THIS IS AN ARCHIVE OF LAKE TAHOE NEWS, WHICH WAS OPERATIONAL FROM 2009-2018. IT IS FREELY AVAILABLE FOR RESEARCH. THE WEBSITE IS NO LONGER UPDATED WITH NEW ARTICLES.

Pier installation signals start of Tahoe Beach Club


image_pdfimage_print

By Kathryn Reed

STATELINE – Not wanting their permit to become invalid, Tahoe Beach Club developers decided to create even more phases for the multimillion dollar project at the end of Kahle Drive in Stateline.

Putting in about 60 feet of what will be a 159.6-foot pier this fall and adding the remainder next year satisfies the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency’s stipulations that movement on a project must begin within three years of the permit being issued. Had the developers – Tom Castaneda and Bob Mecay – not put in the floating pier this fall, it would have meant starting at the very beginning with the permitting process.

That would have been a costly endeavor – time-wise and financially.

The floating section of the Tahoe Beach Club pier was installed this fall. Photos/Kathryn Reed

After all, five agencies were involved in the pier – TRPA, Douglas County, Nevada Division of Environmental Protection, Nevada Division of State Lands, and the Coast Guard.

Three engineering firms had to witness the pylons being put in to make sure the soil wasn’t disturbed in a manner that would stir up the sand and be bad for Lake Tahoe. Some who witnessed the installation said a person walking in the water would have kicked up more sand.

The pier, when complete, will have a price tag of about $400,000 – with a substantial portion of that figure involving the permitting process.

Castaneda and Mecay wanted the entire pier to be floating, but said TRPA rules no longer allow that to happen because with the dock abutting the shore it could present erosion concerns.

The Tahoe Beach Club pier brings the number of floating docks on Lake Tahoe to 19. The 275-foot one at the Hyatt in Incline comes all the way to the shore.

“New engineering designs will allow us to lower and raise the entire 100-foot second section,” Castaneda said. “We will do that two to three times a year so that it is at the same level of the floating pier. Then there will be an adjustable ramp between them.”

Walking on the Trex platform it’s hard to know it’s floating because of the stability. Steel sits on top of the floats.

With waves several feet high a couple weeks ago, the dock’s stability passed Mother Nature’s test.

The end of the floating section is 36-feet-long – twice what the walkway is. This is so larger boats could dock to pick up residents for excursions.

The main project

While the economy has stalled Castaneda and Mecay’s plans to remove the mobile home park and replace it with 143 high-end housing units, they see a ray of light in the financial world.

“The financial investment atmosphere is a lot better than a year and two years ago,” Castaneda told Lake Tahoe News. “We would like to lock up some construction financing. I would safely say next year and then begin the project.”

This would be the first multifamily residential property built on the shores of Lake Tahoe in nearly 30 years.

Tom Castaneda and Bob Mecay are eager to build Tahoe Beach Club.

Castaneda and Mecay bought the 19-acre parcel in 2002 for about $12.6 million. At that time 155 mobile homes occupied most of the land that sits between Rabe Meadow and the University of Nevada 4-H Camp. Now at Tahoe Shores Mobile Home Park there are 18 vacant lots, about 30 people leasing spots from the property owners, and another 110 mobile homes the two men own and lease out. It has been a mobile home park since the 1960s.

While 39 units were supposed to be real phase 1, that will now be phase 3. One hundred and fifty people are on a waiting list to buy into the development. They want one of the units that range from 1,250- to 4,000-square-feet.

The luxury villas will have 19 to 30 units in a building, while the estate homes have four to eight units. The lower level will be one story, while second floor units will have a loft.

The later will be designed to have the feel of a brownstone.

The architecture, though, is old-style Tahoe, with influences of the Tahoe Tavern running throughout.

In all, there will be 14 buildings along one mile.

A private 40,000-square-foot beach club on the water is part of the plans. It will include a restaurant, full spa, workout area and facilities for banquets-parties-weddings. The club will offer memberships to the public.

Club members will have access to the 270-foot stretch of private beach.

Before the market crashed it was estimated the project would cost $260 million, with units selling for between $1.5 million and $4 million. Those numbers could change depending on when construction and sales begin.

Environmental benefits

Environmental improvements are part of the development’s goals as well. The project ties into the Rabe Meadow restoration work being done by Sierra Colina, Douglas County and the U.S. Forest Service.

