THIS IS AN ARCHIVE OF LAKE TAHOE NEWS, WHICH WAS OPERATIONAL FROM 2009-2018. IT IS FREELY AVAILABLE FOR RESEARCH. THE WEBSITE IS NO LONGER UPDATED WITH NEW ARTICLES.

President releases sweeping global warming plan


image_pdfimage_print

By Paul Rogers, San Jose Mercury News

In the most sweeping action the federal government has taken to date to combat the warming of the planet, President Obama on Tuesday announced the nation’s first mandatory restrictions on greenhouse gas emissions from new and existing power plants.

The new rules, a centerpiece environmental initiative of Obama’s presidency, follow the lead that California set last year when it began to impose statewide greenhouse gas limits on power plants, factories and other industrial sources.

Speaking at Georgetown University, Obama took a swipe at climate deniers and described global warming as a major threat to the nation’s economy, farm production and its environment, noting that severe storms, droughts and forest

“We limit the amount of toxic chemicals like mercury and arsenic and sulfur in our air and water,” Obama said. “But power plants can still dump unlimited amounts of carbon pollution into our air for free. That’s not right. That’s not safe. And it needs to stop.”

The announcement sets up years of legal and political battles, with environmentalists and the administration on one side and the coal and utility industry, along with most Republicans in Congress, on the other. Opponents contend that the rules will cost too much and drag down the economy.

Experts said Tuesday that the president’s new climate strategy — which does not require approval from Congress — is expected to boost Silicon Valley companies involved in solar, wind, energy efficiency and other cleantech businesses, while also spurring more construction of large solar and wind projects in the Southern California desert.

“This is important for our environment and for the Silicon Valley companies that have made this the cleantech hub of the world,” said Carl Guardino, CEO of the Silicon Valley Leadership Group. “Companies like SunPower, SolarCity and Tesla Motors are leading the way in developing the innovative technologies and financing we need to meet the goals of deploying more renewable power, advancing energy efficiency and delivering on the promise of next-generation transportation.”

Obama’s new strategy on climate change also included broad new initiatives to increase renewable energy construction on federal land, tighten rules for appliance efficiency and begin planning for coastal cities and other areas to deal with the effects of the warming climate.

“This is exactly the way environmental policy moves forward in this country,” said Mary Nichols, who chairs the California Air Resources Board. “California starts out and takes a leadership post, then other states join in and the federal government comes in, and eventually we get a nationwide program. I think it’s great.”

Power plants — mostly from the burning of coal and natural gas to generate electricity — produce 33 percent of the nation’s greenhouse gases, the largest source. By comparison, all cars, trucks, planes, trains and boats account for 28 percent.

Obama is able to crack down on the dirtiest power plants through executive action.

In 2007, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the federal Environmental Protection Agency can regulate carbon dioxide, the primary gas that traps heat in Earth’s atmosphere, under the Clean Air Act — the same as it does with soot, lead and other types of air pollution.

“This is the change Americans have been waiting for on climate,” said Michael Brune, national executive director of the Sierra Club, based in San Francisco. “President Obama is finally putting action behind his words.”

Coal industry and utility groups are expected to try to block the rules through lawsuits. The new regulations, scheduled to be released next summer by the EPA, will make coal-fired power plants — which emit more greenhouse gases than other types of power plants — more expensive to build and operate.

“The last thing our economy needs right now is another layer of government red tape that will make it harder to grow businesses and hire more workers,” said House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio.

Obama’s new climate plan also directs the Interior Department to approve enough renewable energy projects, such as solar and wind, on public lands by 2020 to power 6 million homes. Millions of acres of California desert are federally owned by the Bureau of Land Management. In addition, it makes up to $8 billion in loan guarantees available for energy efficiency projects and advanced fossil fuel technology.

It also expands energy efficiency standards for federal buildings and home appliances, an area where California has led since the 1970s. And the plan commits to developing new gas-mileage standards for heavy-duty trucks on 2018 models and later.

Nichols said she doesn’t anticipate the new rules on power plants will upend California’s carbon-trading market or result in higher utility bills for California consumers. She noted the state already has a law requiring mandatory carbon limits from power plants and that California law requires that 33 percent of the state’s electricity come from renewable sources by 2020.

California uses very little coal-fired electricity because coal is not mined in the state and because power plants run on natural gas, which burns more cleanly, and have fit better with the state’s strict smog regulations. California’s electricity mostly comes from natural gas, hydroelectric power, nuclear energy and renewables.

Globally, the 10 hottest years on record have all occurred since 1998. Sea level rose 7 inches in the 20th century. Ice sheets in Greenland, Antarctica and the Arctic sea are all shrinking in size, as are most of the world’s glaciers.

“We don’t have time for a meeting of the Flat Earth Society,” Obama said. “Sticking your head in the sand might make you feel safer, but it is not going to protect you from the coming storm.”

image_pdfimage_print

About author

This article was written by admin

Comments

Comments (18)
  1. Dogula says - Posted: June 27, 2013

    Yeah, that’s great, mr. obama. Distract, and deflect from the REAL problems this country faces. Classic.
    We have met and exceeded the standards (in THIS country, at least) of the Kyoto protocols, but you demand more. How ’bout we deal with the REAL issues that will cripple our children in the coming years? Economic disaster, WWIII starting in the middle east, our own country tyranizing its citizens with the NSA, the IRS, and EPA?
    Whenever obama has real issues to deal with, he starts up on some bogus issue that does not need to be addressed. Kind of like Clinton’s old ‘bimbo eruptions’.

