THIS IS AN ARCHIVE OF LAKE TAHOE NEWS, WHICH WAS OPERATIONAL FROM 2009-2018. IT IS FREELY AVAILABLE FOR RESEARCH. THE WEBSITE IS NO LONGER UPDATED WITH NEW ARTICLES.

S. Tahoe cuts staff, gears up to make town more liveable


image_pdfimage_print

By Kathryn Reed

In a matter of seconds the South Lake Tahoe City Council voted to do away with a list of positions. This, after hearing about 2½ hours of testimony – from staff and a dozen others – on the 2011-12 budget.

“It seems so anticlimactic. With these votes we’ve affected so many people’s lives,” Mayor Hal Cole said as he adjourned the meeting.

As the room cleared out, sitting in the very back was Marty Scheuerman. Dressed in his uniform as a division chief with the South Lake Tahoe Fire Department, his body language did not exhibit that of the usually confident firefighter. Instead, he shook his head – not believing this day had finally come.

South Lake Tahoe Mayor Hal Cole on Oct. 18 delivers the state of the city address. Photo/Kathryn Reed

South Lake Tahoe Mayor Hal Cole on Oct. 18 delivers the state of the city address. Photo/Kathryn Reed

His was one of the 19 positions eliminated on Tuesday. In one month, he along with the 18 others (including all three division chiefs) will be without jobs. It’s possible some of them will be hired for one of the six jobs being created by the city.

He is not ready to retire. He wants to keep working. He is not alone.

Ray Zachau is a division chief and the fire marshal. One of the new positions being created is fire marshal. If he applies and were to be picked for the job, he would get the pay of a captain.

But it’s a job.

Even though the city made a convincing case for downsizing, what with 65 percent of the budget going toward personnel expenses and revenues declining – it still means the 16.5 percent unemployment rate in South Lake Tahoe is about to jut up.

While the room was filled Oct. 18 with current and former employees, their pleas to the council members to rethink their impending decisions were unsuccessful. The council on 5-0 votes ultimately chose to go forward with approving the $94.7 million budget (of which $28.6 million is the general fund budget) and subsequent cuts in staff.

Pulled from the agenda were items D and E under New Business – which both had to do with the General and Public Works contracts.

Steve Crouch, who represents this sector (which at about 60 employees is the largest employee group), was conspicuously absent from the budget hearing. His limited time as negotiator is not being well received by all employees.

Negotiations with other labor groups are ongoing. The firefighter association contract was approved Tuesday. If and when other groups settle, appropriate addendums will be made to the 2011-12 budget (fiscal year started Oct. 1) to reflect any changes.

The city speaks

Another noticeable bit of silence was Councilman Bruce Grego. He said nothing about the budget, the people being let go, or the future of the city.

Councilman Tom Davis said how hard this has been and how frustrated he is, adding that as much as employees fight for their jobs, no one has come forward with another way to eliminate the $5.2 million deficit.

Councilwoman Claire Fortier said is it time to invest in the city so it is a viable place for residents, employees and tourists.

Cole said reliance on reserves, while they are being used this fiscal year and likely will be next year as well, must end and the public sector must wake up to the realities the private sector has been living with for years – the need to live within their means.

Councilwoman Angela Swanson made the most impassioned speech, echoing on speaker Mary Ann Klein’s plea to not lose the sense of community when talking numbers and positions. But ultimately, Swanson said, “I was elected to serve 20,000 people, not just the 200 who work here.”

The day started with Cole giving the state of the city address.

In many ways it was much like a recap of a year’s worth of council decisions. Where the city has been, the decisions made to keep it afloat, and the vision for the future were neatly outlined in his 30-minute speech.

He was adamant in saying the vision is that of the council’s, to which they direct City Manager Tony O’Rourke and the rest of the staff to carry out their policy decisions.

“We have to rebuild this community. That is our long-term future. We need to maintain the residential base and attract tourists,” O’Rourke said. He is the first city manager to embrace and openly acknowledge South Lake Tahoe is a tourist-based economy and as such must work too attract tourists while maintaining a town people want to live in.

What others said

Noteworthy were the faces in the crowd not usually at a council meeting – representatives from Heavenly Mountain Resort, South Tahoe Public Utility District, El Dorado County Sheriff’s Department, South Lake Tahoe police and fire, Barton Health, and Tahoe Regional Planning Agency.

