WEBSITE IS NO LONGER UPDATED WITH NEW ARTICLES.

Opinion: Education cuts shortchange future of all Californians


image_pdfimage_print

By Mark Paul

When pollsters ask, most of us say California is going in the wrong direction. We’ve been saying so, with the rare exception, for almost a decade. So we have to consider an unhappy possibility: California, after trekking off-course for so long, may have crossed over into unfamiliar and dangerous territory. Call it the State of the Dimming Dream.

Not everyone agrees, of course, on what’s wrong. To some of us, California remains a place of bloated government, rampant spending on the poor and punishingly high taxes. As is so often the case in a state where change is the only constant, the old stories lag behind the news and the numbers. A generation ago, when graybeards like me were starting out, California rivaled New York as a high-tax state. No more.

The top personal income tax rate is lower than when some fellow named Ronald Reagan was governor. The corporate tax has been cut and the code turned into a Swiss cheese of credits and exemptions. The estate tax has been abolished. Proposition 13 cut and capped property tax rates and limited reassessments. The vehicle license fee has been halved. The sales tax rate is higher but its yield has fallen because the items on which it is levied – mostly tangible goods – make up a declining slice of our consumption.

So it should be no surprise that the budget fight this year in Sacramento is not over whether state government will be big or small. It’s about whether the state government will be small or smaller.

Mark Paul, formerly deputy editorial page editor of the Sacramento Bee and deputy treasurer of California, is the co-author, with Joe Mathews, of “California Crackup: How Reform Broke the Golden State and How We Can Fix It.”

Read the whole story

image_pdfimage_print

About author

This article was written by admin

Comments

Comments (2)
  1. Where is the turnip truck says - Posted: June 18, 2011

    Either one will do, small or smaller. Unconscionably high pay and benefits for government workers are breaking the bank along with welfare and other costs for people illegally in this state.
    Kind of what you expect when you can bribe, oh excuse me, I meant contribute to politicians war chests who you then negociate your salary and benefits with.
    It is a sick joke that is eating the state alive from within and without.

  2. tahoeadvocate says - Posted: June 18, 2011

    Let’s shoot for smallest! No government entity, federal or state, should have more employees than the private sector. Subcontract services which the taxpayers decide they want their tax dollars to be spent on. Don’t hire government workers to provide them , just to manage subcontracts for them. That way the taxpayers can determine how much they want spent on any one thing and not get locked into a perpetual motion political machine like we are today with California employee unions.