THIS IS AN ARCHIVE OF LAKE TAHOE NEWS, WHICH WAS OPERATIONAL FROM 2009-2018. IT IS FREELY AVAILABLE FOR RESEARCH. THE WEBSITE IS NO LONGER UPDATED WITH NEW ARTICLES.

Extent of federal bailout of banks more extensive than first reported


image_pdfimage_print

By Bob Ivry, Bradley Keoun and Phil *****, Bloomberg News

The Federal Reserve and the big banks fought for more than two years to keep details of the largest bailout in U.S. history a secret. Now, the rest of the world can see what it was missing.

The Fed didn’t tell anyone which banks were in trouble so deep they required emergency loans of a combined $1.2 trillion on Dec. 5, 2008, their single neediest day.

Bankers didn’t mention that they took tens of billions of dollars at the same time they were assuring investors their firms were healthy. And no one calculated until now that banks reaped an estimated $13 billion of income by taking advantage of the Fed’s below-market interest rates, Bloomberg Markets magazine reports in its January issue.

Saved by the 2007-2010 bailout, bankers lobbied against government regulations, a job made easier by the Fed, which never disclosed the details of the rescue to lawmakers even as Congress doled out more money and debated new rules aimed at preventing the next collapse.

While Fed officials say that almost all the loans were repaid without losses, details that emerge from 29,000 pages of Fed documents obtained under the Freedom of Information Act and central bank records of more than 21,000 transactions suggest taxpayers paid a price beyond dollars as the secret funding helped preserve a broken status quo and enabled the biggest banks to grow even bigger.

The size of the bailout came to light after Bloomberg LP, the parent of Bloomberg News, won a court battle against the Fed and a group of the biggest banks called Clearing House Association LLC. The amount of money the central bank parceled out dwarfed the Treasury Department’s better-known $700 billion Troubled Asset Relief Program, or TARP.

Few people were aware of this, partly because bankers didn’t disclose the extent of their borrowing.

JPMorgan Chase & Co. Chief Executive Officer Jamie Dimon told shareholders in March 2010 that his bank used the Fed’s Term Auction Facility “at the request of the Federal Reserve to help motivate others to use the system.”

He didn’t say that the bank’s total TAF borrowings were almost twice its cash holdings or that its peak borrowing of $48 billion came more than a year after the program’s creation.

On Nov. 26, 2008, Bank of America’s then-CEO Kenneth Lewis wrote to shareholders that he headed “one of the strongest and most stable major banks in the world.” He didn’t say that Bank of America owed the Fed $86 billion that day. Bank of America’s borrowing peaked at $91.4 billion in February 2009.

Spokesmen for JPMorgan and Bank of America declined to comment.

Read the whole story

 

image_pdfimage_print

About author

This article was written by admin

Comments

Comments (10)
  1. tahoeadvocate says - Posted: November 29, 2011

    I’d bet Barney Franks knew the details.

  2. SmedleyButler says - Posted: November 29, 2011

    Blaming the gop/reaganomics/goldmansachs/ economic disaster on Barney Frank is SO moronic/rush/fox

  3. PubworksTV says - Posted: November 29, 2011

    The housing crisis was indeed long in coming and was caused by the increasing liberalization of our nation.

    Franks, Dodd and Obama are certainly at the front of the line for blame but the line is long.

    Goldman Sachs is and always has been a progressive liberal organization allied primarily with democrats.

    I don’t see how you can fit Reagan into it… some people are just stuck on stupid and like to show it off.

  4. I' m a prisoner caught in a cross fire says - Posted: November 29, 2011

    I SURE HAVE MEET A LOT NEW PEOPLE IN -EL-DORADO BANK that pulled their accounts from B&A joined the areas nicest bunch people.
    THE PROTEST DID HAVE SOME GOOD RESULTS FOR SUCH A SMALL TOWN.

  5. sunriser2 says - Posted: November 29, 2011

    The first accurate article on Tarp I have ever read.

    I burned a week of vacation time meeting with Reid’s economic advisers in Reno on this issue.

    If the occupy Wall Street folks would get behind this issue I would go to the site and cook for them.

  6. PubworksTV says - Posted: November 29, 2011

    Sunriser…

    This wasn’t TARP – did you read the article?

    “The amount of money the central bank parceled out dwarfed the Treasury Department’s better-known $700 billion Troubled Asset Relief Program, or TARP.”

    TARP was approved by congress … This was not.

  7. dogwoman says - Posted: November 29, 2011

    Some of us didn’t need a “movement” to figure out it was time to transfer funds to a local bank. We did it some time ago. Ahead of the herd.

  8. I' m a prisoner caught in a cross fire says - Posted: November 29, 2011

    OK doggy I belief you, you missed the point.
    In order to have any change at least some people are trying anything, sure beats the hell out an empty city council meeting, and they even let you speak to each other and don’t have mayors having the Fuzz ask you to leave because you aren’t kissing rear ends.

    These are real people trying to make a change.A difference.They are not all young people,Americans taking advantage of their right to assemble,make people aware.Better than apple pie.They are a small circle of hands, why not join in?
    You might like it.Failer is the beginning of success.

    No one who sitting here reading the same old stuff, will ever see any change, unless you get up scream out the window, I’m not going to take this anymore like the movie.

    I really appreciate that there are some very small people out there fighting for a good cause ,even if it’s not stopping traffic or letting the radicals go banana’s, crashing, destroying private property, it’s a movement in spirit,ideas.(nothing wrong with wanting the big cheese to be Fair)
    What else does the country have left anymore?

  9. gyspyrose says - Posted: November 30, 2011

    Bernanke should be fired and so should Tim Geithner. Their both corrupt to the core.
    And Obama is probably in on it with em.
    There they let them big banks, Goldman
    sachs make all them billions. And we can’t make any money off of ours, cause they cut the interest rate to the bone.
    If, any in congress had half a brain,
    then they would get rid of Bernanke.
    He could’ve warned the people of all those fore closers, way before they happen.

  10. Alex Campbell says - Posted: December 1, 2011

    Thanx Terry Havens and the gang at the Al Tahoe branch for the last 20 years.