Long-awaited Harrison Ave. upgrades in works in S. Tahoe
By Kathryn Reed
While South Lake Tahoe is never likely to have a downtown based on how haphazardly the city was allowed to develop and that the main road is a state highway, another five blocks are about to be removed from the blighted category.
Harrison Avenue between Los Angeles and Lakeview avenues is ranked No. 2 on the city’s list of priorities for capital improvement projects.
No drastic changes are proposed from what has been talked about for the last 14 years. But the funding to do the complete streets overhaul is still not in place. The price tag in 2006 was at least $1 million. The total amount today is projected to be $1,625,844.
The bulk of that money ($805,770) is likely to come from the certificate of participation bond the council will vote on and likely execute early next year.
Money is starting to trickle in. At the Nov. 1 City Council meeting the five electeds accepted $275,074 from the Tahoe Metropolitan Planning Organization’s Regional Surface Transportation Program to begin the planning and design of Harrison Avenue.
“We think the economy has persuaded business owners to look at things differently now,” Jim Marino, South Lake Tahoe capital improvement project manager, said.
In the past, the owners on this frontage street paralleling Highway 50 have dragged their feet. Coverage is a big concern, along with parking.
What has been on the books for years are what the city is going with – making Harrison Avenue one-way, diagonal parking, sidewalks and a class 1 bike trail.
Part of the bid package for the project includes looking at forming a business improvement district, much like what the Ski Run area has.
Mayor Hal Cole is concerned if one property owner disagrees with the plans that the whole project will be doomed. With a BID, that is less likely to happen.
A design proposal is expected to be presented to the council at the Nov. 15 meeting.
Marino said business and property owners have been involved in design aspects.
With Caltrans this summer-fall putting in curbs and gutters along this stretch of the highway, the transformation has begun. Plus, the area ties into all the improvements being done at Lakeview Commons.
In waiting this long to actually move forward, the California Tahoe Conservancy has changed its mind about the parcel it owns next to the Tahoe Daily Tribune building. It is now willing to swap it for the land the city owns on Glenwood Avenue where the old drive-in was. The city would use the Harrison land for parking.
Marino expects to have Harrison Avenue be a shovel-ready project in 2012, with building starting the following construction season.
In other action:
• A contract with Clean Tahoe Program that ends Sept. 30, 2015, was signed, with the contingency an audit or review of the books is done this year because one has not been done since 2008.
• An agreement was signed with Nichols Consulting Engineers to begin the planning process of putting in sidewalks on Pioneer Trail between Highway 50 and Larch Avenue.
• The city is paying nearly $35,000 to equip the snow removal fleet with GPS navigation systems. It will cost the city nearly $6,000 a year to keep the system running. The point of it according the staff report is to provide “greater flexibility in vehicle assignments for the streets superintendent.” The public will also be able to view snow removal by neighborhood or street.
• A two-year contract with the Stationary Engineers, Local 39 was approved. Those general and public works employees will pay 4 percent of their PERS contribution this fiscal year and the full 8 percent in 2012-13. No COLAs are part of the deal. They agreed to changes in the health care plan which would take effect when all other groups sign-off on that aspect of the deal.
A GPS navigation system is a huge waste of money, the Street Superintendent should be on the road looking at all the streets and assigning the work where necessary. This is a bad idea and a big waste of money, plus another $6000 a year to run it. dumb
I agree with X Local, GPS? are you kidding?
Actually the GPS seems like a good idea. One superintendent cannot personally see all streets at once like you can with GPS and you can visibly see what streets are in need of service, have been served, and which are neglected. The idea that the public can see where are the plows is also a great idea. I think this will allow more public impute and more accountability.
Thanks for the good research work on the development of Harrison Ave.! It all sounds wonderful. I hope business owners see the benefits and will work closely with you!
When Snow Removal begins, it must be done in a pattern or you will have plows running all over the city trying to take care of citizen complaints and neglecting the rest of the areas.
Does GPS show how much snow is on the street ???
GPS is a BAD IDEA and a waste of tax payer Dollars. You will see!!!
