Mammoth Lakes in water rights fight with L.A. utility
By Louis Sahagun, Los Angeles Times
MAMMOTH LAKES — The people of this small High Sierra ski town have survived drought, forest fires and earthquakes. They have endured economic recessions and volcano scares. But nothing in their history prepared them for the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power.
The DWP launched a legal attack six months ago for control of the city’s primary source of water, Mammoth Creek, which tumbles down the slopes through town. The utility contends it has owned the water since 1905 and Mammoth Lakes has been poaching for decades.
The tiny Mammoth Community Water District says that if it loses the lawsuits, the district would have to buy water from the DWP. That would force the district to raise average rates to levels many locals cannot afford — increasing them by at least 100%, to about $840 a year, one district official said.
The 7,700 year-round residents are largely working-class employees catering to vacationers who travel 300 miles north from Los Angeles. Forty percent are low-income.
Greg Norby, manager of the water district, said the DWP is using the lawsuits to intimidate his agency, hoping it will yield on the water rather than pay for a costly court battle. The district has already run up about $300,000 in legal expenses in the case, he said.
Water rights should be local. Los Angeles bleed off water destined for Mono Lake which caused it to drop by 10s of feet. Who knew they need Mammoth Lakes water too. Maybe they should have been self supporting and limited growth.
Yes tahoeadvocate..water should remain local and so should rules governing how we use our water. We in Tahoe should not have to install meters because the rest of California is drying up.
Might is right. Power comes at the end of a legal brief.
LADWP never changes. Their shameful history of deceit and greed in the Owens Valley continues.