THIS IS AN ARCHIVE OF LAKE TAHOE NEWS, WHICH WAS OPERATIONAL FROM 2009-2018. IT IS FREELY AVAILABLE FOR RESEARCH. THE WEBSITE IS NO LONGER UPDATED WITH NEW ARTICLES.

Opinion: Measure B is bad for business


image_pdfimage_print

To the community,

The South Tahoe Chamber of Commerce opposes Measure B and the increase in taxes for any business at this time.

Measure B comes from the perspective of assessing a business greater taxes and fees based solely on the number of employees that business has. Gross receipts and number of employees are the indicators, without perspective of costs or true profit margins.

It removes the cap on business license fees, which means the more a business earns, the more it pays. While in theory that may sound attractive, there is no consideration for the expenses of paying employees a decent wage, nor does this consider the wide gap in profit margins. One large business may be paying to conform with new federal and state mandates, new local mandates, and have additional fees for upgrades to licenses, etc. A different kind of business may have a large number of employees, but none of these mandates, especially if they use contract employees.

A business in the city of South Lake Tahoe pays a business license fee, a county DBA fee, and must advertise at their expense to announce this DBA. They may have to pay an additional home occupation fee. If they also work in the county, there is a business license fee. If they sell or work with anyone who sells or gives away even ice, there are environmental reports to be filed. If they buy and resell items, there is a resell license fee. They pay liability and D O insurance. If they plan an event to promote their business, they pay the city for a permit. If they are a store front business, they have all the above expenses in addition to rent or property taxes if they own the building in which their business operates.

Some business owners pay original and renewable licensing or credential fees, as in Realtors, contractors, food handlers, health clearances, and often have to pay to take classes to stay current. Larger businesses pay benefit costs for their employees and state and federal taxes, including disability and social security. Many are also facing increased mandates by the state and federal governments.

All businesses in the city of South Lake Tahoe were hit this past year by the stated intent to enforce the sign ordinance. The council also enacted a new ordinance, the snow removal ordinance, which also adds to the cost of doing business in the city of South Lake Tahoe. It is also our concern that this does not create an attractive environment for large business to come to, or stay in, South Lake Tahoe.

It stands to reason that an increase in taxes and fees will either cause the business to close it’s doors, pull out of Tahoe, lay off or cut hours for more employees, or raise the rates to the consumers in South Lake Tahoe. More unemployed people or people with hours that have been cut mean less money to be spent in the smaller businesses in South Lake Tahoe. Locals keep some of these businesses alive in the shoulder seasons; where will that disposable income be if their hours are cut?

It is our belief that if the taxes and license fees are raised on these large businesses, more employees will lose their jobs. It also removes the cap on the fees, which in our estimation would result in higher fees for many businesses. Rate increases for consumers may also be a result.

Government must stop going to business to fund excessive expenditures. Please join the South Tahoe Chamber of Commerce and vote no on Measure B.

JoAnn Conner                David Kelly                       Danny Freeman           Dick Van Buskirk

President                         Executive  director           Past president              Board member at large

 

image_pdfimage_print

About author

This article was written by admin

Comments

Comments (9)
  1. grannylou says - Posted: March 5, 2012

    Good points!

  2. Steve says - Posted: March 5, 2012

    The Chamber is right. It is the shoppers and consumers who end up funding such unnecessary nonsense with higher prices forced by higher taxes.

    Raleys is already closing unprofitable stores. Don’t encourage the same to happen here. Vote “NO” on Measure B.

  3. Judi says - Posted: March 5, 2012

    In this awful economy, there should be no tax increases for businesses or individuals. Government should learn to work smarter, be more efficient & frugal in these tough times — just like the rest of us! Work with what you have — and quit trying to jerk more money out of everyone!

  4. John says - Posted: March 5, 2012

    I have never understood a tax on gross receipts. California sold this snake oil with there LLC tax. It penalizes high volume low margin businesses.

    Vote No!

  5. Perry R. Obray says - Posted: March 5, 2012

    The city sets a bad example of requesting businesses to do things they do not practice. The city does not do snow removal on enough paved city paths(bicycle/walking trails/paths. On top of not clearing it’s own paths used by tax paying residents to access food, health services, ect….., when the city does the bulk of the snow removal, they tend to botch the operation so bad there is ice on the paved pathway for weeks instead of until the next sunny day or so.

  6. Parker says - Posted: March 5, 2012

    After the Chamber was apparently getting behind the dumb parking meter idea, I’m glad to see they’re now opposing the City’s revenue schemes!

    The City is trying to sell this tax increase as some sort of fairness issue. But of course when the math is computed, it’s actually a tax increase. Hopefully it does not need to be explained what a bad idea that is in our weak economy.

    And if the City then cries that they’re broke and desperately need the money, I refer everyone to their employee’s pay, compensation and retirement packages!

  7. Harold Krammer says - Posted: March 5, 2012

    I,m glad someone brought up the parking meters.The council after agreeingto the idea, flip-floped because 40 people went to a meeting and complained.40 people,when thousands of people where disturbed by snow globe that was ok because of some bogus numbers the city came up with about bussines etc. Why not parking meters? Oh I know 40 people who live in the keys,have lake front homes, own beaches and marinas complained. With parking meters everyone pays equaly,fare deal.
    No on B,Yes on parking meters.

  8. sandsconnect says - Posted: March 7, 2012

    What does parking meaters and measure B have to do with SnowGlobe? Dude get over it, people had fun, sorry you didn’t. Sorry you can’t be inconvienenced so others can have a great time and local businesses can make money.

  9. Hang Ups From Way Back says - Posted: March 7, 2012

    Dirtyheads were excellent last night @ Blue, Sand..
    No phone calls to the MAYOR!LOL