THIS IS AN ARCHIVE OF LAKE TAHOE NEWS, WHICH WAS OPERATIONAL FROM 2009-2018. IT IS FREELY AVAILABLE FOR RESEARCH. THE WEBSITE IS NO LONGER UPDATED WITH NEW ARTICLES.

More chewing may be the way to ingest fewer calories


image_pdfimage_print

By Heidi Mitchell, Wall Street Journal

Over the holidays, Americans will undoubtedly overindulge, gulping down their first plateful and racing back for seconds. But is there an optimal way to masticate?

One expert, Klaus Bielefeldt, director of the Neurogastroenterology & Motility Center at the University of Pittsburgh, chews on the subject.

Digestion starts in the mouth, says Bielefeldt, and chewing initiates the process.

“Mechanically, chewing breaks down the food into tiny pieces so that it is easier to digest,” he says. “Chemically, chewing releases saliva, a lubricant that helps food to slide down the esophagus and begin the breakdown of carbohydrates with the help of the enzyme amylase.”

The longer you chew, the more fragmented food particles become, which eases the digestive process in the gut and stomach.

“And you won’t swallow a whole toothpick that someone left in the turkey, which I’ve seen,” says Bielefeldt.

Read the whole story

image_pdfimage_print

About author

This article was written by admin

Comments

Comments (2)
  1. Jeffy says - Posted: November 22, 2013

    I am reading “Drop Dead Healthy” by AJ Jacobs right now. It’s hilarious. He carries a shrimp fork in his back pocket to take smaller mouthfuls and he also chews with purpose. Besides making us laugh, he also gets results from it!

  2. Garry Bowen says - Posted: November 23, 2013

    Funny – reading ‘the whole story’, 32 and 35 times are mentioned, then analyzed further as to digestive effects. . .my grandfather, Noble Merry, always told us to chew “22 times” – where that came from I really don’t know, but it appears “on the money” as to those higher amounts – is this one of those “old-husbands” tales (?) . . .or “common” sense from that era, passed down. . . hmmm !?

    Good information, though. . .