THIS IS AN ARCHIVE OF LAKE TAHOE NEWS, WHICH WAS OPERATIONAL FROM 2009-2018. IT IS FREELY AVAILABLE FOR RESEARCH. THE WEBSITE IS NO LONGER UPDATED WITH NEW ARTICLES.

Hwy. 50 corridor housing boom about to begin


image_pdfimage_print

By Hudson Sangree, Sacramento Bee

Plans to build more than 10,000 homes across the dry, rolling foothills south of Highway 50 in Folsom are shifting into high gear in response to a housing market that has gone from “zero to 60” in a matter of months, housing experts said.

The 3,500-acre swath of cattle-grazing land that the city of Folsom annexed last year is one of the largest and most anticipated areas for residential construction in the Sacramento region. The market turnaround in the past year has renewed momentum for plans to build there.

“People were muddling through, and then we went from zero to 60, and everybody’s trying to do it at once,” said Greg Paquin, head of the Folsom-based Gregory Group, a home industry consultant.

Late last month, the New Home Co., based in Southern California, announced it had bought 431 acres of the former Russell Ranch from a partnership controlled by longtime developer Angelo K. Tsakopoulos. The price was not disclosed.

Lake Tahoe is a selling point to future home owners of what is now barren land. Photo/Paul Kitagaki Jr./Sacramento Bee

Lake Tahoe is a selling point to future home owners of what is now barren land. Photo/Paul Kitagaki Jr./Sacramento Bee

The company intends to build 900 homes on hillsides with sweeping views that extend to the Sacramento skyline, Folsom Lake and the Sierra. The goal is to start preparing the land next year and begin building by the end of 2015, said Kevin Carson, New Home’s Northern California president.

When the deal closed, Carson took the company’s two dozen employees up a gravel road to a windswept hilltop to celebrate.

“I told everyone that their children’s children’s children, when they drive to Lake Tahoe, are going to look at those hillsides,” Carson said. “It’s a very prominent location in the most desirable area in the region. From a home builder’s standpoint, it’s the absolute best location.”

The company’s plans call for homes to look west across the Central Valley to the Coast Ranges, with jogging and biking paths following natural swales and connecting to a 3-acre community and recreation center.

“We’ll be working with the topography instead of against it,” said Ashley Feeney, the company’s vice president for land and planning. On a tour of the site last week, he and Carson threaded their way among cow patties, keeping a lookout for rattlesnakes amid the rock outcroppings.

Part of the challenge of housing thousands of residents in the parched landscape has been securing a reliable water supply.

Tsakopoulos, who bought up thousands of acres of ranchland south of Highway 50 with an eye toward future development, once quipped that the area was so barren “jackrabbits carry their own lunch.”

Earlier plans called for water to be piped in from the Natomas Central Mutual Water Co., which serves farms miles away in northern Sacramento County and southern Sutter County. But the plan was expensive – buying the water and piping it to Folsom was expected to cost $250 million.

The city of Folsom has since approved a plan to provide the water from its own supply, said city spokeswoman Sue Ryan. Landowners have agreed to pay an estimated $52 million for facilities to treat and convey the water, she said.

The plan does not violate the terms of Measure W, which prohibited reducing the water available for current residents, said Folsom City Manager Evert Palmer. That’s because the city expects to cut water consumption by 20 percent in coming years under state conservation mandates. The excess supply would be diverted to the new south area, he said.

That water will help green the landscaping of more than 300 acres of parks and schools, 1,400 acres of residential development and 500 acres of commercial, industrial and office space, Ryan said. The project is expected to create 13,000 jobs.

Folsom’s growth south of Highway 50 has been considered inevitable since 2004, when residents approved Measure W, which imposed conditions on development but did not bar it from proceeding. One provision required that 30 percent of the land remain in open space.

At that time, Tsakopoulos and his investment partners controlled much of the land, but as development grew closer in recent months, buyers have snapped up major parcels.

Westland Capital Partners, based in neighboring El Dorado Hills, bought 960 acres of the former Mangini ranch from Tsakopoulos in October and closed on 760 acres of the former Carpenter Ranch from another seller in March, said Bill Bunce, the firm’s president.

Altogether, Westland could build more than 5,600 housing units on its properties along with commercial and light-industrial uses, he said.

Bunce declined to disclose the purchase prices, and the sales figures were not readily available last week from public records.

Land appraiser Dave Jarrette said he wasn’t involved in the deals, which often come with confidentiality clauses, but said he could offer an educated estimate at the selling prices. He said land in the annexation area sold for about $5,000 an acre decades ago but lately has been going for $25,000 to $50,000 an acre.

“The stuff south of 50 wasn’t selling for much 20 years ago,” Jarrette said. “Development was too far off.” Now, with site development only a year away, “it’s a near-term deal,” he said. “That’s why they paid the price.”

Paquin said Folsom, his hometown, and areas of Placer County in Roseville and Rocklin are considered prime building spots because of jobs, incomes and amenities. The houses that New Home Co. plans to build will be part of an area with good schools, family-oriented services, and miles of recreation trails, he said.