Pete Sonntag, general manager at Heavenly, explained the resort’s $25 million investment in the gondola was contingent upon lift ticket sales not being taxed. He said if the city were to renege on that deal, it would likely make future developers question whether the city will stick by its contracts.

He pointed to the 1,500 employees the resort has in the winter with an annual payroll of $16 million as evidence the company is part of this community.

“Our company may be based in Colorado, but we’re locals,” Sonntag said of the employees.

Recreation was a common theme Tuesday.

Teri Jamin, who worked for the city from 1984-2009, talked snowplow drivers and parks and rec. She believes the personal touch at the rec center will be compromised with the elimination of staff.

“The litmus test is in the end result; is it in the best interest of the city of South Lake Tahoe?” Jamin said.

Setting the record straight

• People still don’t understand the city can’t do anything about the hole – aka would be convention center. It’s in bankruptcy.

• It was noted the current operators of the ice rink are paying utilities, are responsible for maintenance and operations costs, and must set aside money for future capital improvements.

• In the past, 16 full-time employees and three or four seasonal workers were used for snowplowing. This winter, 10 full-time workers will do the job with the assistance of 11 seasonal workers.

• Bijou Golf Course will not be operated by a private entity because the return on invest is not there.

• Talks are under way to have El Dorado County operate the senior center and Lake Tahoe Boys & Girls Club to have a greater role in youth recreation.

“The service will be seamless,” O’Rourke said. And services will not be diminished.

• The City Council’s budget was slated to go up 4 percent or $7,800 to pay for any classes or travel the five may want to partake in. However, they voted that out of the budget.

• It will be in early 2012 the council will be asked to formally approve going forward with the certificate of participation to pay for infrastructure. There would be $4 million for roads, with $1 million divvied up between Harrison Avenue and Linear Park. Linear Park is slated to get about a quarter of that $1 million, with another $20,000 in city coffers for Linear Park donated from Core 24 Charities.

• Even if the Tahoe Valley Community Plan were adopted, it could not be implemented until the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency adopts its Regional Plan.

image_pdfimage_print

About author

This article was written by admin

Comments

Comments (28)
  1. Tessy says - Posted: October 18, 2011

    Great reporting LTN. These are tough times for everyone and economists says the future isn’t looking any better, which is scary. We need to bring more companies that will invest here and hope we pull through this.

  2. dryclean says - Posted: October 19, 2011

    We need to fix the roads, buildings and sidewalks before they will come here. We need to show them our revenues are lengthy/or will be, business expenses are freindly and the citizenry want them in their town . Once done I think many more people will come. Check out the Mayor;s speech on channel 21 every day

  3. Skier says - Posted: October 19, 2011

    Consolidate the fire department now that they have no management. Save entire community money.

  4. Not Born on the Bayou says - Posted: October 19, 2011

    Thanks for another informative and succinct article. The reality is harsh, but change is needed.

    I will echo dryclean and the city manager here. As a regular visitor from the Bay Area, I doubt I’d be coming to South Lake much had the Heavenly Village complex not been built. It is the modern, convenient, and walkable area that is the draw, fitting within the beauty of your setting and the amenities of a real town. But no matter how often we get up there, after a short while, we can’t wait to get back.

    Even such less expensive BUT COMPREHENSIVE cosmetic changes to the town’s signage, painting/upgrading building exteriors along Lake Tahoe Boulevard, and finishing the road work going on along Highway 50, plus bike trails wherever you can add them, will help a lot. It will change outside people’s perception, and for the better.

    Think of the area from Ski Run to Edgewood as a standout visitor magnet that people will want to use as a base while they enjoy the beauty and recreation of the area – while not neglecting the rest of the town, but focusing on what will bring them there. Then, phase in upgrades slowly elsewhere as the base of visitor money expands. Go beyond marketing mainly to Californians after the improvements are in place, and reach for a wider visitor base.

    Throw in occasionally discounts, more concerts, free gondola ride drawings on occasion, gourmet food carts in the plazas, and expanded recreation like climbing walls, nature trails, skate board parks, bike races, Stand up paddleboard rallies, frisbee golf tourneys, public fountains for kids to run through, etc etc — and the town can become even more of a sparkling gem.

