Lake Tahoe Basin lacks policy about beavers
Kathryn Reed
No one is counting the beavers in the Lake Tahoe Basin. No one knows if the population is growing, decreasing or has stayed stagnant through the decades. No one is even managing them.
But anyone who wants to touch the beavers’ habitat or potentially do anything to the water they are building dams in, well, there are plenty of agencies to take your money, delay your desires and bog down the process with paperwork.
While the meeting on April 19 hosted by the Lahontan Water Quality Control Board in South Lake Tahoe was civil, the message was – don’t mess with beaver habitat without first asking. Who to ask, well, that is a bit murky. The overriding response: Start with Lahontan.

Beavers create dams like this one in Taylor Creek which then prevent the free flow of water. Photo/LTN file
It was also abundantly clear that the officials – U.S. Forest Service, Lahontan, California Department of Fish and Wildlife, Tahoe Regional Planning Agency and U.S. Army Corp of Engineers – are not all on the same page as to what people should do, what the most effective means of dealing with problematic beavers is, and what can be done.
Data about beavers along the Upper Truckee River go back to the 1970s, Sarah Muskopf with the USFS said. But she didn’t provide any of that data.
“Regarding specific policies (for beavers), we don’t have any,” she said.
Muskopf said the Forest Service mostly cares about beavers in terms of public safety and infrastructure.
Sue Novasel, who has lived on the shores of the river for decades, said she has noticed a lot more beaver activity lately.
“I don’t want these beautiful animals harmed. I want more education,” she told the group.
Shelly Blair with Fish and Wildlife said, “We don’t have a formal outreach program.”
The Sierra Wildlife Coalition was in the audience and provided advice the panel didn’t have. Abrasive paint the color of a particular tree can thwart beavers from chewing it down. Sometimes wire-mesh fencing works. Removing dams is a short-term fix. Installing flow devices can get the water moving.
But those devices might require a permit from one or more of the agencies at the meeting – and maybe others.
It was pointed out it’s easier to get a permit to kill a beaver than it is to get a permit to extract a dam or put in a device that would alter the flow of the waterway. Blair with Fish and Wildlife agreed, but said all she can do is follow the law.
Edwin James with the Carson Water Subconservancy District was one of nearly 40 people at the Friday meeting. He lamented that maybe he should not have attended the discussion because now he knows he’s supposed to have a permit to remove a dam.
What he took issue with is that a dam could be discovered one day, needs to be taken out immediately, but permitting could take months. The water he is dealing with is going to farmers and ranchers in the Carson Valley. (Lahontan has jurisdiction there.)
Alan Miller with Lahontan said it’s possible a more general permit could be issued from his agency instead of needing one for each dam. No time line was provided.
Patrick Stone, senior wildlife and fisheries biologist with TRPA, admitted the fastest a permit would be issued is three months, but it’s likely an 18-month process.
The cows would have died of thirst by then, so it’s good cattle don’t graze in the basin any more.
Kris Hansen with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers said her agency is looking into regional permits regarding beavers, but none would be available this summer.
Several people at the meeting wanted solutions for how to deal with beavers – something other than killing them.
Brendan Ferry with the El Dorado County Department of Transportation said beavers caused problems after his agency restored part of Angora Creek.
“We were forced into killing it. A lot of us in the office didn’t want to go that way. But we felt we had to,” Ferry said.
Blair with the state said relocation is not an option because of “biological reasons.”
TRPA’s Stone said putting a beaver in another habitat would be like dropping one of the people in the room in the middle of China. (This reporter has been to China, did fine, came back to the U.S. healthy, and still doesn’t understand his analogy.)
Stone said there is evidence beavers were native to the basin, were trapped to the point of not existing, and then intentionally re-introduced.
(This reporter has been to China, did fine, came back to the U.S. healthy, and still doesn’t understand his analogy)
The analogy is a good one. You did not stay there, nor did you belong there…Much like your opinion being part of this article.
Much of what the panelists said didn’t make sense because there is no policy.
The China comment really was off the mark and was a good example of what appears to be an infantile understanding of how species live, interact, adapt and co-exist within their environment, with other species and humans.
There is no mention of what the purpose of the meeting was and how people knew about it. How did people get invited? Was there a meeting announcement?
This was on LTN announcing the meeting: https://www.laketahoenews.net/2013/04/forum-to-focus-on-beavers-in-the-basin/.
Plus, it was on LTN’s Events Calendar.
LTN staff
One more thing Scott. You say “you didn’t belong there” to the person who wrote this and has been to China. Does that mean you are anti-immigration? Because people move to other countries all the time. Lots of Americans live in China. You are making as much sense as the TRPA dude.
Has anyone asked the beavers how all these agencies rules are affecting their ablitity to apply Nature’s Policies?
Once again, too many ineffective, overlapping bureaucrats all bumping into each other with their competing rules, regulations, fees, and jurisdictions. The beavers probably have more productive meetings on how to deal with the bureaucrats.
I couldn’t attend the meeting, so I appreciate the article. It is much more thorough than the T’s. I hope the forum gives insight and motivation to create clear and humane methods to deal with the busy beaver. There were two dead beaver near where the Upper Truckee River empties into the lake. One was decapitated. I’m sure unnatural and illegal. These occurred in separate months. People will do the right thing if the agencies can work together to create policy that is clear, efficient, and sensible. I love seeing beaver–anything that tells me we are living in harmony with the natural world. The key is harmony.
Hey People ! ! ! When Kathryn Reed says : “Taking a beaver away from his or her home, and relocating the beaver, would be like taking a person to the middle of China, and leaving the person there to fend for themselves; She isn’t thinking of a tourist visiting China. If we, as tourists decide to visit China, we would prepare and study the region we intend to visit. Can you imagine being taken to the middle of China when you were 18 years old, unprepared for the trip, and being left there all alone ? Then in addition, you had no way of returning home, or knowing where your home is. Wake up people. This is the way Kathryn Reed is attempting to show you how cruel it could be to relocate a beaver. You need to think a little bit beyond your own perspective and consider what it would be like if you were an animal taken away from a place you considered home. I think Kathryn Reed’s example using China is a good example.
Can someone who attended this meeting objectively explain who called this meeting, why and what subject matter was discussed? Thank you.
Kelly,
Lahontan called the meeting. This is the event notice that explains why: https://www.laketahoenews.net/2013/04/forum-to-focus-on-beavers-in-the-basin/
LTN staff
What’s next? Sounds like nothing was accomplished? Any future meetings? Case closed?
Most agencies seemed to be alluding to a more generalized permit to address the issue (regional permit, general permit). This can be a excellent beginning, but with so many agencies involved, if even a single agency holds up the process (for whatever reason) nothing will get done on the ground. A coordinated permit process amongst all agencies might be the best way to go.
have lived in the county for 37 years. El Dorado county for years and years has a guy that comes up from below in a white county truck and his job is to exterminate beavers. possibly they have stopped this in the last few years, and thats why you see them again, but make no mistake this, this is how they did it or possibly still do.
One reason that the agencies aren’t all on the same page is that beaver policy and information is evolving – around the country not just in California. USFS in Utah has specifically implemented a beaver policy because they recognize the animals are so important to habitat. Idaho Audubon paid for a local beaver count because the animals are so important to birds. Beavers are promoted by NOAA as essential to salmonids. They are even being considered as a surrogate species at the National level.
No one tracks beaver populations anywhere in the entire country, or (since depredation permits aren’t issued per beaver) knows how many are killed each year. But we know flow devices solve problems, and we know beavers benefit wildlife and birds and we know that beavers belong in the sierras.
Heidi Perryman
Worth A Dam