THIS IS AN ARCHIVE OF LAKE TAHOE NEWS, WHICH WAS OPERATIONAL FROM 2009-2018. IT IS FREELY AVAILABLE FOR RESEARCH. THE WEBSITE IS NO LONGER UPDATED WITH NEW ARTICLES.

Opinion: Calif. wrong not to test students


image_pdfimage_print

By George Miller and Russlynn Ali

You don’t need a crystal ball to see America’s future. Just look inside California’s classrooms, where you’ll find 1 in 8 American children. How our country does tomorrow depends on how California’s schools do today. Will America be ready to compete? Are our students on track for success in college or career? Which schools are doing well and which need improvement?

Last month, Gov. Jerry Brown signed misguided legislation that makes all of those essential questions harder to answer. Under AB484, for the first time in nearly two decades, California won’t test all of its students, won’t provide data about student performance to parents, teachers or schools, and will not hold itself accountable for raising student achievement.

Brown and Superintendent of Public Instruction Tom Torlakson heralded AB484 as a modernizing move to implement the new standards known as the Common Core, adopted by California and 44 other states. The theory is that we should throw away the old tests and start a year from now with the new tests, but in the interim we’ll stop giving vital information to parents and students. AB484 effectively blindfolds educators during this transition at a time when it’s most critical to measure student learning to inform instructional change.

Thoughtful implementation of Common Core is an important issue facing states and school districts across the country. But eliminating testing, even if just for a couple of years, is not the solution. Other states such as New York, Kentucky and Massachusetts are working through this challenge by aligning their testing systems with the new standards and helping parents understand that, with new assessments, initial drops in test scores are expected. They are making sure students are comfortable with new computer-based assessments, and are helping teachers get ready to use the new testing and evaluation systems, giving them several years before any consequences are tied to new assessments.

These states are making the difficult but necessary transition to higher standards without compromising on important values, like a parent’s and a student’s right to know how they are performing; a teacher’s need to know which students deserve extra attention; whether the rights to equal education are being upheld for students with disabilities and English learners; and the state’s responsibility to hold itself, its districts and its schools accountable for student achievement.

Elected leaders in California, instead, have chosen to fly blind for the next few years. And in so doing, they are defying the will of the people. According to a Rossier/PACE poll of California voters, 66 percent of parents with school-age children believe students should be tested in each grade to ensure they are progressing.

California annually receives more than $3.5 billion in federal funds designed to protect the civil rights of and promote educational opportunity for students. As part of its plan with the federal government to receive those funds, California agreed to assess students annually and report on the performance of poor students, students of color, students with disabilities and English learners. AB484 violates the state’s agreements with the federal government, threatening access to the federal funds California relies on to serve its most disadvantaged students.

Worse still, the new law will force districts throughout the state to violate the nation’s civil rights statutes, laws the Obama administration is required to enforce. Without the federal government as the guarantor of its people’s civil rights, progress toward equity has historically faltered.

Brown and the Legislature have restored America’s largest state to fiscal solvency, even in the middle of the worst economic crisis since the Depression. They deserve credit and our deepest gratitude.

However, we must have an honest conversation about our state’s ability to provide a world-class education. California ranks 47th among all states in eighth-grade math, and 45th in fourth-grade reading – and the long-term consequences of drift and delay are incalculable. The Common Core provides the promise and the opportunity for California to again lead the country in education, but not if the state blocks access to student performance data, even for a couple years.

A year is a valuable time in a child’s education. That’s why we are standing alongside a coalition of California parents, advocates, civil rights leaders, educators and teachers coming together with our lawmakers to rethink AB484. They know this is no time for a blackout on student testing.

Californians have a choice. We can stop assessing our students and schools, and stifle progress, furthering the growing perception that our state’s best public education days are behind us. Or we can transition responsibly to new, better standards and uphold California’s education system as one that truly serves the needs of all children.

Rep. George Miller, D-Martinez, is the senior Democratic member of the House Education and the Workforce Committee. Russlynn Ali is the chair of the Emerson Education Fund at the Emerson Collective in Palo Alto, and was the assistant secretary of education for civil rights in the Obama administration.

image_pdfimage_print

About author

This article was written by admin

Comments

Comments (3)
  1. tahoe Pizza Eater says - Posted: November 7, 2013

    This lack of testing puts students at great risk of failure in college. What will happen in the poorer performing schools is that the students and parents will compare the student performance against poor performers. This causes an average student to excel in a poor school. Consequently, when the student reaches college, they learn that their reading, and math skills are not sufficient to perform at the college level. Because they got such great grades in high school, they’ll not understand what went wrong. Universal testing standards avoids this false idea of excellence which comes from comparing one’s self to substandard performers. This is more easily understood when a high school ball player thinks he is a great player when he is in high school, then he goes to college and finds that he cannot make the team. This is very common in sports. We cannot afford for this to happen in academics. Testing will prevent schools from falsely representing that they are getting the job done.

  2. Lisa says - Posted: November 7, 2013

    Pizza Eater, this bill will not do away with grades or SATs or other measures.Students will know very well how they perform. My daughter tested at close to the remedial level on standardized tests in elementary school. In high school she tested at the very low level (lower 30-60%). At her high school which was academically VERY rigorous a(100% college acceptance rate, 22 kids with 4.3 or better), she was a 4.0 student. In college she has a near straight A average as well…some kids just don’t test well and this is especially true for perfectionist kids.

  3. Local Yokle says - Posted: November 10, 2013

    To graduate High School student’s have to pass their classes, pass the California High School Exit Exam (CAHSEE), submit a senior project and if they want go to College, take the SAT and/or ACT. How many ways to we need to verify that kids are passing our multiple layers of Standards before we consider them successful and passing?

    Yes, we need to test our student’s knowledge and verify the schools are meeting standards. The question is how many different ways do we need to do so before it becomes not only ridiculous but a complete waste of time and money? California courses are aligned to standards which every student must meet – Test 1. Kids have to pass the CAHSEE – Test 2. Kids must demonstrate a comprehensive project – Test 3. For those going to college most will need to take the SAT or ACT – Test 4. Now we need to add another layer of testing?

    Every so called Standardized Testing System used has been discontinued after a decade or so. None of the Standardized Tests have been in use long enough to get very good or accurate data; Standardized Tests are flawed in their duration and the assumption that all students come from the same background, educational experience and language background. Standardized Tests are statistically flawed.

    If our schools have good standards the real proof on that school’s success will be how many graduate and how many are accepted at one more more colleges or find gainful employment after going through the system. Acceptance and success in College is the one qualifier that is fairly consistent across all student populations while testing to National or State standards assumes that all student’s are the same and will test equally. You can not tell me an immigrant student learning English while in school, possibly in an impoverished area will have the same educational experience as a student from an established family of modest income or better in a middle class or high income area. To expect schools with different student populations and different funding environments to all perform at the same level is to ignore reality. No two students are the same and not two schools are the same.

    My two cents.
    Local Yokle