THIS IS AN ARCHIVE OF LAKE TAHOE NEWS, WHICH WAS OPERATIONAL FROM 2009-2018. IT IS FREELY AVAILABLE FOR RESEARCH. THE WEBSITE IS NO LONGER UPDATED WITH NEW ARTICLES.

Letter: An alternative revenue source for S. Tahoe


image_pdfimage_print

Publisher’s note: This was first sent to the South Lake Tahoe City Council more than two weeks ago with no response. The author asked for it to be published on Lake Tahoe News.

Dear City Council members,

As you are well aware, the city of South Lake Tahoe urgently needs to cover an annual budget shortfall of $1,000,000 for at least the next four years. This proposal will present a brief outline of a plan for filling that shortfall without any significant environmental or otherwise negative impact on the city. Best of all, it will not require the city to spend a single dime in order to collect this additional one million dollars each year.

Instead of cutting back on services, or forcing loyal City employees to take reduced salaries, or installing parking meters or other odious projects that will only generate a fraction of the money needed and will probably upset many of your constituents, I am proposing a plan that will balance your budget – with little effort and zero additional cost on the part of the city.

Steve Kubby

Steve Kubby

Before I present my plan for putting South Lake Tahoe back in the black, you need to understand the extraordinary background and exceptional talent of those who will be involved in ensuring this program is successful. My company, KUSH, of which I am founder and CEO, features an impressive all-star Board of Directors:

• former New Mexico Gov. Gary Johnson

• former LAPD Deputy Chief Stephen Downing

• Jurist James P. Gray

• former U.S. Sen. Mike Gravel.

These men who make up our board understand federal law, state law, case law, and the conflicting legal conundrum that exists with respect to medical marijuana. Our attorney, William McPike, was recently featured on the cover of the National Law Review as one of the nation’s top marijuana lawyers. In addition, we have Dr. David Allen, a former heart surgeon, as our medical director. We also are proud to have world cannabis authority Ed Rosenthal as our director of research.

The famous inventor of the geodesic dome, Buckminster Fuller, once said, “You never change things by fighting the existing reality. To change something, build a new model that makes the existing model obsolete.”

It is in this spirit of creative cooperation and building a new model that makes existing models obsolete that our company, KUSH, was founded.

Our management team consists of high profile experts who understand the convoluted world of medical marijuana law and practice. Our uniquely qualified team of experts understand the standards used by successful dispensaries to create a medical marijuana business program that is virtually invisible within the local community. For example, under our program, we would not allow any medical marijuana dispensary to display anything other than their address on or around their facility. No signage or even names of dispensaries allowed. Patients know how to find dispensaries through online websites like WeedMaps, so there is no reason for dispensaries to publicly display anything besides the numbers of their physical address. Not only would we insist that dispensaries be invisible to the community, but under our supervision, their staff would be required to ensure that zero unauthorized consumption or sales takes place anywhere near their facility.

Speaking of staff, do we really want dispensary employees who are covered with tattoos and look like gang members, as is the case under the city’s current program? Under our program, all dispensary staff will be required to maintain a professional appearance that is appropriate to a medical facility. Likewise, the community doesn’t want to see young people hanging out at dispensary sponsored reggae parties, something which is currently allowed by the city.

Legitimate dispensary organizations understand these issues and are happy to comply.

An important part of our job is setting standards that are consistent with well run facilities, comply with state law, and carefully avoid setting off red flags with federal authorities.

The recent decision by the California Supreme Court that local cities and counties can ban dispensaries grabbed all the headlines. However, the court also officially recognized that dispensaries with over-the-counter sales are legal in California. Until now, some authorities had insisted that dispensaries are not legal, so it is important that this key issue was finally resolved by the high court.

The prospect of many jurisdictions banning dispensaries is creating a spectacular opportunity for our town, similar to what happened here in the past with the gaming industry. As you know, for decades South Lake Tahoe relied upon the nearby Stateline casinos to attract large numbers of tourists and dollars. Clearly, those days are over. The harsh reality is that Indian casinos have devastated our local economy and our town has no choice but to step up our game.

The only real question is how can a town that allows gambling and liquor 24/7, claim any moral objections to medical marijuana. Nearly nine out of 10 Americans — including 80 percent of self-identified Republicans — now say that marijuana should be legal if its use is permitted by a physician, according to nationwide Fox News telephone poll of 1,010 registered voters.

