THIS IS AN ARCHIVE OF LAKE TAHOE NEWS, WHICH WAS OPERATIONAL FROM 2009-2018. IT IS FREELY AVAILABLE FOR RESEARCH. THE WEBSITE IS NO LONGER UPDATED WITH NEW ARTICLES.

Sierra water content 10 times less than what it was in 2011


image_pdfimage_print
Location

Elevation

Snow Depth

Water Content

% of Long Term Average

Alpha

7,600 feet

 19.4 inches

4.9  inches

18

Phillips Station

6,800 feet

17.7  inches

3.9  inches

16

Lyons Creek

6,700 feet

30.5  inches

8.3  inches

33

Tamarack Flat

6,500 feet

24  inches

6  inches

26

Source: DWR

By Kathryn Reed

PHILLIPS STATION – “In California we talk about averages and normal, but it doesn’t describe our weather well. We have more extremes.”

Tuesday’s snow survey compared to a year ago is an example of the extremes Frank Gehrke is talking about. On Feb. 28 the water content near the entrance of Sierra-at-Tahoe was 16 percent of normal compared to 178 percent of normal a year ago.

Gehrke, who measures the snow near Echo Summit five times a year for the state Department of Water Resources, won’t make any predictions about what March will bring. But to play catch up “we need a significant, major turn around in the storm track,” Gehrke said.

The snow depth was 17.7 inches, with 3.9 inches worth of water.

Frank Gehrke finds little snow to measure Feb. 28 near Sierra-at-Tahoe. Photo/Kathryn Reed

Years like this were also recorded in 1945, 1963 and 1991. In ’45 and ’91 the slow start was followed by a tremendous March. But history does not necessarily repeat itself.

“We’re not doing too well up here,” Gehrke said.

To those who don’t live in the area it might have been hard to believe Gehrke. He was breaking tracks as he snowshoed through fresh snow. Trees were covered with white stuff. A bitter wind whipped through the air and storm clouds passed overhead.

But snow in the Sierra has been scarce as the measurements show. Storms have been sporadic at best.

Normally the water content increases with the February measurement by 4 to 5 inches. In the past month it went up one-tenth of an inch.

There is so little snow, with so little water content that instead of measuring each of the stops along the route, Gehrke pours the collections into a bucket to be measured at the end.

“In shallow snowpacks it’s more accurate to weigh it in bulk,” he said.

While those in Tahoe know the dismal snowfall has created a cash-flow problem for most businesses in the region, the impact to the rest of California likely won’t be felt until this summer or later.

Reservoirs are doing OK based on runoff from last winter, but the State Water Project has reduced the amount of water it expects to deliver to entities down stream to 50 percent of their allocation. This is down from projections of 60 percent. Last year these 29 public agencies that service 25 million Californians and nearly a million acres of irrigated farmland received 80 percent of their allocation.

If the snowpack does not improve this year, water managers will need to think about how best to allocate resources for next year.

But March is trying to do its best to not be dry and disappointing. The winter storm warning issued by the National Weather Service is from 10pm Wednesday to noon Thursday – the first day of March. With it, expect 2 to 4 feet of snow above 7,000 feet and 12 to 30 inches below that elevation.

 

 

 

image_pdfimage_print

About author

This article was written by admin

Comments

Comments (7)
  1. Lisa says - Posted: February 29, 2012

    So why aren’t state officials already calling for conservation measures and going into “drought mode”? It isn’t like we don’t know this will regularly happen in California. We don’t know if this a one year event or the beginning of many years. Get it going already.

  2. dogwoman says - Posted: February 29, 2012

    Because the reserves are already at 110% of normal thanks to LAST year’s good precip and storage.

  3. dogwoman says - Posted: February 29, 2012

    Oh, I forgot to add, that our reservoirs are now used primarily for flood control rather than water storage. Our politicians allowed massive building of cheap housing tracts to be built in historical flood plains and now they have to protect those houses.
    Somebody was payin’ somebody off, and as usual, the politicians were extremely short sighted.

  4. sunriser2 says - Posted: February 29, 2012

    The Reno news said they rushed the study so they didn’t have to deal with the weather.

    I thought the point of the study was to measure the weather?

  5. dumbfounded says - Posted: February 29, 2012

    The mathematics does not add up…

  6. Hang Ups From Way Back says - Posted: February 29, 2012

    Oh yes they do, check Spuds mathematics, we got big water, you got little pay checks. We got Big Water Meters, You got Bigger BILLS.
    They HAPPY, YOU THRISTY, they retire ,you work for rest your life,THEY IN Hawaii soaking up the good life , YOU STUCK IN TAHOE Still trying to figure it all Out.
    Maui sunrises ,they happy “ALL TIME FOR AMERICA BOY From TAHOLE!Only 10 dollar for you ON SPEICAL SALES OFFER, HURRY NOW ,OFFER ENDS SOON!
    CHOW

  7. Dogula says - Posted: February 29, 2012

    ” YOU STUCK IN TAHOE Still trying to figure it all Out.”

    Hey Hangups, I agree with you on the point you’re trying to make, but that sentence just caught me. I mean, I can sure think of worse places to be STUCK! Can’t you? It’s a BEAUTIFUL day!