“I think south of 50 is a fantastic opportunity,” Paquin said. “It’s clearly a place where people want to live.”

image_pdfimage_print

About author

This article was written by admin

Comments

Comments (7)
  1. Gus says - Posted: June 12, 2013

    This enormous urbanization project will negatively affect the drive experience for visitors headed to Tahoe. I’m really going to miss the loss of wide-open range land — which is a disappearing part of our California heritage. But people have to live somewhere and money needs to be made…

  2. Horse tails says - Posted: June 13, 2013

    There goes the neighborhood!!!!

  3. Jenny says - Posted: June 13, 2013

    The foothills create a wall, catching smog & air pollution moving west. When we drive down the hill from Tahoe to the valley, we’re saddened by the brown air blanketing the valley, (and super-excited when we can actually see the tall buildings of downtown Sac). With 10,000 more families impacting the corridor, air quality is going to get a lot worse.
    Also, with the ‘water wars’ and thirst of California, Folsom is super-optimistic thinking conservation will allow them to provide water to all of these homes. Will be interesting to see if the developers and HOA encourage natural landscaping.
    On the bright side, Folsom has been great in planning outdoor recreational bike trails. Hopefully they will continue planning ways people can commute via bike or light rail.

  4. ljames says - Posted: June 13, 2013

    this is not inevitable – and these houses arent being built because people need a place to live, it’s about boom and bust real estaate speculation – yes people need a place to live, but suburban sprawl and hop-scotch development ruins both cities and the rural landscape and cuases us to import more and more food from other countries (anyone read the country of origin labels on supermarket produce lately??)- and low growth also means population control – some folks should try it!

  5. Old Long Skiis says - Posted: June 13, 2013

    10,000 new homes outside Folsom on those dry rolling hils? This is another boom and bust just like has happened so many times before. Where’s the jobs to support these new homeowners that will undoubtably have a huge house payment? Where’s the water to irrigate this dry land and quench the thirst of the residents in a VERY hot locale.
    I’ve seen this happen on So. Shore several times over the years. Home prices start to climb and everyone gets anxious to buy a home while they still can before the prices become too high. Or in the case of the developer a way to make some big bucks and then laugh all the way to the bank.
    Deregulation of banks and lending insituitions doing shady deals loaning money to people who obviously can’t afford the payments. The new home owner is told, “Oh, you can refinance before your rate goes up”, the real estate agent and bank will tell their unsuspecting sucker, er’ I mean “client”. We saw how that worked out with forclosures at an all time high nation wide.
    These developements will go thru just as sure as the sun will come up tommorow. As the economy is still staggering the new home owner sits in his living room, his house under water, hs savings depleted, scratching his head saying “what just happened?”.
    Good luck, Old Long Skiis

  6. Old Long Skiis says - Posted: June 13, 2013

    May I suggest rather than buying a new home off the hill, the prospective buyer look into our ample supply of older homes right here at the lake. Good prices, beautiful area with lots of recreation, good schools, clean air, the best water you’ve ever tasted and NO FREEWAYS.
    Some of these homes are “fixer uppers” but there are plenty of construction outfits that will gladly upgrade your Tahoe home. Double pane windows, an efficient wood stove and some landscaping with native plants (and of course a vegatable garden!)
    There’s lots of good honest Real estate brokers in town as well as a good local bank that will get you on your way to becoming a Tahoe local.
    So what have you done by buying here in Tahoe?
    #1 You’re now living in what is “one of the fairest places the whole Earth affords” as once spoken by Mark Twain.
    #2 You’re helping our economy by adding to our tax base and bolstering businesses by shopping locally.
    #3 You’ve become part of a community that is close knit, takes care of one another in times of need and to top it off, you saved yourself a bundle load of cash by moving to Lake Tahoe.
    It’s a win-win situation all the way around. Old Long Skiis

  7. 4-mer-usmc says - Posted: June 14, 2013

    Skiis,

    I think the idea of buying in Tahoe is great and believe that this is the best place on the planet to live. Now all we need are more living wage jobs besides those at the LTUSD, LTCC, STPUD, STR, EDC, the City, or Barton so more people can afford to buy and live here while working at one job instead of needing two or more minimum wage jobs, the majority of which are temporary, driven by the success or failure of the tourist seasons, and have no benefits.

    While recreation will always be a huge part of the economic driver in Tahoe we need to add employment diversity for the locals that will pay living wages other than those at school districts, utility companies, government, and the hospital and to do that requires the sophisticated infrastructure of fiber optics for greater broadband to accommodate diversified industries so they can locate to Tahoe and provide living wage jobs. An organization called the Tahoe Prosperity Center has recognized that this is the real key to opening the opportunity for economic diversity and has made this their mission. I know for certain that the City of Palo Alto constructed this infrastructure in 1985 so Tahoe is many, many years behind and it is my sincere hope that the Tahoe Prosperity Center is successful in this endeavor. This would be good for existing businesses, new businesses, the local residents, and our economy and is what we need to better prosper. We can’t race a 1960’s muscle car against a current dragster and expect the 60’s vehicle to come out ahead.