THIS IS AN ARCHIVE OF LAKE TAHOE NEWS, WHICH WAS OPERATIONAL FROM 2009-2018. IT IS FREELY AVAILABLE FOR RESEARCH. THE WEBSITE IS NO LONGER UPDATED WITH NEW ARTICLES.

Woodpecker may alter how USFS manages its land


image_pdfimage_print

By Kathryn Reed

A woodpecker may change the way the U.S. Forest Service and others approach thinning projects and forest restoration work in California.

This is because on Dec. 15 the state Fish and Game Commission on a 3-1 vote said the black-backed woodpecker is a candidate for protection under the state’s Endangered Species Act. (Commissioner Daniel Richards was the dissenting vote.)

Black-backed woodpecker

This is the same woodpecker species that Earth Island Justice’s John Muir Project said should prevent the Lake Tahoe Basin Management Unit from initiating the South Shore Fuels Reduction Project and the same animal Earth Justice wants to protect in its quest to halt the Angora Fire restoration project.

It could be a year before the state decides what to do about the woodpecker. The Department of Fish & Game has until next December to prepare a status review on the species. After that, the commission votes on whether to protect the bird.

It’s the Center for Biological Diversity and the Earth Island Institute’s John Muir Project that are pushing for the woodpecker’s protection.

“Black-backeds are heavily associated with areas burned at higher fire severities, much more so than unburned forest or low-intensity burn areas (Hutto 2008). Unless steps are taken to ensure that significant habitat is created and allowed for this species in the project area, the project could threaten the viability of the black-backed woodpecker by further reducing potential habitat across the landscape, thus violating the forest plan’s requirement to ensure viability,” Chad Hanson, director of the John Muir Project, wrote in his October letter to the USFS. His group wants the final environmental impact statement for the South Shore Fuels Reduction Project to be withdrawn and a supplemental environmental impact statement be prepared.

Those same arguments are being used to lobby the state.

Hanson is the author of a paper titled “Myth of ‘Catastrophic’ Wildfire”.

A judge sided with the Forest Service over conservation groups regarding the Angora project. This meant work started this summer to thin the area – an area the John Muir Project believes should be left alone because it says it provides habitat for the woodpecker.

This is the Forest Service owned land near where 254 houses burned to the ground in June 2007.

The Forest Service says not clearing the trees will increase the threat of another catastrophic fire.

While the thinning project started this summer, the case is still tied up in the Ninth U.S. District Court of Appeals. If the state says the woodpecker should be listed as endangered, it could make the court case a moot point.

The bird is rare, with people differing over whether it’s always been rare or if its numbers are in decline.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

image_pdfimage_print

About author

This article was written by admin

Comments

Comments (4)
  1. TON Y COLOMBO says - Posted: December 27, 2011

    Here we go again-so………. before our home and 253 other neighbors lost everything in the Angora fire, there were NO blackbacked woodpeckers- now that we have charred trees everywhere,voila! a thriving species! Glad we have cement siding on our rebuilt home. My neighbors with wood siding are helping preserve all the other woodpeckers! Dear do good environmentalists-please take a deep breath- “cause and effect” is not your strong suit, just a lawsuit. rest well.

  2. tahoeadvocate says - Posted: December 27, 2011

    If I follow their logic correctly, we should start burning down all the forests to ensure that significant habitat is created for these birds.

  3. Hang Ups From Way Back says - Posted: December 27, 2011

    The Only Birds people understand are the middle Bird,the one on your right hand with the hair on Palm.
    It drive you crazy with emotional compilations ,when this bird flys through the window while driving with race car drivers on city streets in traffic, people tend get a woody over this endanger bird species.

  4. John says - Posted: December 27, 2011

    Tahoeadvocate, you got it exactly right. Chad Hansen wants to prevent any further fuels reduction projects because they are effective at reducing fire intensity and therefore fewer burned forests. Now really Chad doesnt care at all about this bird. He is and always has hated cutting even a single tree. So this is his new tactic. Its one of many he has used over the years. He and Craig Thomas of Sierra Forest Legacy only want to shut down all logging in California.

    Yes they do both live in houses made of wood. no they cannot reconcile that.