THIS IS AN ARCHIVE OF LAKE TAHOE NEWS, WHICH WAS OPERATIONAL FROM 2009-2018. IT IS FREELY AVAILABLE FOR RESEARCH. THE WEBSITE IS NO LONGER UPDATED WITH NEW ARTICLES.

Reno fire far from contained; homes remain threatened


image_pdfimage_print

Publisher’s note: South Lake Tahoe firefighters have been sent to Reno.

By Reno Gazette-Journal

9:30pm: Containment for the Caughlin Fire was at zero percent Friday night, and 2,000 homes remained threatened. A cause had not been determined. About 2,300 customers remained without power as the result of the fire reported at 12:22am.

8:45pm: About 455 firefighters are on duty — including 150 overnight — looking for hot spots, contain fire and assess the damage. Thirty fire engines are to remain on patrol overnight. About,2000 homes remain threatened.

Firefighters struggle to contain the Reno blaze. Photo/Reno Gazette-Journal

Firefighters struggle to contain the Reno blaze. Photo/Reno Gazette-Journal

8:15pm: Blaze stands at 2,000 acres with 0% containment at Caughlin Fire. No cause yet for the fire. The Caughlin Fire stands at about 2,000 acres with 21 structures damaged. No cause of the for the fire determined, fire officials said.

7:30pm: Areas where homes were lost or damaged include Gibraltar Drive, Pioneer Drive, Quiet Meadows Court, Meadow Valley Lane and Lakeridge Shores West, officials said. Residents in the area also reported homes on Alpine Creek Road had been burned.

6:40pm: Officials said they did not expect to begin allowing evacuated residents to return home until about noon Saturday. Affected homeowners were urged to contact authorities for updates on evacuation status.

6:10pm: Firefighters said they saved 4,000 or more homes from a late-season wildfire that burned about 2,000 acres and could have been far worse.

Read the whole story

image_pdfimage_print

About author

This article was written by admin

Comments

Comments (8)
  1. Bob says - Posted: November 18, 2011

    And the FD wants to do a “controlled” burn at Angora today. IDIOTS!!!!!!

  2. Robert says - Posted: November 18, 2011

    It,s not the FD that wants to do a controled burn it,s the Forest Circus.

  3. D says - Posted: November 18, 2011

    In the Forest SERVICEs defense, the control burn was started yesterday during ideal conditions with light wind and snow that was supposed to move in last night. But as weather does, things changed, and the winds picked up and the snow is delayed. The Reno situation is of course very unfortunate and it is scary to do a controlled burn during high winds in an area that we all have an emotional reaction to b/c of the Angora Fire. But, just think of the resurgence of morel mushrooms this spring in the newly burned area…yum!

  4. dogwoman says - Posted: November 18, 2011

    D, I know they started the burn yesterday but “light winds” is NOT what was predicted. All the weather forecasts were for 100 mph winds by last night, which can whip that stuff into a frenzy. I understand they need to burn. I just question why both the burns in the last few weeks at Angora have been during extreme wind conditions, and both times thoroughly well predicted.

  5. Cheva Heck, USFS Public Affairs says - Posted: November 18, 2011

    Hello, all. Thanks for sharing your concerns about our prescribed fire operations in Angora. I wanted to let you know that, like the earlier prescribed fire operations in the Angora fire area, yesterday’s project was very successful. We’re one step further in eliminating hazardous forest fuels that would increase the future risk of a high-intensity wildfire.

    A wildfire is obviously an unplanned situation, putting us at a disadvantage as we respond. In contrast, prescribed fire operations are carefully planned and implemented. At least some wind is desirable for prescribed fire operations, because it carries smoke up and out.

    Our staff check weather conditions repeatedly before beginning prescribed fire operations and make sure that they have the firefighters and other resources in place to manage the prescribed fire. The safety of our communities and our firefighters is always our top priority.

  6. scadmin says - Posted: November 18, 2011

    I agree with Dogwoman. High winds were predicted for yesterday. While it is understandable that the presence of some wind allows the smoke to blow away, rather than being trapped by an inversion layer, it seems unsafe to go forward with a controlled burn when heavy gusts are predicted. Residents in the burn area are understandably concerned and jittery about this project. The Reno fire hasn’t helped ease those fears.

  7. I' m a prisoner caught in a cross fire says - Posted: November 18, 2011

    HEY, WHAT THE “HECK” ARE YOU SURE YOUR SUCESSFUL FIRE DIDN’T PICK UP AMBERS DROP IN RENO?

    SURE WAS BURNING THE EYES IN THE STATELINE AREA LAST NIGHT AFTER 11 PM!

    HECK, ARE YOU DESTROYING THE OZONE? You know the layer that’s suppose to protect from the UV RAYS!