    SLT already has one big thing going for it that the otherwise attractive alternatives like Squaw and Northstar do not – you’re right on the Lake. That’s one other big reason I prefer it – and the town has more things to do than the attractive but more boring north shore towns on the lake. Use that advantage – make it more accessible via walking and bike, and add minimal but useful amenities along the shore itself.

    The potential is there. Positive persistence and creativity can go a long way.

  5. Another X Local says - Posted: October 19, 2011

    As usual, the City continues on its misguided path in spite of the knowlegeable comments by numerous people yesterday. To paraphrase another politician, they are attempting to “put lipstick on a pig” to pretty up the City while essentially gutting public safety. I’m surprised they don’t abolish both the police & fire departments & dump that responsibility on El Dorado County. Sure, they will have a pretty city but nobody will want to come here with the reduced public safety. As for hiring a new fire marshal, who in their right mind would want to work for an organization with a track record like theirs?

  6. 4-mer usmc says - Posted: October 19, 2011

    This town NEEDS to be aesthetically upgraded. Two of the three top revenue generators for this City are TOT and sales tax. To get those revenues requires people to come here and spend their money and individuals having excess discretionary monies to spend don’t want to go somewhere that looks shoddy and rundown–and their alternate choices for places to visit are endless. I think the long-term goal is to make this town appealing so people want to come here, and when they do they’ll spend money which will ultimately increase the City’s revenues. It’s a lot like buying a rundown house that needs repairs and upgrades. You work your butt off and save every penny so you can put together a down payment, then you work your butt off and fix it up while at the same time sacrificing any kind of outside entertainment, new car, etc., and when you’re done you have a house that’s significantly increased in value along with a sense of pride for what you’ve accomplished. Of course people who think that the Trout Creek Motel is OK probably won’t understand this concept.

  7. PubworksTV says - Posted: October 19, 2011

    TO BE CLEAR – All this whining over 19 government jobs bugs me!

    My sympathies are with the 1000s of hard working risk taking business owners that have been destroyed over the past few years by progressive liberals and the confiscatory taxes.

  8. nature bats last says - Posted: October 19, 2011

    PUB works TV BLah Blah Blah

  9. Skibum says - Posted: October 19, 2011

    Councilman Tom Davis said how hard this has been and how frustrated he is, adding that as much as employees fight for their jobs, no one has come forward with another way to eliminate the $5.2 million deficit.
    I find that hard to believe as I have gone to the council several times with soulutions andn ways to raise revenue. The last council meeting Mr. Grego wanted to see if there was a way to tax Heavenly but couldn’t get a second. The council will continue to waffle away from the two areas that would get this city out of their financial problem, Heavenly and Vacation Rentals By Owner. We need someone with a set of brass balls on the council and do whats right for the community.

  10. Skibum says - Posted: October 19, 2011

    Pete Sonntag, general manager at Heavenly, explained the resort’s $25 million investment in the gondola was contingent upon lift ticket sales not being taxed. He said if the city were to renege on that deal, it would likely make future developers question whether the city will stick by its contracts.

    Tom Davis and Hal Cole were on the council when that agreement was signed. Everytime I brought up that subject of taxing Heavenly, which by the way has been two years, I have been ignored. I have had a council member actually ask me to back off writing about it because Heavenly was going to do a major project at the Cal Lodge and I was rocking the boat. I also had Blaise call me an a$$ hole when I wrote that we should tax Heavenly. I love Heavenly and what Vail is doing for and to this town but it time to step up to the plate. Senior management of the city is also in agreement yet the council refuses to touch them. They would rather tax the existing business to death, lay off workers and lick the ski boots of Heavenly than do what’s RIGHT for this community. The residents, City and County of South Lake Tahoe, are held hostage by the 23% who voted in the last election. They/we/I are also held hostage by 4 council members who refuse and are afraid to touch any sacred cows in this town. Rest in Peace Tahoe.

  11. Clear Water says - Posted: October 19, 2011

    This what happens when you keep electing the same worn out, have the cake, eat it to,they are still reading the same notes from 1984 when times were very good.

    More money going out than coming in,simple!

