THIS IS AN ARCHIVE OF LAKE TAHOE NEWS, WHICH WAS OPERATIONAL FROM 2009-2018. IT IS FREELY AVAILABLE FOR RESEARCH. THE WEBSITE IS NO LONGER UPDATED WITH NEW ARTICLES.

Opinion: Freedoms are eroding in the United States


image_pdfimage_print

Publisher’s note: Rep. Tom McClintock, R-Granite Bay, on June 27 delivered the following remarks on the House floor.

Mr. Speaker:

Three major developments have occurred within the last six weeks that are each disturbing by themselves, but extremely alarming when viewed together.

The first was the revelation that for more than two years, one of the most powerful and feared agencies of the federal government was used to harass and intimidate individual Americans based upon their political beliefs.

Tom McClintock

Tom McClintock

Evidence has already established that hundreds of conservative groups were subjected to invasive interrogations when they sought to participate in the political process. This pattern of conduct was not limited to applications under section 501(c), but included audits of established conservative groups and individuals as well. This conduct reached the highest levels of the IRS. A similar pattern of abuse has been demonstrated in several other agencies including the Department of Labor and the Environmental Protection Agency.

These facts are undisputed and their implications are utterly toxic to a free society.

The second development was news that the Justice Department had surreptitiously seized the telephone records of some 20 reporters covering Congress for the Associated Press in an obvious attempt to discourage whistleblowers from talking to the press.

Fox News reporter James Rosen and his family were stalked by authorities as he tried to get to the bottom of the Benghazi scandal. To obtain the search warrant to allow this, the Attorney General of the United States filed an absolutely spurious claim with the federal court charging that Rosen had conspired to violate the Espionage Act – the same act under which the Julius and Ethel Rosenberg were executed in 1953.

The message to reporters asking inconvenient questions of the administration could not possibly have been more powerful or terrifying. And this week, the head of AP reported that their news sources have dried up in response to these naked acts of intimidation.

The third development is that the federal government has swept up the phone and internet records of millions of Americans in the name of state security.

The practice of the government searching your personal records without having first established reason to believe you have committed a crime is expressly forbidden by the Fourth Amendment –which was adopted in direct response to British officials indiscriminately searching homes and records for evidence of contraband.

Yet this government has done precisely that on a scale unimaginable in colonial times searching for evidence of terrorism.

If I know what websites you’ve visited and what phone numbers you’ve called – I know a very great deal about your political and religious beliefs, your personal relationships, your sexual interests, your mental and physical health, your family finances.

And with that information in the hands of officials who have already demonstrated a clear willingness and ability to use their power to intimidate political adversaries into silence and to discourage reporters from asking embarrassing questions, our society could very quickly cross a very bright line between freedom and authoritarianism.

As if to underscore the point, the administration’s spokesman recently told a national television audience that quote — “the law is irrelevant.” He called these matters “a distraction.” What does that say about a society that once prided itself on being a nation of laws and not of men?

All around us in this Capitol are the trappings of the Roman Republic. They serve as an inspiration – but also as a warning.

The Roman Republic didn’t end because Caesar crossed the Rubicon with his legion. It ended because that illegal act was not effectively resisted and led to another usurpation and then another and then another over a period of years. It was the accumulation of many such infringements that brought the inexorable decline of freedom and set the stage for Rome’s age of tyrants.

That is what Jefferson meant when he said the price of liberty is eternal vigilance. My great fear, as we adjourn tomorrow to celebrate the 237th anniversary of American freedom, is that sometime between the barbecues and the fireworks we shrug off these profound developments and go about as if nothing has happened.

This summer of 2013 has brought us to a crossroads, and I rise today to urge the House to give these events its full and undivided attention. All the facts surrounding these matters must be fully laid out, those responsible held fully accountable, and the rule of law – and especially of our Constitution — fully restored.

image_pdfimage_print

About author

This article was written by admin

Comments

Comments (16)
  1. copper says - Posted: June 27, 2013

    So congressman, your defense of human rights against government intrusion into our lives is admirable, if not necessarily “right on.”

    But, as a Republican (in the interest of full disclosure, a party I haven’t trusted in a lot of years), how do you feel about government intrusion into women’s reproductive rights, voting rights in the traditionally bigoted areas of our country, limiting the ability of the richest minorities, your Republican sponsors, to buy congressmen, probably including you, with their unlimited access to purchasing candidates in our elections, and with the ownership by most Republican leaders of the political crazies who have become an infection in our citizen based system of government?

    Underscore anything you want – you’re part of the infection that’s destroying our political process.

  2. Gus says - Posted: June 27, 2013

    Congressman, your comments are right on the mark and much appreciated in these dark days. To quote Ben Franklin: “They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.” Do not let BHO and his Chicago thugs take all of our essential liberties.