While the past experience in South Lake Tahoe with medical marijuana did not go well, it is important to remember that I specifically warned the city manager and city attorney [who are no longer employed here], in a private meeting with all three dispensary operators, that these dispensaries were not in compliance with state law or even basic standards of the medical marijuana industry. That meeting took place on April 14, 2011, at the Blue Angel Cafe. Nobody wanted to hear or discuss my concerns then, but two of these three dispensaries have since been closed down and it is clear in retrospect that they were not in compliance, just as I had warned.

Unlike the city’s current program, we would strictly limit cultivation for dispensaries to local growers and patients within the city boundaries. City residents would be able to supplement their income through a regulated and independently supervised cultivation program that benefits the entire community. Landlords would immediately benefit by this program because growers would be supervised and privately inspected on a regular basis in order to be allowed to sell their medical marijuana locally. Since most patients and growers would prefer to avoid the risks of transporting medical marijuana on the open road, they would have a strong motivation to allow our private inspectors to examine their home gardens to ensure no damage is occurring and proper health and safety procedures are being followed.

Our licensing program would not give anyone permission to violate federal law, nor can we be responsible for any federal actions against dispensaries we license. Our mission would be strictly limited to providing supervision and inspections to ensure the health and safety of these dispensaries and their products, within the boundaries of South Lake Tahoe. Such actions are entirely consistent with both state and federal law, which recognize the right of local jurisdictions to enact their own laws to protect public health and safety.

The proposed program would also go a long way toward improving the appearance of blighted areas of South Lake Tahoe.

Most professional dispensary organizations that I work with are happy to locate in the most blighted and economically depressed areas, as well as in industrial zones, since they understand that this is where they are most welcomed. Furthermore, dispensaries often invest hundreds of thousands of dollars to upgrade the exterior and interior of rundown properties as a way to gain acceptance within their local community.

We also understand that marijuana odor is a very serious issue with the community. While you can threaten irresponsible growers with fines, we will get much better results if growers know that they must meet our strict standards for cultivation and odor control, before they will be allowed to sell to any local dispensaries. Growers don’t want police or city officials visiting their gardens, but they will allow our private inspectors to verify they are in compliance.

Under the plan I am proposing, tourists and their dollars would again flock to our city for the same reason they once came here for gambling, in order to take advantage of something that is legal, but forbidden to them where they live. Now, with this decision by the California Supreme Court, more and more patients will see their local dispensaries banned and be forced to go to the Bay Area to purchase their medical marijuana. If you are a patient and are faced with fighting traffic in the Bay Area or driving up to Tahoe instead, which would you pick? Likewise, if you or your family member is a medical marijuana patient and you are planning a vacation, you are going to find it safer, easier and more enjoyable to come to South Lake Tahoe than just about anywhere else.

In addition to the enormous tax and business license revenue from a carefully regulated medical marijuana program, we will see major new revenue streams for a wide range of businesses. Our local radio, newspaper and online media could see a badly needed boost in ad revenue from dispensaries. At the same time, our licensing program could specify strict limits on dispensary advertising so that their ads conform to what one would expect for a medical facility, such as a dentist or veterinarian. Local business property owners would also receive long awaited relief in the form of new rental income, from businesses that can pay top dollar and be relied upon to pay promptly each and every month.

Let’s take a closer look at exactly how the city of South Lake Tahoe can generate a million dollars a year with a strictly regulated and taxed medical marijuana program. Let’s say we were to license eight dispensaries, like Oakland does. That amounts to $1,400,000 a year just in taxes for Oakland. In addition it provides employment for close to 100 people. Granted, Oakland is bigger than South Lake Tahoe with 390,724 residents. However, it is not unusual for our local population to swell to 250,000 during high seasons and holidays. In addition, unlike Oakland, our city is surrounded for hundreds of miles with jurisdictions that have already or will soon ban dispensaries. This city can draw upon a large surrounding area where patients have no real alternatives and a complex of eight well run dispensaries, offering a wide variety of strains and edibles, would be a powerful draw throughout the state. Hence, the notion that the city of South Lake Tahoe could generate a million dollars in taxes and licenses is actually quite realistic.