The City has just lost 4 of it’s top operators [Due to lay offs ] and you will see what a bad Idea that was when the Snow begins to fall.
Good luck.
Another project with reduced parking.
Maybe all the businesses can install walk-up windows like McDonald’s.
I agree with you X Local. This GPS plan is dumb and a waste of tax payer money.So.Shore is a small town and the street superintendent can make the calls for where to send the plows in a short time by just driving through the various neighborhoods.But then what do I know?
I’ve only lived here for 50 years and know very little about Tahoe weather and snow removal,lol!
Take care , Old Long Skiis
Sunriser, did you read the whole story? It says: In waiting this long to actually move forward, the California Tahoe Conservancy has changed its mind about the parcel it owns next to the Tahoe Daily Tribune building. It is now willing to swap it for the land the city owns on Glenwood Avenue where the old drive-in was. The city would use the Harrison land for parking.
“To begin the planning and design”, as noted, the idea of redoing Harrison Ave.(parallel to Highway 50 it’s entire length)has been around for 14 years – what happened to the “plans & designs” done then ?
Does this just keep ‘planning & design’ alive ?
As to parking, the lot across the street from the original rest room parking lot was created just for that purpose (albeit with longer spaces for boat trailers), but is still not used very much, due to our insistence on putting cars as close to our destination as possible.
Do we need to expense for another just so people have to walk less ?
Done right, Harrison could become a fine walkable neighborhood element with new business geared to attract more, instead of the constant maneuvering of cars going in all directions, threatened at most intersections.
Cyclists carry their money in about 6 sq.inches (their wallet) along with a much higher demographic, as well. . .
I’m all for something different in this corridor . . .
I did read the entire article. That’s why I made the comment.
I don’t care what the reason is, building without parking is destin to fail.
I bet the city will start charging for parking in the commons area soon and cause a parking nightmare like the one at crescent V.
As far as the bicyclists fat wallets goes. The hub of bicycle and outdoor activities has been the “Y” area and hwy 89 corridor.
The amount of bicycle traffic appears to have grown dramatically over the past three or four years. Yet the restaurants are still closed or struggling.
For years people have said they need to remodel the old Inks market,Rojo’s,AAA free coffee joint, BUSINESS AREA.
The street will make no difference.
X-Local.I agree with you, are all you so short mined about GPS and the million paid to some idiot in town to design software for the go blues system, when they had the big plans for GPS dispatch and pick up.
What a waste of time money and after few years of reality, we end up with one the sh–est trans system for any resort destination in the country, kinda the say favor with the money pit airport.
With regard to GPS tracking and while I am not a snow removal expert I did a search of destinations that use GPS tracking for snow removal. Just on a quick check there seems to be a number of satisfied customers. Some quick example areas:
Buffalo
Oklahoma City
Prince Georges
Chicago
New York
Ottawa
Bridgeport
Additionally, a number of areas beyond South Shore are implementing this program including:
Cincinnati
Missoula
Eau Claire
As well as many others. I would be interested in testing the system. My opinion is we should always look at potential technology to augment service delivery.
O.K. we have 20 snow removal operators full time and temp’s, it snows the crew is split day and night shifts. 10 on days, 10 on nights. One would think a good supervisor should be able to handle this without GPS tracking, ya think??? Does the city really need to spend this money? The commons looks great and Harrison looks to a positive project. Great info Kae!
It’s hard to tell if at this point if it’s worth it. It will depend on what the results of the GPS system are. If in fact the new system improves efficiency and saves dollars over the cost of the GPS system then it would suggest it would be worth the invested capital.
If on the other hand the new system does not improve efficiency or if it worsens efficiency then obviously it’s not going to be worth it.
The system also allows residents to track the progress of plowing and hopefully anticipate when a plow is coming their way, that alone might be a very valued serviced for some.
Don’t know the answers yet. I think the city should give it a try. Innovation is good.
Gee, how did we ever get along all these years without it? Pretty expensive price tag if they find out it doesn’t work as expected.
Carl doesn’t care about spending the city money, he takes any idiots handout for a price.
Look at what all that good advice done for So.lake Tahoe?