THIS IS AN ARCHIVE OF LAKE TAHOE NEWS, WHICH WAS OPERATIONAL FROM 2009-2018. IT IS FREELY AVAILABLE FOR RESEARCH. THE WEBSITE IS NO LONGER UPDATED WITH NEW ARTICLES.

Opinion: Voters should decide California’s future


image_pdfimage_print

Publisher’s note: This is an open letter to the people of California from Gov. Jerry Brown.

To the people,

When I became governor again — 28 years after my last term ended in 1983 — California was facing a $26.6 billion budget deficit. It was the result of years of failing to match spending with tax revenues as budget gimmicks instead of honest budgeting became the norm.

In January, I proposed a budget that combined deep cuts with a temporary extension of some existing taxes. It was a balanced approach that would have finally closed our budget gap.

Jerry Brown

I asked the Legislature to enact this plan and to allow you, the people of California, to vote on it. I believed that you had the right to weigh in on this important choice: should we decently fund our schools or lower our taxes? I don’t know how you would have voted, but we will never know. The Republicans refused to provide the four votes needed to put this measure on the ballot.

Forced to act alone, Democrats went ahead and enacted massive cuts and the first honest, on-time budget in a decade. But without the tax extensions, it was simply not possible to eliminate the state’s structural deficit.

The good news is that our financial condition is much better than a year ago. We cut the ongoing budget deficit by more than half, reduced the state’s workforce by about 5,500 positions and cut unnecessary expenses like cell phones and state cars. We actually cut state expenses by over $10 billion. Spending is now at levels not seen since the seventies. Our state’s credit rating has moved from “negative” to “stable,” laying the foundation for job creation and a stronger economic recovery.

Unfortunately, the deep cuts we made came at a huge cost. Schools have been hurt and state funding for our universities has been reduced by 25 percent. Support for the elderly and the disabled has fallen to where it was in 1983. Our courts suffered debilitating reductions.

The stark truth is that without new tax revenues, we will have no other choice but to make deeper and more damaging cuts to schools, universities, public safety and our courts.

That is why I am filing this week an initiative with the Attorney General’s Office that would generate nearly $7 billion in dedicated funding to protect education and public safety. I am going directly to the voters because I don’t want to get bogged down in partisan gridlock as happened this year. The stakes are too high.

My proposal is straightforward and fair. It proposes a temporary tax increase on the wealthy, a modest and temporary increase in the sales tax, and guarantees that the new revenues be spent only on education.

Here are the details:

Millionaires and high-income earners will pay up to 2 percent higher income taxes for five years. No family making less than $500,000 a year will see their income taxes rise. In fact, fewer than 2 percent of California taxpayers will be affected by this increase.

There will be a temporary half cent increase in the sales tax. Even with this temporary increase, sales taxes will still be lower than what they were less than six months ago.

This initiative dedicates funding only to education and public safety—not on other programs that we simply cannot afford.

This initiative will not solve all of our fiscal problems. But it will stop further cuts to education and public safety.

I ask you to join with me to get our state back on track.

Jerry Brown, governor of California

image_pdfimage_print

About author

This article was written by admin

Comments

Comments (3)
  1. PubworksTV says - Posted: December 6, 2011

    this guy is great, a real leader of liberals…

    …hey we need more of your money, comon, cough it up.

    … did someone mention abyss?

  2. DougM says - Posted: December 7, 2011

    One of the highest 2 or 3 taxed states in the nation, and sharing the status with those, as the most broke. Great. Drive the last of the employing and already highest tax payers from your state. Enough fools in CA to pull it off. “Cut to spending levels of the 70s”? My god what a lying dick. There are more fat assed freeloading public sector retired pensioneers in CA than there are in Greece! Only so much time before CA shares the same video coverage that Greece does.

  3. Parker says - Posted: December 7, 2011

    As SacBee columnist Dan Walters put it, here’s the argument against the Gov. Brown’s tax plan: Why should we pay more when we already have one of the nation’s highest tax burdens, when the Legislature is handing out raises to its staff, when politicians haven’t curbed rapidly increasing pension costs, when they’re wasting billions on prisons, when they’ve shunned a spending limit, when they’ve squandered money on a hapless bullet train project and unworkable computer systems, when they’re spending tens of millions on illegal immigrants’ college educations, and – most importantly – when the state is mired in recession and 2 million-plus are jobless?