The program I am proposing is really very simple. You sign an agreement with us that gives us the exclusive power to grant special licenses to dispensaries, edible manufacturers, and related businesses. We in turn thoroughly interview and investigate all potential licensees, set strict standards of operation, oversee operations and verify all fees are current with the city. Our company would not require any money from the city. Instead, we will bill all licensees directly to cover our services. We would have the right to suspend or cancel any license and oversee the operation of all licensees, sparing the City Council headaches, wasted time and expensive lawsuits.

Let me be very clear. I cannot promise that we will raise $1,000,000 in our first year, but I can tell you that it is my sincere belief that this program can raise much more in the first year than you will ever see from parking meters or stricter traffic enforcement, or any other revenue generating program currently being considered. It is also my belief that we can raise $500,000 by year two and reach our goal of $1,000,000 by year three.

As much as you probably don’t want to think about medical marijuana, you owe it to your constituents to look at anything that will balance the budget and bring money and jobs back into the local economy. Right now, South Lake Tahoe is on its way to becoming a ghost town with a population that is in decline, employment that is in decline and business in general, except for the ski hill, that is in decline. Raising taxes isn’t an option, because it will only hasten the exodus of families, businesses and capital fleeing South Lake Tahoe. The only real and lasting solution to solving the city’s budget problems is to generate new revenue. And the only realistic new revenue stream for the City is medical marijuana. We can provide the expertise and structure to make medical marijuana a simple and practical solution for solving the current budgetary crisis.

In summary, our firm can offer the city of South Lake Tahoe the following benefits:

• Create a legal firewall between the city and the licensing and management of dispensaries.

• Generate up to $1,000,000 in revenue through taxes and fees.

• Generate up to 100 new jobs within the city.

• Boost local economy and real estate market.

• Protect local landlords by creating a private inspection program to ensure homes are not damaged by cultivation.

• Provide a powerful draw for people to come to South Lake Tahoe over other travel destinations.

• Serve as a serious source of additional income for city residents.

• Operate under regulations that would forbid outdoor advertising and strictly limit other forms of advertising.

• Restricts storefront dispensaries to blighted industrial areas, out of sight of the community and children.

• Creates a self-supporting program that won’t burden the City Council with any financial requirements or obligations.

If you are serious about fixing the gaping million dollar hole in your annual budget, I am ready to meet with you to answer your questions and to show you how we can create a program that is a win/win for all involved.

Sincerely,

Steve Kubby, South Lake Tahoe

image_pdfimage_print

About author

This article was written by admin

Comments

Comments (18)
  1. concerned says - Posted: June 1, 2013

    What a great Idea Steve, Can only hope that the Council has the brains to agree with your program. They have not shown that ability in the past.
    Good Luck.

  2. 4-mer-usmc says - Posted: June 1, 2013

    While I agree that the City of SLT is in need of new ways to generate revenues, and I have always supported diversifying our industries from tourism alone, I personally would not want the “business model” to which Mr. Kubby refers to be an industry that the City of SLT or the City Council embraces or promotes for our community. I recognize that Mr. Kubby is unhappy that the City Council did not respond to his correspondence but frequently that is the case with “Letters of Inquiry” which is all this was. A letter of inquiry is not a presentation of a business plan, and even if someone appears before the City Council and presents an unsolicited business plan there is no guarantee, and there should be no expectation that anything more than a thank you would be forthcoming to that individual standing at the podium.

  3. 30yrlocal says - Posted: June 1, 2013

    Its always nice that people offer solutions instead of complaining but our town would suffer more than it ever has should this even be contemplated. We meed a cohesive community where everyone feels safe and wants to be a contributing member. The smells of neighborhoods would force people out, the smells of marijuana from shopping areas would force other tenants out and keep consumers from other areas away. It would be an embarrassment for this town, having our visitors and locals driving down Hwy 50, seeing the marijuana leaves on storefronts.

  4. Gus says - Posted: June 1, 2013

    Interesting that he uses 24/7 gambling and drinking to justify making South Tahoe a dope center. These undesireable activities are more or less out of our control since they occur In Nevada. Anyone with teenagers has heard this argument before: “Jeeze Dad, I had a sip of wine at dinner last month, why can’t I have 20 of my buddies here for a kegger this Saturday?”

    I suppose that prostitution and heroin dens are logical next steps if we go down this road.

