Looking to curtail U.S. police militarization
By Radley Balko, Huffington Post
When the FBI finally located Whitey Bulger in 2010 after searching for 16 years, the reputed mobster was suspected of involvement in 19 murders in the 1970s and ’80s, and was thought to be armed with a massive arsenal of weapons. He was also 81 at the time, in poor physical health, and looking at spending the rest of his life in prison. Of all the people who might meet the criteria for arrest by a SWAT team, one might think that Bulger would top the list.
Yet instead of sending in a tactical team to tear down Bulger’s door in the middle of the night, the FBI took a different appraoch. After some investigating, FBI officials cut the lock on a storage locker Bulger used in the apartment complex where he was staying. They then had the property manager call Bulger to tell him someone may have broken into his locker. When Bulger went to investigate, he was arrested without incident. There was no battering ram, there were no flash grenades, there was no midnight assault on his home.
That peaceful apprehension of a known violent fugitive, found guilty this week of participating in 11 murders and a raft of other crimes, stands in stark contrast to the way tens of thousands of Americans are confronted each year by SWAT teams battering down their doors to serve warrants for nonviolent crimes, mostly involving drugs.
On the night of Jan. 5, 2011, for example, police in Framingham, Mass., raided a Fountain Street apartment that was home to Eurie Stamps and his wife, Norma Bushfan-Stamps. An undercover officer had allegedly purchased drugs from Norma’s 20-year-old son, Joseph Bushfan, and another man, Dwayne Barrett, earlier that evening, and now the police wanted to arrest them. They took a battering ram to the door, set off a flash grenade, and forced their way inside.
As the SWAT team moved through the apartment, screaming at everyone to get on the floor, Officer Paul Duncan approached Eurie Stamps. The 68-year-old, not suspected of any crime, was watching a basketball game in his pajamas when the police came in.
By the time Duncan got to him in a hallway, Stamps was face-down on the floor with his arms over his head, as police had instructed him. As Duncan moved to pull Stamps’ arms behind him, he says he fell backwards, somehow causing his gun to discharge, shooting Stamps. The grandfather of 12 was killed in his own home, while complying with police orders during a raid for crimes in which he had no involvement.
The Obama administration has begun talking about reforming the criminal justice system, notably this week, when Attorney General Eric Holder announced changes to how federal prosecutors will consider mandatory minimum sentences. If government leaders are looking for another issue to tackle, they might consider the astonishing evolution of America’s police forces over the last 30 years.
Today in America, SWAT teams are deployed about 100 to 150 times per day, or about 50,000 times per year — a dramatic increase from the 3,000 or so annual deployments in the early 1980s, or the few hundred in the 1970s. The vast majority of today’s deployments are to serve search warrants for drug crimes. But the use of SWAT tactics to enforce regulatory law also appears to be rising. This month, for example, a SWAT team raided the Garden of Eden, a sustainable growth farm in Arlington, Texas, supposedly to look for marijuana. The police found no pot, however, and the real intent of the raid appears to have been for code enforcement, as the officers came armed with an inspection notice for nuisance abatement.
Used to be police were problem mitigators. Now they are “in your face” confrontational. Very little connection with the community. They are, in fact, scary.
I concur with sailor1 – the police, the DA and the courts are all very scary and they are not there to protect you. In fact, the US Supreme Court says police have no duty to protect, but they must provide equal protection. Anyway, the biggest gang in town is the police.
Sailor,yea when did police change from officers of the PEACE to officers of the LAW. Big difference in mentality. I can’t imagine the stresses they are placed under, its not something for everyone to do. Imagine the stress they are put under and they still have to follow the law, its just their job, just following orders.
yea and Firebreaker, that was petrifying to me when I learned that police are under absolutely no duty to protect your life at all, unless it is in a very specific personal relationship is made.
Was a story just this week on a swat raid of a commune in California…..they thought tomato plants were pot…..
One f….d up country
The Article is spot on. Everyone I know is talking about it.
The entire mentality within the law enforcement community has changed to an Us against them, Zero tolerance Military operation. they are waging a Shock and awe war on American Citizens.
who thinks every officer within eyesight needs to Empty his gun into a suspect?
The stories are too numerous to mention.
shame, we need police, and some are really decent people brave people.
but the majority are now part of a militaristic, Don’t mess with us fraternity that is bad for everyone.
“Everyone I know is talking about it.”
That’s your problem right there.
Has it occurred to anyone that one of the issues might be that local police departments can no longer afford to attract educated and experienced folks who have not only good judgment but also compassion when dealing with citizens? How many folks here believe that their cops are merely security guards who found a better paying gig?
As my pseudonym might suggest, I spent a decade or three in law enforcement and I guarantee that most agencies once gave priority to hiring folks who could be both assertive and compassionate, and understood that they served the citizens by both trying to remove the dangerous and the criminal minded, but also by trying to help solve the problems of the endangered and the helpless.
All that being the case, what does that say about the folks on-line here and elsewhere who believe that their representatives should hire law enforcement employees at the same minimum wage and benefits that a grocery store might pay its parking enforcement folks or its shoplifter chasers?
I should add one more thing to my comment: I’m a lifelong Democrat, and a strong supporter of President Obama, but I think that Eric Holder has been a terrible Attorney General, pretty much endorsing anything the attack tigers of the U.S. Attorney’s office want to do with minimal attention to doing what’s “right,” which would catch the attention of almost any responsible local District Attorneys’ office. A manager is supposed to “manage,” not simply lead the charge.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Equc9A1pqQk
I’m much more worried about being harrassed by the CHP around here than the SWAT Team.
Copper, you are out to lunch …and BijouBill you don’t have a clue…
Hey this was all predicted people !
You “slave mentality” democrats are at the foundation of the nations problems.
I remember when I lived in Tahoe, you couldn’t drive to the store without seeing some type of cop… The democrats brought this on, remember that!
You think the police state is bad now… wait till you see the efforts to bail out the bankrupted liberal governments like California and NYC and Chicago..
It is surprising how few people seem concerned with this issue of how our government is turning us into a police state. America is now a country where the government has in effect created a slave state of private sector workers.
A country where the government employees can retire young and live on fat retirement plans not even legal for non-government employers to provide.
You think the police state is bad now… what till you see the Federal government start bailing out the liberal centers like NYC and California and Chicago…