Bills designed to address ADA-small business concerns
Two measures that would curtail frivolous Americans with Disabilities Act lawsuits and pinpoint conflicting state and federal ADA regulations were introduced this week by Assemblywoman Beth Gaines, R-Roseville.
Assembly Bill 187, would give California’s most vulnerable small businesses an opportunity to correct an ADA violation before a lawsuit can be filed. Once a business has received a written notice of violation, it would be given 120 days to bring the business into compliance.
Approximately 98 percent of California businesses are out of compliance with state and/or federal disability access laws.
The complex and inconsistent regulations regarding disability access make it difficult for willing business owners to comply with the complicated and changing regulations and give lawsuit abusers the opportunity to take advantage of the confusing laws. This is harmful to both individuals with a disability seeking access and businesses that are exposed to civil actions, Gaines said.
“The unfortunate reality is that there are individuals who are capitalizing on the complex access regulations enacted by the state and federal government for personal benefit,” Gaines said in a statement. “Businesses can be sued for thousands of dollars for simple faults such as a railing height being off by a centimeter or parking lot striping not being the right shade of a particular color. Many times, businesses want to correct the error to allow for more access to their place of business. These frivolous lawsuits are making it harder for the business to come into compliance, especially in this difficult economic environment.”
The other measure, Assembly Bill 1879, requires the state architect to compile a list of all federal and state disability access regulations and any conflicts in state and federal regulations must be identified.
There will be a meeting
March 15 at 6pm in Pollock Pines to discuss the ADA issues and how businesses in El Dorado County are being targeted by one attorney in particular.
The meeting will be at the Community Center.
For more information, call Kitty Miller at (530) 621.5651.
No good deed goes unpunished. But dog gone it, the ADA sure made a lot of people feel virteous.
Another example of a law that went too far as zealots overwhelmed common sense.
The road to hell is paved with good intentions.
The road to political success is paved with unintended consequences.
I would like to see a business take this attorney to court and successfully sue him for damages done to all the businesses he has unscrupulously gone after. Greed is his motive. It’s obvious by the manner in which he operates. He is not a hero to ADA. He is a criminal, taking advantage of the law.
Jenny: someone actually did win against this lawyer, yeah! Here is an interesting document http://www.adacrisis.com/images/Johnson_nature_of_suit_440_o.pdf that shows his 457 lawsuits. 4 of his initial lawsuits generated $115 million in demands! I had a friend in the valley get a letter from this Johnson character but I think he sent it to the wrong person (also a lawyer).
Here is the winner: http://www.northsacnews.com/articles/august-2009/local-business-owner-wins-ada-lawsuit
I’m all for easy access for the disabled. I just think it needs to be done fairly.