  5. Laketoohigh says - Posted: June 1, 2013

    When Gino started the City of Angels II collective, he sat out a box stack of cheap grow lights. When anyone inquired about them, they would be led down a path where he would tell them he would pay to set up the grow if the interested party would sell the product back to him. Grow houses sprung up all over. It was a cluster****. Homes ruined, the smell people had to explain to their kids, increased traffic in residential areas, etc. This was a case of the City Council wanting the money from the tax revenues without having to put any back for oversight or regulation. Sounds like Steve’s plan would eliminate a major portion of those worries if implemented properly.
    That being said, I do not believe turning SLT into the Amsterdam of California is the solution. One maybe two ( just so there is a choice available) collectives is all this town needs to serve the medical users. Bringing in eight dispensaries to turn this town into a “Pot Spot” of tourism will creat it’s own problems Kush would have no control over. Someday marijuana will be as legal as alcohol. Then this town would be back to the drawing board. Working hard to make this area financially stable is an excellent goal. Let’s just try to make long term plans. As I have said before, there is no reason we should not try everything we can to intice high tech firms into the area.

  6. Dogula says - Posted: June 1, 2013

    I question why, instead of working toward outright legalization, a libertarian would put so much energy into maintaining the ‘medical only’ farce that California has pursued. I’m not saying there aren’t medical uses. But 90% or more of the people who have their cards are not using it for anything but recreation, and the dispensary system is fostering a huge criminal network. The licensing of a chosen few is also anathema to libertarianism. It creates its own form of protectionism and governmental authority. I don’t believe it’s beneficial to the people in any way.

  7. observer says - Posted: June 1, 2013

    Give it up Steve-

    Your self serving multiple attempts to become a drug lord are so tenuous and on the very edge of both public opinion and the laws that it is not reasonable to propose for Tahoe, and probably, not too many other places.

    Hang in there and watch what happens in Colorado as they are also in the midst of an attempted marijuana innovation

    Additionally any program as you suggest could be obliterated at any time by any one of several governmental bodies.

    And did I really read that you think those using medical Marijuana would rather drive to Tahoe than put up with the traffic in the Bay Area???? Don’t you have to drive through Bay area traffic and Sacramento traffic to make the 400 mile round trip to Tahoe? Maybe you should look to Tracy, California as a better spot.

    Finally, it would seem that the future of South Lake Tahoe is to find a draw that encourages people to come here to live for the business environment, the life style and the mountain environment.

    It is really too bad that the majority of growth ideas for SLT just piggy back on the sleaze that sticks to our neighboring states 24/7/365 gambling and alcohol.

    How many South Lake Tahoe residents really feel like the stateline NV area is really part of our town?

  8. Old Long Skiis says - Posted: June 1, 2013

    Steve Kubby,
    On alternate source of revenue for SLT, I’ll say good and bad. On the plus side at least your offering up an idea. I’v’e tried with suggestions but was met with mostly silence. A few people agreed with me that we need to collect TOT fees owed to the city. I asked for other ideas from readers here but all I heard was crickets in the distance.
    I also like your idea of inspecting grow houses and dispensries. Maybe the interiors of the foreclosed houses in my neighborhood wouldn’t be covered in mold or in the case of the one behind me, catching on fire leaving a burned out shell. They messed with the wiring to get more juice to the grow lights. Now that house sits abandoned and boarded up. Vent fans and charred debris scattered about the yard. Owner won’t clean it up or rebuild so there it sits. Thanks growers for leaving your mess behind!
    Steve, I have nothing against old Fred and Ethyl Mertz growing a few plants to help deal with their glaucoma but turning dispensaries and grow houses into a source of revenue for SLT is wrong on many levels. Theres the criminal element, gang activity, federal law superceding state law, driving while high…. is this what Tahoe should be known for??? Pot in the pines? marijuana in the meadows, tokin’on the trails?
    I thought way back in 1967 that pot would be legal long before now. While the legalization effort has had some succsess, youv’e got a good committee formed and naybe with a little luck you’ll get part of what your looking for. I wouldn’t hold my breath though… Okay…for you? Hold in the smoke as long as you can…now exhale. Feel better now?
    Take care, Old Long Skiis

  9. Lisa says - Posted: June 1, 2013

    I could have sworn I read a letter some months back the Steve had had it with the community and was leaving. Awwwwww it was so quiet and nice for a moment. OBSERVER I completely agree with you. I thought everyone had made it clear that we aren’t interested in Tahoe becoming a pot Mecca. It’s been wonderful since the despenseries have be gone. The city tried it and it failed. Lets move on to raising money on other things, beside weed, that attract people to come here. We have many things to offer that are unique just to Tahoe.