  2. Atomic says - Posted: June 27, 2013

    Dogula, congrats on winning the job, lead mouthpiece for the Flat Earth Society.

    Is that your first official statement?

  3. Marlene in Tahoe says - Posted: June 27, 2013

    The occupant of the white house continues wearing His only crown a crumple ‘tin foil hat’ of the geo-political scamming crowd.
    There has not been any “warming” (what an interpretation) for over a decade.
    This has been the tool of the UN/Gore tyranny bunch. They thought they could TAX to WORLD!! Partially because 1/3 of the world is illiterate and used to living under tyranny. The other 1/3 likes to believe they are the elitist class living above the rabble.
    Yes, ANYTHING to distract from reality, HIS and HOLDERS Fast and Furious, Benghazi, IRS, NSA spying, Arms to terrorists, no transparency, Gitmo still open, Exorbitant costs of vacations billed to taxpayers while sequestering, and on and on and on and on ……
    This empty suit has torn this country apart and exposed all it’s flaws, done absolutly nothing to better it or the people that pay his salary and his wife’s excessive new lifestyle. Expose this fraud!!

  4. Atomic says - Posted: June 27, 2013

    That didn’t take long…..a new member. Marlene you can be the new Flat Earth Fact checker, you’re obviously so good at it-

  5. Dogula says - Posted: June 27, 2013

    Personal attacks are the last resort of the loser in the arguement.

  6. Parker says - Posted: June 27, 2013

    Exactly Dogula!!

  7. Bijou Bill says - Posted: June 27, 2013

    Not only is the Earth flat, it’s unique! Unlike every other piece of our known galaxy, it’s only a few thousand years old!
    Is that a personal attack on someone’s profound ignorance?

  8. cosa pescado says - Posted: June 27, 2013

    I also see another denier has demonstrated that they don’t know how to define climate.

    “Personal attacks are the last resort of the loser in the arguement.”

    What about people who try to narrow the conversation because they don’t even have an argument?

  9. A.B. says - Posted: June 27, 2013

    Our illustrious leader is on a $100,000,000 vacation to Africa right now, courtesy of the U.S. taxpayer.

    Any chance that they’ll keep him?

  10. Atomic says - Posted: June 27, 2013

    Dogula, I wouldn’t call any of this jibberish an ‘argument’, more just random venting from some mysterious frustration source that only you can identify. And you should identify it, more healthy that way!

    The planet is changing and we are a large part of the change.

    Get over it.

    No debate, science deniers will be dismissed, they just don’t deserve any more time on the clock. I’m only trying to have some fun with you guys, you are always so mad about something!

    I’m sure you are all nice folks. You just happen to be profoundly wrong on these important topics.

  11. Parker says - Posted: June 27, 2013

    See Dogula, you’re not supposed to question certain things!! You just can’t! If you exercise freedom of speech, you deserve to be personally attacked! You even get words put into your mouth!

    I guess people shouldn’t have questioned the prediction of another Ice Age coming that scientists made in the 70’s?

    But statements like, the climate is changing and we’re a large part of the change, while debatable, is healthy! The climate on Earth has, and is, always evolving!

    And I actually, genuinely credit the Pres. for putting forth a plan! Just if the basis of all this is control the output of carbon into the Earth’s atmosphere, what can the U.S. do to make sure/enforce that the rest of the World goes along with any plan?

  12. Atomic says - Posted: June 27, 2013

    Scientists are no longer debating it, it’s not a mystery anymore guys . The only people debating it are Faux News talking heads and psycho babble corporate foot soldiers. Kind of disappointing that so many people are so easily dissuaded from plain science.

    Like, what exactly would the conspiracy be?

    So the scientists say: Lets make up climate change so we could all……well,….get rich….uhhhh…..being scientists! Yeah, great idea.

    Science = good if it fits my opinions, outlooks and political beliefs

    Science = bad if it makes me uncomfortable or if it is supported by people I don’t like

  13. cosa pescado says - Posted: June 27, 2013

    Parker.
    How many ‘weathers’ make a climate?
    Also, tell us what a null hypothesis is, and how that is relevant to your post.

  14. Parker says - Posted: June 28, 2013

    Congrats on your new blogging name, Cosa. And I’ll try to explain this to you one last time, so hopefully you’ll FINALLY get it?!

    You could ask me what 2+2 equals, and I’m not going to jump because sone anonymous person is trying to make me. If I didn’t know something, if the 20 units of science classes I was required to take to graduate from Berkeley didn’t cover something, and I wanted to buy into one’s attempt to play some game, and change the subject, gee in the world of the Internet, any answer is easy to find.

    But I still can never get an answer, and I love how people try to change the subject, to: what’s the plan that those people, who are so sure of the Carbon Causing/Climate Change/Global Warming issue, to see and insure every nation on Earth goes along with any program?

    Pres. Obama made a proposal. Okay, good! Are we invading China & Russia to make sure they go along with it?

  15. cosa pescado says - Posted: June 28, 2013

    Just checking to make sure you know how to define the most basic concepts.
    It’s actually really important. And most people who talk about climate can’t define climate using any unit of time.
    So what is that number and unit of time? Last I checked you thought it was about 3 months.

    It’s not a new name. Just different language.

  16. tesseracked says - Posted: June 28, 2013

    let’s all get together and unravel the chem trail thing…

  17. LilPeter says - Posted: June 28, 2013

    If you don’t know that the chemtrail conspiracy theory is nonsense, try pulling your head out of your Alex Jones, it will help you rejoin the reality community.

  18. tesseracked says - Posted: June 28, 2013

    i rest my case.