Dissecting demographics key to knowing Tahoe visitors
By Kathryn Reed
STATELINE – Paying attention to what the population looks like is critical to knowing who to market Tahoe to.
That was the overriding message of Emilyn Sheffield. She was one of two presenters at the annual Lake Tahoe Visitors Authority-Lake Tahoe South Shore Chamber of Commerce tourism conference on Thursday.
Sheffield, who is a professor at CSU Chico, also brought 20 of her students to the South Shore. They spent several days in the area essentially testing the tourist product.
The other speaker was Ralf Garrison, director of MTRiP – Mountain Travel Research Program. Much of the information was the same that he delivered at the Mountain Travel Symposium at the Resort at Squaw Creek earlier this month.
The two-hour event April 26 at Harveys drew a crowd of about 100 people.
Using information from the Census to project trends in demographics, Sheffield said it’s important tourism leaders in Lake Tahoe realize that California’s population by 2020 is expected to be 41 percent Latino, 37 percent Anglo and 12.5 percent Asian.
She said while Tahoe has relied on Anglos in the past, this cannot continue unless the region wants to be an exclusive enclave.
Sheffield added that while the Tahoe South website redesign looks good, it needs more.
“You only see Anglos. You need more diversity of photos and more diversity of spokespeople,” Sheffield said. Too many white people on the website was her complaint. People who travel want to see people who like them doing what they might do in whatever location it is.
Sheffield added that growth in the Asian market could be good because historically they are interested in gaming. But she said Hispanics overall don’t like the snow, so it’s good the area has four seasons.
Sheffield suggested three things for the South Shore to focus on:
• Recapture the Baby Boomers by reconnecting with them through their values of peace, love and harmony with nature. She added that if hotels are not pet-friendly, they would lose this group.
• Rethink what accommodations are like. Boomers and Hispanics are traveling not as couples, but multigenerational. This means two rooms, two bathrooms in a single unit. Sheffield said they tend to rent houses instead of condos. With the Latinos, they like to go places where people know how to speak Spanish.
• While the millennials have meager means today, they are the future. “Expect them to be loyal,” Sheffield said. That’s why they should be lured to Tahoe today. She said they may only have $200 to spend in a weekend, but they will spend it all. Hostel-like accommodations may be the answer for lodging, then the rest will be spent on food and entertainment. And for this generation, make sure there are enough plugs for all of their digital devices.
Garrison pointed out how tourism businesses need to look beyond the traditional people they market to. He said a resort in the Tahoe area during January had an 80 percent spike in ski school business – when there was no snow.
The resort was attracting beginner skiers who felt safe to drive the mountain roads.
“So it shows there are different ways to market,” Garrison said.
SnowGlobe! lol
Maybe we should have all he street signs in Spanish and Asian too, god help us if we are not politicly correct.
What needs to be done is have more ability to get to the Lake and use the beaches.
Using information from the Census to project trends in demographics, Sheffield said it’s important tourism leaders in Lake Tahoe realize that California’s population by 2020 is expected to be 41 percent Latino, 37 percent Anglo and 12.5 percent Asian.
So where’s the figures for the African Americans?
We got have some James brown “The big payback” that song tells the story.
It’s cheaper to get a room than to camp.
Peace, love and harmony with nature.
Traffic jams,control burns,200 bucks won’t get you out Raleys with 3 good bottles wine and a pack Hebrew Nationals.THEN YOU GOT HAVE CASH FOR PARKING,GAS TO GET HOME!
Visitors Authority-Lake Tahoe South Shore Chamber of Commerce tourism conference NEEDS TO HURRY BACK TO THE DRAWING BOARD FOR A BETTER IDEA.
I’M A LOCAL AND I HAVE A HELL HARD TIME NOT TO SPEND AT LEAST 400.00 ON A NORMAL WEEKEND.
‘Dissecting demographics’ has probably been done ad nauseum over the past decades, with no regard for psychographics, a deeper look at the reasons why people might want to visit Tahoe.
I agree with the Baby Boomer comments, but perhaps with a different take . . . corporate owners seem to want to emphasize higher demographics (i.e., more disposable income – known at various times as ‘high-rollers’, ‘whales’, etc.) but they are not what built clientele for the more entrepreneurial Bill & Harvey – it was the average person who cherished being able to “get away” to a place like Tahoe.
That they were going to be entertained as they could not in the area they resided, then the lure of the mountains, the lake, the “food, fun, & fortune” (in Harvey’s lingo) had a strong allure.
In recent times the message has been mixed, with lackluster attempts to entertain, attractions geared too much to the same millenials w/ “meager means”, presumably to increase the buzz & excitement of youthful energy, while continuing to lament their own industry.
Enticing larger numbers here will take a unified front, which has not been in existence amidst all the chagrin about what is to happen next. This is a powerful indictment that no one knows what comes next, leaving the impression that confidence is nil. . .
Has changing the name Gaming Alliance to South Tahoe Association of Resorts (S.T. A.R.) meant anything but more obscurity (?)
Not a good omen. . .as hospitality requires a certain confidence in being able to show guests a good time. . .