  10. A.B. says - Posted: June 1, 2013

    Steve, I have always admired you, and you’re a great guy to ski with.

    As a conservative, I have always supported legalization of marijuana, and I don’t use it at all.

    But you need to remember the motto of the government; if it moves, tax it; if it keeps moving, regulate it; if it stops moving, subsidize it.

    If the government ran the Sahara Desert, we’d have a shortage of sand.

    Involving government in anything is the kiss of death. As far as I am concerned, take this matter to Brian Sandoval’s office. He’d run with it. It’s perfect for Nevada. City of South Lake Tahoe? They have a knack for ruining business. They’re their own worst enemy.

  11. DougM says - Posted: June 1, 2013

    I think this post and discussion illustrates more clearly than ever what a sham the concept of “medical marijuana” is. All these “experts” orchestrating the ins and outs of complying with the law. But to what end? So that a huge business can be developed distributing weed to a market that is to be maximized, as all good businesses do. Doesn’t exactly sound like only cancer patients needing pain relief to me.

    Folks, SLT is largely in the straights that it is due to a terrible image problem that distinguishes it from other lake shore communities. We have gambling, we have gangs, we have this seedy “element” that drives tourists and vacation home buyers elsewhere. The last thing we need is for SLT to also be known as the dope capital of the Lake.

  12. Squawllywood says - Posted: June 1, 2013

    Doug, as a south shore property owner, I reside in North Lake. Why?

    Because of exactly what you cite in your post above. South Tahoe has an element that drives those with means to the north, west & east shores.

    Until the City of South Lake Tahoe decides to clean up it’s act and quit squandering the taxpayer’s money, NOTHING will ever change.

    The City of South Tahoe does NOT have a revenue problem, they have a spending problem.

  13. Parker says - Posted: June 1, 2013

    I like to think that I’m usually able to add to the discussion here on LTN. But observer, Lisa, A.B., Doug M, and especially Squallywood, you’ve all said it quite well!!

  14. Steve Kubby says - Posted: June 1, 2013

    Thanks to all who took the time to give their feedback. Special thanks to A.B., who I thought gave me some especially valuable advice.

  15. TeaTotal says - Posted: June 2, 2013

    AB. says- You state: “As a conservative, I have always supported legalization of marijuana…”. If you believe that the conservatives support that you’re high. The conservatives have fought every single sane marijuana reform issue and supported draconian prison sentences for mere possession for decades. Just more delusional disconnect with the world of facts.

  16. nature bats last says - Posted: June 2, 2013

    Im sick of smelling the skunk all day and night in my neighborhood and trying to explain it to my 10 year old son who has never seen a skunk in the neighborhood. Those illegal growers and their guns and questionable visitors need to get kicked out of the neighborhoods and out of town for that matter. The cops know who you are!!!

  17. Steve Kubby says - Posted: June 3, 2013

    UNHAPPY ABOUT THE SMELL OF MARIJUANA IN YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD? That was the biggest complaint people had about my proposal, even though that is one of the key issues we addressed. Unfortunately, most growers have no idea their garden is emitting odors, since they have adapted to the smell and can no longer detect it. My suggestion is to leave a polite note on your neighbor’s door, asking them to install a deodorizing filter, available at most hydroponic stores. Most growers would freak out upon receiving such a note and have the odor cleaned up by the next day. There is no excuse for stinking up a neighborhood with the skunky smell of weed (as much as some of us enjoy that smell) and I urge anyone growing cannabis to make sure they are not contributing to this problem.

  18. nature bats last says - Posted: June 4, 2013

    Im guessing they cant smell it because they are too stoned to even realize its a problem. I wouldnt ever want to interact with these people as they have mean dogs that are staked out in their front yards blocking access to their front doors with big fences around their houses and green house. Their dogs are vicious and attack people at the fence whenever they go by. There is a little ol 92 year old man that walks the neighborhood that is constantly attacked at the fence by these mean dogs. Im surprised he hasnt had a heart attack. These pot growers have no interest in decorum or making a choice that is good for the neighborhood. They are probably too cheep to buy any kind of filter to make the smell go away. Im jsut waiting for the day there is a bust, and I hope its soon