Today about 11,384 pounds of sediment reach Lake Tahoe from the acreage owned by Tahoe Beach Club. When the project is built out that will be reduced to 632 pounds of sediment a year.

Two acres of stream environment will be restored. Currently it’s paved.

Greenhouse gas emissions will be cut by 63 percent. Much of that will be accomplished by getting rid of the woodstoves that are now in use.

The goal is to treat the water onsite through an intricate filtration process.

Native vegetation will be used in the landscaping.

Power lines will be put underground. Part of the deal is the developers will also bury the line on the 4-H site.

The whole project is going after silver LEED certification.

(Click on renderings for full picture.)

 

 

 

 

 

image_pdfimage_print

About author

This article was written by admin

Comments

Comments (16)
  1. Tahoan25 says - Posted: December 12, 2011

    Can’t believe this project got approved. If you’ve ever been down at the 4H camp, the space between Edgewood and the camp is way too small for what’s shown on the rendering. What overkill for an already impacted area. Money talks because the average ‘joe’ would never be able to put something this big on a lake where there’s supposed to be federal monies to preserve the clarity.

  2. David says - Posted: December 12, 2011

    Well said Tahoan. But I’m sure they’ll put in some infiltration trenches so it will all be win win!

  3. tahoeadvocate says - Posted: December 12, 2011

    If you’ve read the recently published South Shore Vision you’ll note that Edgewood wants their own pier and they want a 2nd commercial pier near the Stateline. How many piers is too many piers?

  4. Careaboutthecommunity says - Posted: December 12, 2011

    Did the League go after these guys ever? Sure seems quiet compared to the Sierra Colina project. Maybe it’s apples to oranges?

  5. sunriser2 says - Posted: December 12, 2011

    Stuffy rich people with a dog park on one side and happy yelling children on the other.

    That should work well.

  6. enough already says - Posted: December 12, 2011

    “Stuffy rich people with a dog park on one side and happy yelling children on the other.

    That should work well.”

    Agreed :)

  7. lou pierini says - Posted: December 12, 2011

    Where are the people, people like you and I, going to live after being displaced by this development? Where is the League to Save? Hope we get at least two answers!

  8. dumbfounded says - Posted: December 12, 2011

    Interesting comments, but I would much rather have the development and keep the League out of Lake Tahoe’s business. The League could care less where you are going to live, Lou.

  9. dogwoman says - Posted: December 12, 2011

    I don’t care what the League has to say about it either. They’re against everything unless you are a large donor to their cause. They certainly don’t care about the people who actually live here.
    That said, it is private property, and the people who bought that old mobile home park have gotten more than their fair share of grief over the project. All the folks who were crying about being displaced knew darned well that they didn’t own that land and as renters, they had a sweet deal as long as it lasted. Property rights are king in a free society. I think the project looks incredibly crowded, but they have the right to build it. They complied with all the laws, didn’t they?

  10. lou pierini says - Posted: December 12, 2011

    Hi Dog, They complied with all the laws money could buy. lou

  11. nature bats last says - Posted: December 13, 2011

    isnt it interesting how some of the above responders want to know why the LTSLT isnt out there sewing over this project but they are the same responders who lamblast the LTSLT when they do file a lawsuit. Cant have it both ways folks.

  12. TahoeKaren says - Posted: December 13, 2011

    Is this in an effort to create some low-cost housing here in Tahoe? I didn’t think so.

  13. dogwoman says - Posted: December 13, 2011

    The reality is, building permits and environmental (and fire dept!) regulations make building “affordable” housing close to impossible in Tahoe. Especially lakefront! Seriously!

  14. sunriser2 says - Posted: December 14, 2011

    Dogwoman gets it. The reason we have all the empty McMansions is the builders have to spread the worthless fees out over more square feet to make a profit.

  15. Careaboutthecommunity says - Posted: December 14, 2011

    I’m not asking for “The League” to review this project, just wondering why they were all over Sierra Colina, and I personally haven’t heard a word about their involvement with this very sensitive lakefront huge coverage project.

    I’m guessing donations to the League, or they’re just happy to get rid of the unsightly mobile home park that they have looked the other way.

  16. Carl Ribaudo says - Posted: December 14, 2011

    The league did not oppose this project.