USFS reissues Camp Rich upgrade proposal
By Kathryn Reed
Parking on the road leading to the Beacon restaurant is no longer part of the U.S. Forest Service’s plans when it overhauls the Camp Richardson area.
A group of homeowners along Jameson Road had protested the original proposal, which brought a halt to the process, withdrawal of the earlier decision and forced the Forest Service to reconvene.
The houses are beyond the marina, but the way to access them is via the same road one uses for the restaurant. There is also a question as to who owns that road.
Another environmental analysis is back on the street for a 30-day comment period that ends March 15.
“Based on subsequent discussions and analysis, the Forest Service has concluded that resolving concerns surrounding day use parking along Jameson Beach Road is important and that these actions need to be considered in more detail and in a broader scope. Appropriately addressing the retrofit of these resort areas and the 75 parking spaces for day use beach users will need to consider the reconfiguration of the area west of Jameson Beach Road,” Daniel Cressy, USFS landscape architect and recreation planner, told Lake Tahoe News. “The retrofit of circulation and day use parking along Jameson Beach Road is outside of the scope of the current project and is not considered in detail at this time.”
The residents are not completely thrilled with what the Forest Service is doing by not including Jameson Road in the revised plan.
“In a message to me, a USFS representative indicated that the U.S. Forest Service has ‘scaled back’ the project to only address BMP campground issues thereby ‘allowing further time to discuss residents’ concerns regarding Jameson Beach Road.’ This too overlooks that the residents have been not only willing, but trying to engage the USFS in discussions for at least three years in hopes of amicably resolving the issues, yet to date the USFS has failed to engage in any meaningful discussions,” Jacqueline Mittelstadt, attorney for the Jameson Beach Association, told Lake Tahoe News. “We will scrutinize carefully the new proposed project and EA. Hopefully, their second try is a better try.”
The project’s goals for these three South Shore campgrounds that are on both sides of Highway 89 include substantial upgrades for overnight guests, improved traffic flow for all motorists, installation of erosion control measures, and better access for those with disabilities.
Improvements include replacing the four bathrooms with seven ADA accessible facilities, adding bear-proof dumpsters and food lockers, upgrading utilities, installing barbecues at all campsites, and adding fire hydrants for the area.
The total area to be addressed is 79 acres.
Other proposed improvements include more paved bike trails, a restroom near the beach, and replacing fencing between Camp Richardson Resort and Pope Beach Road.
Four alternatives are in the environmental document. The preferred alternative includes the possible remove of 40 trees with a 30-inch diameter and 910 trees smaller than that.
Work could be begin this building season. All the work is estimated to take five years. As work is being done, the public won’t have access to certain areas.
Comments may be submitted electronically to comments-pacificsouthwest-ltbmu@fs.fed.us. For more information, contact Daniel Cressy or Matt Dickinson at (530) 543.2694, or go online.
So what’s the deal with the cross walk? From outside appearances the property seems to be very successful but fails to flag traffic (except for the CHP during the renaissance).
They cause massive traffic jams in both directions including in and out of their own drive way. Do they need to put a couple of employees through flagging school? How much could this cost $10.00 an hour for five or six hours a day on 16 weekends?
The promoters at El Dorado Beach claim to be losing tens of thousands of dollars and Camp Rich can’t pitch in to keep the highway open?