THIS IS AN ARCHIVE OF LAKE TAHOE NEWS, WHICH WAS OPERATIONAL FROM 2009-2018. IT IS FREELY AVAILABLE FOR RESEARCH. THE WEBSITE IS NO LONGER UPDATED WITH NEW ARTICLES.

LTCC board contemplates 2014 bond measure


image_pdfimage_print

By Kathryn Reed

The bulk of the buildings on the 164-acre campus of Lake Tahoe Community College have been funded by the state of California. But that might change next year.

For more than a year college board members have been discussing the possibility of asking local voters to pass a general obligation bond that would help create new facilities. John Palmer with Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe law firm discussed the legal implications, process and options with the board on Sept. 24.

At the Oct. 8 meeting the board will likely vote on a reimbursement resolution. This would not obligate the college to go forward with the bond, but it’s the next step in the process.

LTCC President Kindred Murillo, from left, talks as board members Karen Borges and Roberta Mason listen. Photo/Kathryn Reed

LTCC President Kindred Murillo, from left, talks about a possible bond as board members Karen Borges and Roberta Mason listen. Photo/Kathryn Reed

LTCC is one of eight college districts in the state to have never gone to voters with a general obligation bond.

The college is looking at possibly asking voters in November 2014 to approve a bond of probably no more than $38 million that would be paid back in 25 years.

The college has a list of $43 million worth of improvements, but doesn’t believe the higher amount is something the voters would stomach.

Another concern is the other tax measures that could be on that ballot. South Lake Tahoe is contemplating a snow removal tax hike and the local library is expected to ask voters to renew that tax.

When local voters went to the ballot in spring 1974 they agreed to tax themselves 72 cents on every $100,000 of assessed property value. (This was pre-Proposition 13.) Voters were asked to create the college district, approve the tax that would buy the land, and select the board members. (Roberta Mason and Fritz Wenck were on the original board and are still board members.)

Hazel Hoak, who was El Dorado County’s assistant superintendent of schools, became the interim president until the board that September hired Jim Duke to be the college’s first full-time president. (Hoak will be at the college’s 40th anniversary celebration in June.)

Classes started in fall 1975 at a motel on Highway 50. In 1988, the first building opened on the campus people know today. It is state dollars that have funded most every building on campus. There was a local capital campaign for the Haldan Art Gallery and library. The debt on that is paid for from money the college receives through redevelopment money and rent from the U.S. Forest Service.

And it is state money that would help LTCC achieve what it wants for the next decade. Kindred Murillo, college president, said the goal is to double what taxpayers approve through matching dollars from the state.

Today when the state gives money for facilities it expects the college to come up with half of the funds for the project.

LTCC is going forward with plans to make improvements. It has made the short list with the state for a remodel for efficiency grant. The bond money would provide the needed matching funds. The plan is to modernize the science lab, upgrade technology on campus and make energy upgrades.

LEED certified buildings were brought up at last week’s visioning session, which points to the community already wanting the college to be a leader in energy efficiency.

The college has also asked the state for money to build a public safety training facility. This would go close to where the U.S. Forest Service offices are. The college is also talking to city officials about this project because it could include a fire station. (The city has long wanted to update the outdated station across from South Tahoe Middle School.) It’s also possible the college site could be a command center in the event of a major emergency like the Angora Fire.

Murillo would like part of the safety piece to also include another exit point in case of an emergency. This might be via South Tahoe Public Utility District. Putting in automatic door locks and being able to communicate with every classroom in the event of an emergency are other foreseeable improvements. So are cameras in the parking lot.

Other facilities the college would like to construct include residential housing for students. A public-private partnership is possible.

An environmental science building could have multiple uses – including being a university center for a four-year program.

Another upgrade would be the possibility of creating an early childhood development center that could incorporate the Child Development Center on campus with Tahoe Parents Nursery School.

While a decision has not been made, the bond counsel on Tuesday touted the option of going the route where only 55 percent of the voters need to say yes. More requirements come with that type of bond compared to the usual two-thirds needed for a tax measure, but it can also be easier to pass.

image_pdfimage_print

About author

This article was written by admin

Comments

Comments (14)
  1. Perry R. Obray says - Posted: September 25, 2013

    “An environmental science building could have multiple uses – including being a university center for a four-year program.”
    Very thought provoking.

  2. suspiciousmind says - Posted: September 25, 2013

    Great more taxes. I can wait. This is proof you can get blood from a turnip or at least some self-serving people think so.

  3. tahoe Pizza Eater says - Posted: September 25, 2013

    Raise tuition. That’s what they should do. Better yet, let the students vote. The students can vote “No”, and leave things the way they are. Or the students can vote “Yes” to raise tuition, and get more. Leave the tax payers out of it, and let the students decide.

  4. Arod says - Posted: September 25, 2013

    At first read of the title I thought, raise taxes in this environment? But the proposed improvements are necessary, especially the science wing. We must invest in our youth. The rest of the world is leaving us in the dust. Tuition has doubled over the last few years and we should not burden students with increased student debt. The true measure of a society is how it cares for it’s most vulnerable. How do you think we are doing?

  5. tahoe Pizza Eater says - Posted: September 25, 2013

    I’m not convinced. A community college is a place for students whom would like to go to a four year college, but are not quite ready. Some students go to a community college to get a modest education that can help them get a better job. Either way, a community college is not intended to provide a four year degree and place students into high paying careers. That job is for our universities.

  6. dan Wilvers says - Posted: September 25, 2013

    I think the telling sign is that what once was funded by the state no longer is.

    In a super majority where passage would be a breeze, why do we no longer have the funds from our state monies to improve educational opportunities as we once did, even where a super majority didn’t exist?

    The answer to that question will take care of all the debate.

  7. Biggerpicture says - Posted: September 25, 2013

    Pizza Eater, many go to a community college to take prerequisite class’s that are much more expensive at a four year college. ‘

  8. sunriser2 says - Posted: September 25, 2013

    How come they can’t share the new high school facilities at night?

    That’s how it was done in the past. Along with a couple of rooms at the middle school.

  9. Digger says - Posted: September 25, 2013

    I vote no on this one. I have been totally milked dry with school taxes and I just will not pay anymore.

  10. tahoe Pizza Eater says - Posted: September 25, 2013

    I VOTE NO TOO. There are always angles for the administrators to argue in favor of better schools. They can always tug at people’s hearts claiming this is for the children, or this is investing in the future. Their hidden agenda means more money for themselves. The classes that would be added here are classes already offered at four year schools. No one is stopping higher education. Our small tax payer population cannot support a four year college.

  11. snoheather says - Posted: September 25, 2013

    The college is currently offering a class at the high school’s new facilities – MUS 119A: Pro Tools 101. This is the first quarter and the class is full.
    The college is in need of improvements to stay updated and draw in students. To say that the administrators are self serving is completely inaccurate. I feel there is a strong desire to better the school because in the long run it will benefit the community as a whole. Imagine if the college was a leader in fields like sciences or environmental issues. It would bring people to the area and benefit the community in many ways.

  12. MTT says - Posted: September 26, 2013

    38 million is a bunch of money.
    I have no dog in this fight but it would be interesting to see the line item list on
    38 MILLION in improvements.

  13. tahoe Pizza Eater says - Posted: September 26, 2013

    GREAT POINT MTT 5 or 10 million would probably build the entire science building. Add 1 million more to equip the classes, and more money for staff. They probably plan on 25 million of waist. Maybe there is a building contractor hoping to make a killing on this. When you take a closer look at this proposal, it’s bordering on crazy.

  14. snoheather says - Posted: September 27, 2013

    “25 million of waist” must require really large pants. :)