Lane files another plan with bankruptcy court
By Kathryn Reed
On the second anniversary of filing for bankruptcy on the scrapped convention center project in South Lake Tahoe, Randy Lane filed a fourth amended reorganization plan.
What he filed Oct. 4 asks for more time – 270 days. The bankruptcy judge in Sacramento is expected to make a ruling Nov. 1. Creditors and other interested parties have until Oct. 18 to offer the court their opinions on that idea.
South Lake Tahoe City Attorney Patrick Enright has indicated his office will be objecting to Lane’s request for an extension.
“The plan is to continue to try to work with the people we are working with, but they are new to the project,” Lane told Lake Tahoe News. “As I’ve said for the last four years, I have not given up and I don’t intend to until they tell me there is nothing else I can do.”
He would not elaborate on who is speaking with or what the 11 plus acres might look like in the future. But he did emphasize the people he is speaking are not the same people who he was talking to two years ago. Two years ago it was Vail Resorts that wanted to operate the hotel that was envisioned.
South Lake Tahoe officials allowed Lane in 2007 to pour the foundation on what was slated to be a more than $400 million convention center-hotel project near the state line without having a consolidated parcel map or secured financing.
Because of this it means multiple people own the fenced off concrete and rebar site – which makes resolution of the bankruptcy proceedings more complicated. Some of the debtors have not foreclosed. Lane owns 13 of the 29 parcels.
Lane is also trying to have the property tax structure changed. A hearing on that is scheduled for March 2012.
Another year, are you kidding me? Enough is enough and continuing to hold our whole town hostage must end.
Would it help if everyone in town got together on a combined effort to present their own objection, besides just the city?
I’ve never heard one good word about this Lane character. Crook, shady, deceitful and selfish are the words I hear to describe him and his gang. I’d run him out of my town but its the creditors who have more at stake than I do.
This is just another example of the City’s mind-boggling poor decision making & a boondoggle that has cost the City a bunch as well as being an eyesore. Sort of like when they bought the airport when the County wanted to dump it because it was financially unsupportable. The City wasted thousands of taxpayer dollars there too. It’s an ongoing pattern of behavior for them through the years.
Why is this fiasco being allowed to continue by the court? The burden this developer has imposed on the city should not be permitted to go on and on.
“Creditors and other interested parties have until Oct. 18 to offer the court their opinions on that idea.”
Sounds like people need to submit comments to the court stating that the residents of the City have had enough of Lane and his bogus plans for the “hole in the ground”.
No doubt, now that Tom is back more Cole will be thrown on the fire.
refresh me please… who was on council when this deal was signed off? Could it have been anyone who is on council now?
Lane is like a 5 year old..if you pester, beg, whine, delay etc long enough your parents will say “yes”. Can’t let that happen..tough love!
“MONEY TALKS AND BS Walks”
End of story.
The city has no guts to solve anything important.