    They sown many seeds(ideas) but most were diseased, now you starve from bad decisions “This town been dying for 20 years”.
    Corporation take care their own,Town can’t take care of itself.
    Just keep the water running,power turned on and it’s everyone for themselves in getting to the store ,staying warm.

    We don’t want end up like a new era Donner party of business cannibals! $$

    Life could of been better without the Heavenly village, the Vail party, business would still be doing business on the hole side the street ,the airport shut down,the parking garage never been built with so many strings attached.

    One the biggest Screw up was when Harrah’s bought Harvey’s,There is a lack of competition .

  12. Jonathan Moore says - Posted: October 19, 2011

    Is it time for “the people” to “Occupy” South Lake Tahoe?

  13. dogwoman says - Posted: October 19, 2011

    OSLT? THAT’S funny! Have you listened to some of those OWS interviews? Those people don’t have a clue. And big money somewhere is keeping them fed and medicated when necessary. Here in little SLT most of us are too busy working for a living to indulge in such silliness.
    Oh, and WINTER’S coming. How can you Occupy on a powder day?

  14. SmedleyButler says - Posted: October 19, 2011

    Sycophant personified. Cognitive dissonance forever.

  15. dogwoman says - Posted: October 19, 2011

    Smedley, are you the Robot in disguise? Or have you just been learning intelligent sounding phrases at his knee?

  16. snoheather says - Posted: October 19, 2011

    Jonathan- That is so funny but sad at the same time. When we actually have regular people, not “career politicians”, running for the city council they don’t get the votes. People need to wake up and stop voting for the same losers everytime. It is time for the voters to wake up and stop voting for people who have a familiar name. We need to OCCUPY the voting lines, instead of being lazy and allowing these same people to take office.

  17. snoheather says - Posted: October 19, 2011

    Only then will we have the “Change” everyone is wanting.

  18. Parker says - Posted: October 19, 2011

    Councilman Cole was sitting up there when the City handed out raises like it was candy, and added staff like it was on a run to the grocery store. If he feels bad that he’s affecting so many lives, he shouldn’t have let the City bureaucracy grow out of control in the first place!

    Yet there are good, dedicated people who have been laid off! I know that first hand. Ironically the good ones I know have no relatives higher up in the City. I wonder after these layoffs how much nepotism still exists?

    But the one bit of good news is that it sounds like for the first time I can recall, the Council is truly trying to find ways to grow our economy! Doing that will put both the Private and Public Sectors on sounder footing!

  19. the conservation robot says - Posted: October 19, 2011

    Two people, same diagnosis, maybe we are onto something. Admit it, you learned that phrase from me…

  20. dogwoman says - Posted: October 19, 2011

    Yeah, I suspected as much. But Robot, you need to teach Smedley a little better. I don’t think the term “sycophant” quite fits. There are no influential libertarians or conservatives in this town who I would be sucking up to with my statements.

  21. the conservation robot says - Posted: October 19, 2011

    They didn’t who this to you on Fox News, so you don’t know about it.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vhO3dTdp6ek

    PS Fox News is having a hard time getting on air in Canada because they don’t live up to their standards for journalism. And that’s where you get your information.

  22. Skibum says - Posted: October 19, 2011

    Thanks dog, does this mean I owe an extra beer at the next party?

  23. dogwoman says - Posted: October 19, 2011

    @skibum: Yes.
    @robot. Wrong again. I get most of my news online.

  24. the conservation robot says - Posted: October 19, 2011

    from foxnews.com

  25. snoheather says - Posted: October 19, 2011

    :)

  26. the conservation robot says - Posted: October 20, 2011

    hey I lost that link to the Islamophobic propaganda video. care to link it up again, with the original website you found it on?

  27. dogwoman says - Posted: October 20, 2011

    Robot, the link had been posted by a facebook friend, so it may take awhile to come up with it again. I’ll let you know if I find it.
    But no, I didn’t get it from fox news. They are NOT the only conservative news source out there, ya know.

  28. dogwoman says - Posted: October 21, 2011

    Found it for you, Robot.
    http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-871902797772997781#
    Still don’t know where you find fault with this. They’re all believers or former believers. They know what it’s really about.
    Anyhow, bookmark it this time so you don’t lose it if it’s that important to you.