THIS IS AN ARCHIVE OF LAKE TAHOE NEWS, WHICH WAS OPERATIONAL FROM 2009-2018. IT IS FREELY AVAILABLE FOR RESEARCH. THE WEBSITE IS NO LONGER UPDATED WITH NEW ARTICLES.

Heavenly taking strides to overhaul Cal Base Lodge


image_pdfimage_print

By Kathryn Reed

Heavenly Mountain Resort is in the process of having the soil composition for the California Base Lodge and parking lots be reclassified.

This is because a soil report the resort had done a year ago came back with a different analysis compared to what was recorded in the mid-1970s. Besides the soil difference, the latest study says the stream environmental zone at the resort is smaller than originally indicated.

The South Shore resort has long planned to revamp that area. A new lodge and other changes to the acreage are part of the master plan that was approved in 2007 by the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency and the U.S. Forest Service. Because this lodge and parking are not on Forest Service land that agency is not involved in the current talks.

Heavenly is inching forward with plans invovling the lodge at the base of Gunbarrel. Photo/LTN file

Heavenly is inching forward with plans invovling the lodge and land at the base of Gunbarrel. Photo/LTN file

TRPA, though, is the agency tasked with reclassifying land designations. A hearing about Heavenly’s desires to change things is slated for Sept. 29 at 2pm at TRPA’s Stateline headquarters. This is done before a hearings officer.

Mike Cavanaugh, the TRPA planner handling this situation, did not return multiple phone calls.

He is the one who signed the letter dated Sept. 15 that was sent to neighbors alerting them to the hearing about Heavenly’s request.

The staff report, which doesn’t have a name on it, recommends the hearing officer make the changes Heavenly is asking for.

“This is a step in the process, in the TRPA review process so we can move forward with future planning,” Russ Pecoraro, Heavenly’s spokesman, told Lake Tahoe News. “There may be some mitigation we need to plan for. We want to know what we are dealing with.”

He would not say if a time line exists for redeveloping the outdated lodge and making that entrance to the resort visually more appealing.

“Since it is a scientific prediction and not a verification, TRPA requires all land capability classes be verified on a parcel before a project is permitted. A land capability challenge is one of TRPA’s administrative mechanisms for correcting the land capability maps, which are based on the 1972 soil survey,” TRPA spokesman Jeff Cowen said. “Heavenly’s master plan is an approval of long range concepts, but not of the individual projects. Each project contained in Heavenly’s master plan needs to be permitted and fully reviewed as they come forward. Master plan areas don’t necessarily have all their land coverage verified prior to proposing a master plan.

“The California Base Lodge parcel never had its land capability verified and the applicant predicted they would need substantial soil testing and expert review, so they chose to forego the verification step and go directly to a land capability challenge, which includes soil boring, test pits, expert review and a public hearing.”

Since its creation in 1974 by the TRPA and USFS, the Bailey Land-Capability Classification is the system used to determine what can be built where in the Lake Tahoe Basin based on the soil.

The extensive document says, “For purposes of this study, land tolerance is used as the principal measure of capability. Land capability is in turn defined as the level of use an area can tolerate without sustaining permanent damage through erosion and other causes. Although capability classes are expressed as levels of tolerance, they are estimated by the degree to which potential hazards arising from improper use are absent. (The lower erosion hazard a soil has, the higher its capability rating for development.)”

In April 2008, Heavenly put more than 400 filters under the 15-acre California Base Lodge parking lot through manhole covers to reduce sediment from flowing into Bijou Creek. They are rated to handle a peak flow of 1-inch of runoff or rain per hour.

image_pdfimage_print

About author

This article was written by admin

Comments

Comments (14)
  1. dryclean says - Posted: September 26, 2011

    This project will probably not see a shovel before 2016-18 at best. Plans need to be submitted, public hearings will be held, some enviornmental group will challenge requested variances for height and coverage, the city and county will want to figure out how they can benefit from this and most importantly, the economy needs to turn around. The good news is that Vail is exploring their options by undergoing this first step which in turn indicates they believe investing in South Shore might make sense over the long run.

  2. dumbfounded says - Posted: September 26, 2011

    The obvious solution would be a parking structure that covers the majority of the parking lot area with a lodge that sits directly on top of two or three levels of parking. This would allow control of the runoff, provide parking off the streets and create space at the bottom of the runs. Covered parking, improved facilities, no more street parking mess and a decrease in land coverage.