    Okay all you “progressives” out there…feel free to attack me because of my thoughts and beliefs, it’s what you do best!

  3. Frank Riley says - Posted: June 28, 2013

    McClintock gives good reasons why we should not re-elect him. Too much of a GOP parrot.

  4. Know Bears says - Posted: June 28, 2013

    I’m a progressive, and I agree with almost all of the above.

    The reference to “BHO and his Chicago thugs” seems extreme, but I can’t argue with any of the rest.

    We must fight for civil liberties — ALL civil liberties for EVERYONE. (Um, that includes gay people — even those who wish to marry.)

  5. Lisa says - Posted: June 28, 2013

    He Says about the IRS “scandal”, “These facts are undisputed”. Well unfortunately for him, those aren;t the facts. Now it turns out they asked for more info from both Conservative AND Liberal groups in an attempt to be more effecient (aren’t people always demanding more effeciency) and the COnservative groups were actually moved through the process faster than they would have been in the past. Why didn’t we know this from the beginning. Because ISSA forced them to take the info out of the reprt when it was opened to the public. THAT is what should scare us.

  6. Lisa says - Posted: June 28, 2013

    So McClintock says about the IRS “scandal” that “These facts are undisputed”. Unfortunately those aren’t the facts. The IRS asked for more info from BOTH Conservative AND Liberal groups and the COnservative groups were actually moved through the system faster than they would have before this process was created. Why didn’t we know this whenthe report was originally issued. Because Darryl Issa made them take OUT the information showing it was uniform on both sides before releasing the report. THAT is what should scare the pants off us.

  7. cosa pescado says - Posted: June 28, 2013

    He voted for the Patriot Act twice. Which he regrets. Claims to be against SOPA. Maybe there is a change going on.
    I’d like to see him taking some action as penance for the previous votes.

  8. Judy Higgins says - Posted: June 28, 2013

    the sooner we vote McC out of office, we’ll then be able to get some balance

  9. nature bats last says - Posted: June 28, 2013

    tom mcclintock is such a jack — I would never ever believe a word he says or feel so paranoid as he wants us to feel. If it were his buddy GW Bush doing these investigations and the democrats were complaining he would come off with some needed justification and act like the liberals were all criminals that needed to be investigated. What a big ol whiner tom is.

  10. observer says - Posted: June 28, 2013

    Well, Nature Bats Last-

    it is a fact that the telephone and internet information mining did indeed begin under the last Bush administration. Mclintock thinks anything a republican does is ok, even it it is what he is currently railing against. He doesn’t listen to his own speeches, or only talks to.for others like him. Why are these guys elected? Voters are so dumb, in many cases voting against their own interests.

  11. LilPeter says - Posted: June 28, 2013

    TeaBagTom knows that if he panders to his intellectually challenged base voters and keeps the support of his “rancher” friends, he can continue on his life as a career sellout to the highest bidder. What a class A, #1 jackhole this guy is.

  12. Dogula says - Posted: June 28, 2013

    Lisa, here are actual numbers that dispute your claim that ‘progressive’ groups were subjected to the same scrutiny that conservative groups were.
    “According to (Inspector Genersl) George, six of the 20 progressive groups that applied for tax-exemption between 2010 and 2012 received close scrutiny. Of the 292 tea-party groups that applied, … all 292 did.”
    The article was in an online publication called HotAir, yesterday, if you want to check it out yourself. And as the article points out, the real issue isn’t just WHO was being targeted. It’s that the IRS has the power to do any of this at all. It should scare you, regardless of which political view you take.

  13. Scott Blumenthal says - Posted: June 29, 2013

    Thank you, Tom!

  14. Rick says - Posted: June 29, 2013

    Sorry Dogula:

    A fair reading of the record is that:

    1) there is no scandal – you may not like the screening criteria but we bit– at gov agencies that treat small problems the same as big, so when they find an effective solution to triage their workload, we cry scandal; and
    2) the White House was not at all involved or even close to these decisions. Something the Republicans and especially Issa simply lied about; they have selectively released information – they lied.

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/06/24/irs-progressive-groups_n_3492679.html

    Enjoy,

    Rick

  15. Whip says - Posted: July 1, 2013

    There is no wrong doing on the part of the Obama administration on any of the recent conspiracy theories floated by the republican party.
    They love to stir up the fear to keep their less than informed base in line. Fortunately for tom the west slope of our county is full of tea baggers.

  16. Gus says - Posted: July 3, 2013

    Rick: The Huffington Post is the mouthpiece rag for the “progressives” in Washington, just as Fox News is the chief apologist for the Republican Party. Trust neither of these “news” organizations if you value truth and honesty.