THIS IS AN ARCHIVE OF LAKE TAHOE NEWS, WHICH WAS OPERATIONAL FROM 2009-2018. IT IS FREELY AVAILABLE FOR RESEARCH. THE WEBSITE IS NO LONGER UPDATED WITH NEW ARTICLES.

Opinion: Demise of Kodak a good example of a free market


image_pdfimage_print

By Thomas Sowell

The news that Eastman Kodak is preparing to file for bankruptcy, after being the leading photographic company in the world for more than a hundred years, truly marks the end of an era.

The skills required to use the cameras and chemicals required by the photography of the mid-19th century were far beyond those of most people — until a man named George Eastman created a company called Kodak, which made cameras that ordinary people could use.

It was Kodak’s humble and affordable box Brownie that put photography on the map for millions of people, who just wanted to take simple pictures of family, friends and places they visited.

As the complicated photographic plates used by 19th century photographers gave way to film, Kodak became the leading film maker of the 20th century. But sales of film declined for the first time in 2000, and sales of digital cameras surpassed the sales of film cameras just 3 years later. Just as Kodak’s technology made older modes of photography obsolete more than a hundred years ago, so the new technology of the digital age has left Kodak behind.

Great names of companies in other fields have likewise vanished as new technology brought new rivals to the forefront, or else made the whole product obsolete, as happened with typewriters, slide rules and other products now remembered only by an older generation. That is what happens in a market economy and we all benefit from it as consumers.

Unfortunately, that is not what happens in government. The post office is a classic example. Post offices were once even more important than Eastman Kodak, and for a longer time, as the mail provided vital communications linking people and organizations across thousands of miles. But, today, technology has moved even further beyond the post office than it has beyond Eastman Kodak.

The difference is that, although the Postal Service is technically a private business, its income doesn’t cover all its costs — and taxpayers are on the hook for the difference.

Moreover, the government makes it illegal for anyone else to put anything into your mail box, even though you bought the mail box and it is your property. That means you don’t have the option to have some other private company deliver your mail.

In India, when private companies like Federal Express and United Parcel Service were allowed to deliver mail, the amount of mail delivered by that country’s post offices was cut in half between 2000 and 2005.

What should be the fate of the Postal Service in the United States? In a sense, no one really knows. Nor is there any reason why they should.

Thomas Sowell is a senior fellow at the Hoover Institute and author of The Housing Boom and Bust.

image_pdfimage_print

About author

This article was written by admin

Comments

Comments (7)
  1. dogwoman says - Posted: January 20, 2012

    Kodak did not evolve with the technology. Survival of the fittest and all.

  2. SmedleyButler says - Posted: January 20, 2012

    Kodak and the USPS have much in common to the “free market” vampire capitalists like uncky Tom Sowell. I’m sure Mittens too would approve of the dismantling of a successful company, firing all the higher paid loyal, hardworking and genius employees with benefits of any kind, selling super-profitable parts of the company, paying obscene salaries to several bloodsuckers, and then not caring a fig why bankruptcy is right around the corner and entire 2nd and 3rd generation middle-class communities are destroyed. USPS will be the same. Once every ounce of profitable infrastructure and available money has been acquired by the 1%ers, you’re on your own and good luck rube.

  3. dumbfounded says - Posted: January 21, 2012

    Awesome, Smedley. Now that vulture capitalism has been blessed by the 1% as “the way it is”, our country can continue it’s race to the bottom.

  4. Elie Alyeshmerni says - Posted: January 22, 2012

    Thank you Kae for including this article
    If Smedley had a chance to be exposed to these ideas he would in fact see the power and value of the free market and what
    made America great.

  5. sandsconnect says - Posted: January 31, 2012

    I grew up in Rochester and almost my whole family worked for Kodak. I remember my grandfather telling stories about George Eastman and what an excellent employer he was.

    Eastman funded so many museums and arts in our little city by the Lake. An amazing man and company Truly sad to see them go.

  6. sandsconnect says - Posted: January 31, 2012

    Free Market – LOL

    Your markets just got bailed out by our governement printing money and inflating your dollars (making most of us poorer by default).

    Too bad Kodak didn’t get bailed out they took care of thier own but all the jobs went to China and Japan.

  7. John says - Posted: January 31, 2012

    Now Smedley, I hate that I am agreeing with Dogwoman on this, but dude, you got some ‘splaining to do. How can you support a business that had all of the money in the world, but couldn’t make the leep to digital photography? And are you suggesting the government be forcing us to still use film?