    I envision a lodge that would provide a view of both the Mountain and the Lake. Incorporated into this structure would be the necessary filtering and runoff control mechanisms necessary.

    It seems very wrong that Heavenly uses the City’s infrastructure but does not pay their share of the taxes that support that infrastructure. The investment would improve the entire California side operation.

    I suppose that there could even be condominium and/or hotel properties created on the top level of the parking as well.

    I can remember having the fire extinguishers refilled at Heavenly Cal Lodge back in the day and joking with the guy refilling them that they should be full of gasoline. C’mon, Andy!

  3. dogwoman says - Posted: September 26, 2011

    I agree with the two D’s above. And I’m glad Heavenly/Vail is exploring improvments. It’s time. It’ll be nice to have it all upgraded.

  4. Perry R. Obray says - Posted: September 26, 2011

    Some very interesting input here. I personally am frustrated about height limits in the basin. If the structure is not infringing on some sun issue, surrounding property views, ect…I see no issue in building to the tree canopy limit area. Only limiting to the canopy height for air safety issues. This apparently frees up much more land to appreciate and enjoy. http://www.dynamicarchitecture.net/ The structures on that website are supposed to be completely energy independent from energy grids. Possibly even able to energize other operations at Heavenly, ect…..

    I personally will like to see parking separated from any inhabited structures for safety reasons. It seems loading up around 2000Lbs of volatile substances into a vehicle is quite a craze lately, and most likely will not go away forever.

  5. Careaboutthecommunity says - Posted: September 26, 2011

    Garage parking would be sweet! Maybe they could dig down, put many levels below ground. Have a couple floors of shops, restaurants, bars, rentals, schools. Then a floor or two for offices. Then some hotel room floors, so people could say right on site, have great views, easy to get the whole family out on the slopes, and dining options on the grounds or room service.

    It’s possible, if they built up, they could reduce their footprint, and create beautiful native landscaped grounds as an entry to the lodge. I’m thinking National Park Style ;)

    Oh, and buy up that Christiana Inn across the street, do something with it!

  6. dryclean says - Posted: September 26, 2011

    No doubt that it will have parking below, retail and then lodging above. I’m not sure how deep they can go with all the underground streams up there. In any case, it will be quite the engineering project. I hope they don’t go to high. Last thing we need are more visible lights.

  7. concerned says - Posted: September 26, 2011

    Dumfounded- Vail does not do enough for the City by attracting all their skiers to town? Why should vail do anymore for our worthless city, they will frivolously spent the money on stupid stuff anyway. Great news that calbase will be upgraded.

  8. Joy Curry says - Posted: September 28, 2011

    Concerned, Why do you live here, if we are such a worthless city? We may have some challenges, but this is one of the most beautiful places in the world to live.

  9. SmedleyButler says - Posted: September 28, 2011

    I do believe that skiers were “attracted” to our “worthless” city before the Vail conglomerate arrived. Good point Joy. We all don’t have to genuflect before the corporate gods and pledge our subservience so we can keep our jobs. We could actually stand up for ourselves as citizens and demand they spread the wealth.

  10. dogwoman says - Posted: September 28, 2011

    “We could actually stand up for ourselves as citizens and demand they spread the wealth.”

    Really? What exactly does Heavenly OWE you? What does anybody owe you unless you have provided a product or service to them? Spread the wealth indeed! The fact that they are here creates quite a bit of wealth for those of us willing to earn it.

  11. SmedleyButler says - Posted: September 28, 2011

    I’ve worked, paid property and income/sales taxes in this town for 35+ yrs. Corporate profiteers owe all the taxpayers of our town for use of our infrastructure, our schools, our social programs our workforce and should not be allowed to “free market” the few of us left to death.

  12. the conservation robot says - Posted: September 28, 2011

    How many jobs at Heavenly pay a living wage? Percent or number.

  13. dogwoman says - Posted: September 28, 2011

    If the job doesn’t pay enough, nobody is holding a gun to your head to make you take it. Be free.

  14. lou pierini says - Posted: September 28, 2011

    How about the dam in sky meadows, put in with no permit, and just below ca. state requirements for height and capacity so no inspections by the state.