THIS IS AN ARCHIVE OF LAKE TAHOE NEWS, WHICH WAS OPERATIONAL FROM 2009-2018. IT IS FREELY AVAILABLE FOR RESEARCH. THE WEBSITE IS NO LONGER UPDATED WITH NEW ARTICLES.

Opinion: Democrats are the real party of ‘no’


image_pdfimage_print

By Tom Del Beccaro

New York, New Jersey and California have a lot in common. They’re populous states with Democratic legislative majorities, high taxes and big deficits. The difference, however, is that the New York and New Jersey Democrats have enacted reforms while California Democrats remain the Party of No.

Earlier this year, New Jersey’s bond rating was downgraded by the S&P. New Jersey’s debt level and poorly funded pension system was the reason. According to Moody’s, New Jersey’s combined pension and long-term debt liabilities are more than 222 percent of its yearly revenue. New Jersey also has the nation’s highest tax rates. New York’s combined pension and long-term debt liabilities are more than 101 percent of existing revenue. It had a $10 billion deficit in 2011 and the second highest tax rates in the country. California’s combined pension and long-term debt liabilities are more than 166 percent of its revenue. We face annual budget deficits in excess of $15 billion and the highest tax rates in the West excluding Hawaii. One more thing in common: All three states have been dominated by Democrats for years.

Faced with dire balance sheets, Democrats in New York and New Jersey said yes to reform. New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo declared, “The old way of solving the problem was continuing to raise taxes on people. And we just can’t do that anymore.” The new way included reductions in state spending, salary freezes, cuts to education, reductions in state workers and, yes, even income and property tax relief with the help of Democrat votes in the New York Legislature.

The story line from New Jersey was similar. New Jersey’s Democrat-led Legislature required public workers to pay more for benefits. According to Democrat Louis Greenwald, a sponsor of the legislation, the bill brought “property tax relief,” made “benefits sustainable for the working families who rely on them and preserve collective bargaining rights for future negotiations. This protects both taxpayers and worker rights.”

Tom Del Beccaro is chairman of the California Republican Party.

Read the whole story

image_pdfimage_print

About author

This article was written by admin

Comments

Comments (8)
  1. PubWorksTV says - Posted: July 14, 2011

    Four decades of liberal decline and this is what you get.

    Any questions?

  2. Bob says - Posted: July 14, 2011

    We let both parties get away with wasting our tax dollars. They’re like a couple of old friends who blame the other for not getting where they should in life. We just watch like spectators – paying for the priviledge to hear them speak.

  3. PubWorksTV says - Posted: July 14, 2011

    People in both parties are corrupt, true.

    When conservitives identify them we run them out of office.

    When liberals find them they do their best to sheiks them.

    When people say both parties are the same they are contradicted by mountains of evidence in history.

    Flat out wrong.

    I am Tired of such nonsense.

  4. PubWorksTV says - Posted: July 14, 2011

    That should read liberals “shield them”

  5. Careaboutthecommunity says - Posted: July 14, 2011

    Bob, you hit the nail on the head. It’s to the politicians advantage to keep the citizens fighting within the 2 party system. They thrive by making us feel like we are so different from each other, when actually we pretty much want the same things out of life, and to be treated justly.

  6. dumbfounded says - Posted: July 14, 2011

    If you are still using labels like conservative and liberal, you are part of the problem.

  7. PubWorksTV says - Posted: July 15, 2011

    Dumbfounded,

    That makes no sense. It sounds like an empty statement a school teacher would make.

    Are you a teacher?

  8. Erika Toth says - Posted: July 16, 2011

    Just the same old blame game… while nothing gets done by anybody yet they continue to collect their very generous incomes and benefit packages. Why accept responsibility when you can blame somebody else instead?