THIS IS AN ARCHIVE OF LAKE TAHOE NEWS, WHICH WAS OPERATIONAL FROM 2009-2018. IT IS FREELY AVAILABLE FOR RESEARCH. THE WEBSITE IS NO LONGER UPDATED WITH NEW ARTICLES.

S. Lake Tahoe operating in the black despite TOT shortfall


image_pdfimage_print

By Kathryn Reed

Even though hotel taxes are down considerably because people stayed away from the barren ski slopes, South Lake Tahoe’s midyear budget report was positive.

“We are living within our means,” City Manager Tony O’Rourke told the council April 17. “We no longer have financial icebergs looming.”

A year ago the council created a five-year budget, plus business and strategic plans designed to put the city on stable ground, improve infrastructure and move the city into the 21st century. Those measures appear to have righted the listing mother ship to put its 23,000 residents on a voyage filled with fewer rough seas.

While the city is not financially out of the woods because it is dependent on tourism and many properties are bank owned, O’Rourke believes the bottom has been reached and things are on the upswing.

“We need to continue to make an investment in the community,” O’Rourke said.

That is why $ 3 million is being put into a capital improvement program reserve. This is coming from the city’s undesignated reserve fund. That pot of money per city ordinance is to be at 25 percent of the general fund and has grown to about 36 percent – thus the reason money can be reallocated.

South Tahoe’s three main sources of income are property tax (22 percent of the budget), TOT (16 percent), and sales tax (11 percent).

MaryAnne Brand, interim director of finance, said projections in property taxes are for growth to be 1.5 to 2 percent each of the next five years.

But she told Lake Tahoe News after the Tuesday meeting, “It’s a moving target, it’s so volatile, but no major changes are expected.”

A chunk, though, of property taxes that could go away in two years is what’s being collected from the would-be convention center site. Through the Teeter law the city for five years is entitled to its $350,000 worth of property taxes from the county even though the owners are not paying their bill. Technically, now the successor agency to the Redevelopment Agency receives that cash. It goes to pay debts associated with redevelopment.

The drop-in visitors to the area during the winter have reduced the projected hotel tax by $298,000. The dissolution of the Redevelopment Agency compounds the lack of projected TOT to date to $573,000.

Councilman Tom Davis, who is part owner of Tahoe Keys Resort, said bookings for the three summer months are higher than a year ago. This could swing the TOT pendulum in the other direction.

With the dissolution of the Redevelopment Agency per state order, the city received a little more than $1 million from the housing segment to be used in the general fund. This money is offsetting the losses in the 2011-12 budget so there is a temporary surplus of $145,029.

This “extra” cash also compensates for the loss of $278,000 in projected income from beach parking. That plan was derailed earlier this year.

Changes in expenses that were approved Tuesday include taking the savings from eliminating the fire marshal position and unfreezing two firefighter positions; reclassifying the community outreach-volunteer coordinator to marketing and outreach coordinator; making the PIO the assistant to the city manager; and bumping the deputy city attorney up a rung.

O’Rourke said the reclassifications are to reflect what the people in those positions are actually doing.

Another unforeseen expense was the $30,000 to repair the compressors at the ice rink. While a private company operates the arena, the current lease has the city being responsible for certain maintenance issues. The contract with TSE is slated to be back before the council on May 1.

In other city news:

• City Manager Tony O’Rourke, while having interviewed for a job in southern Oregon, told Lake Tahoe News it is probably not the best fit. He plans to do the job in South Tahoe for the foreseeable future.

• The old 56-acre steering committee will be reconvened in May, with topics to include El Dorado County’s desire to rename Lakeview Commons and what to do with the campground side of the project.

• The city Planning Commission approved a design change for the driveway for the Raley’s gas station because the landlord of the larger center wanted $10,000 a month for use of their property.

 

image_pdfimage_print

About author

This article was written by admin

Comments

Comments (11)
  1. Steve says - Posted: April 18, 2012

    It is about time city government came closer to living within its means. Despite all the special tax increases, surcharges, and extra fees just for city residents, businesses, and property owners.

    And it is doubtful the County is pleased to be left on the short end with property taxes now uncollected and unpaid at the foolish City Hole. Either way, taxpayers and residents end up paying for this fiasco.

  2. 4-mer-usmc says - Posted: April 18, 2012

    Good move by the Planning Commission and City Council to approve the design change for the Raley’s gas station driveway thus thwarting that property owner’s $10,000 monthly extortion payment for use of an already existing driveway, which unfortunately delayed the opening of that business. That type of elitist property owner’s attitude of “I’ve got mine now I’ll charge you up the *ss if you want to use my driveway”, with no regard or consideration for what may help the community via additional revenues and jobs is selfish and destructive. I find that degree of greed astounding and the amazing thing is that Raley’s is that property owner’s/shopping center’s anchor tenant. Classic example of putting one’s own wealth over working together for the benefit of the community.

  3. tahoeadvocate says - Posted: April 18, 2012

    The city allowed hotel TAUs to be transferred from South Lake Tahoe to Edgewood Properties in Nevada. If those TAUs had been transferred to someone in the city to build another motel they would have TOT revenue but now the potential is lost.

  4. Parker says - Posted: April 18, 2012

    Well that’s good news! Now they won’t have to raise our taxes. And they can tell the SLTPD to stop pulling over every car they see driving late night (which they were back to doing a couple weekends ago) as such a shameless revenue grab isn’t necessary!

  5. Tahoan says - Posted: April 18, 2012

    More raises? Maybe they shouldn’t have cut so many non-duplicated positions and really showed community support. And quit asking for new taxes and money for parking from the residents.

  6. Harold Krammer says - Posted: April 18, 2012

    Amazing,at the previous council meeting, member A.S said that more cuts would have to be made to city workers benefits because of budget problems and two weeks later Tonystoadies get raises.Everyone left working for the city took on extra duties without compensation(except directors) .Why? Great news, City manager cant find a job anÿplace else so he’ll stay here.

  7. sunriser2 says - Posted: April 18, 2012

    Great job, Looks like we still have a ways to go.

    The property tax issue isn’t behind us yet. The property taxes we paid April 10th were calculated off of values as of January 1st 2010. We all know how much values have dropped since then.

    Still makes me sick to think about how much money the city squandered from 1999-2008.

    Just think about all the sales tax on every truck that pulled out of Meeks Lumber.

  8. JoeStirumup says - Posted: April 18, 2012

    FROM THE ARTICLE

    ‘MaryAnne Brand, interim director of finance, said projections in property taxes are for growth to be 1.5 to 2 percent each of the next five years.’

    The property values are going down but the tax revenues will go up???

    How does that work???

  9. JoeStirumup says - Posted: April 18, 2012

    MORE FROM THE ARTICLE

    “With the dissolution of the Redevelopment Agency per state order, the city received a little more than $1 million from the housing segment to be used in the general fund. This money is offsetting the losses in the 2011-12 budget so there is a temporary surplus of $145,029.”

    …so there is a one million dollar one time windfall that is covering an 850,000 shortfall … that doesn’t sound so good to me…

  10. JoeStirumup says - Posted: April 18, 2012

    NOT FROM THE ARTICLE

    There are millions of dollars in unfunded liabilities related to retirement benefits not carried on the books…

    This is due to the corrupt accounting standards our government has been using…

    So…

    Where is the honesty in this reporting???

  11. JoeStirumup says - Posted: April 18, 2012

    Are Americans stupid or do they just have their heads in the sand?

    IT WON’T GO AWAY JUST BECAUSE YOU IGNORE THE FACTS PEOPLE.

    YOU LET YOUR GOVERNMENT LIE TO YOU! WHY?