Bickering ties up renewable energy projects in California
By Julie Cart, Los Angeles Times
Millions of dollars in renewable energy projects intended to provide power to facilities in California’s national parks and forests are sitting idle because of a years-long squabble with Southern California Edison.
A new $800,000 solar project at Death Valley National Park, photovoltaic panels at the state-of-the art visitors center at Santa Monica Mountains National Recreation Area and a solar power system at the U.S. Forest Service’s new facility at Mono Lake are among dozens of taxpayer-funded projects in Southern California on hold as the federal agencies try to hash out an agreement with SCE to tie the projects to the state’s electrical grid.
The apparent stumbling block involves contract restrictions imposed by federal law, but utilities elsewhere in California have signed similar agreements with the agencies with few problems or delays.
“There’s 24-plus systems in the Southern California Edison area that have been installed in the last three years that we have not been able to negotiate an interconnection agreement on,” said Jack Williams, who retired this month as the National Park Service’s Oakland-based regional facilities manager. “We think we are close at times, but then nothing. We were successful with PG&E, but with Southern California Edison…. They have been a bit more difficult. We’ve raised the flag many times. It’s an issue for all federal agencies.”
An Edison spokesman declined to discuss the projects, citing ongoing negotiations.
Read the FULL story, twice. Still can’t figure out what the exact stumbling block is. The information on the federal requirements to be put into contracts is totally NON-informational.
Conclusion: just WHAT is the problem,
EXACTLY? …I have NO IDEA.
It’s most likely all about money. The utility company doesn’t want to pay for excess energy created by the parks so they can resell it at a higher profit.
Read the FULL story, twice. Still can’t figure out what the exact stumbling block is. The information on the federal requirements to be put into contracts is totally NON-informational.
Conclusion: just WHAT is the problem,
EXACTLY? …I have NO IDEA.
Why is the CA Public Utilities Commission not mentioned? They have the power to control what Edison does? Why were the projects built without a contract to be able to use the power on existing Edison lines? Why and over exactly what does Edison object? is it a valid reason?
blah blah
I agree with Robert on the article- not very good reporting. I would imagine that it involves with the bottom line for Edison which is typically corporate greed.