SLT council can’t decide how to allocate surplus
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/78222/782229caef0d6b5d5905731d581d51d1820fd9fc" alt="Jim Marino with the South Lake Tahoe Public Works Department goes over the dilapidated conditions of city infrastructure at the Feb. 10 workshop. Photo/Kathryn Reed"
Jim Marino with the South Lake Tahoe Public Works Department goes over the dilapidated conditions of city infrastructure at the Feb. 10 workshop. Photos/Kathryn Reed
By Kathryn Reed
A workshop Monday was designed for the South Lake Tahoe City Council to figure out how to allocate any surpluses so policy is in place before the money is in hand and it doesn’t get wasted. The council fell short of that goal.
City Manager Nancy Kerry said part of the goal was “to be more strategic” so the council, and therefore staff, would have a policy to follow instead of being reactive.
While some council members talked about divvying up the money by percentages, no consensus was found to create such a policy. Although hotel tax dollars are not as robust in January and February because of the lack of snow, there is still the possibility that at the March mid-year budget session a half million dollars will need to be allocated.
Instead, the council adopted a community investment policy that says, “We will focus on the built environment based on critical need and prioritize investment in geographic locations that strive to achieve the greatest return on investment.”
A line item will be added to the budget for the community investment. But there was no true definition of the investment.
South Lake Tahoe has plenty of things it needs to spend money on, but the money to do so is lacking. However, revenues are on the upswing, so such a policy is needed so the money is not frittered away.
Only two members of the public attended the 2½-hour meeting. Neither spoke.
While these five electeds heard a presentation from public works about the need for roads, facilities and fleet investments, any council could redefine community investment. Even these five, while sympathetic to the needs, did not commit to their being the focus of any new money.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/de951/de9513ae4c786e3b8c991dcc608d41280b69c2cd" alt="The South Lake Tahoe City Council members, from left, Tom Davis, JoAnn Conner, Angela Swanson, Hal Cole and Brooke Laine, are unable to decide how to deal with potential surpluses."
The South Lake Tahoe City Council members, from left, Tom Davis, JoAnn Conner, Angela Swanson, Hal Cole and Brooke Laine, are unable to decide Feb. 10 how to deal with potential budget surpluses.
Jim Marino, No. 2 guy at public works, said if the 256 lane miles of city roads had been maintained properly, the weather the past few days would not have created the number of potholes that it has.
He told the council more than 47 percent of the roads in the city have about five years of life left to them. It would cost $119,522,327 to replace current roads. The deferred maintenance backlog is at more than $26 million. If no more money is put toward roads, the deferred maintenance bill grows by $3 million annually.
To fix the roads, replace aging vehicles and bring facilities into the 21st century, the city would need to spend about $300 million, Marino said.
While the city has seen $80.5 million worth of capital improvements this century, 71 percent of those dollars came from state or federal sources.
“Those are new facilities we need to maintain,” Marino pointed out. But the maintenance fund has not increased. That is why the deferred maintenance bill keeps increasing.
There was agreement that recreation should be its own category when it comes to “extra” investing.
The other thing the council agreed to on Feb. 10 was for an analysis of the reserve policy to be conducted.
Consultant Mike Levison, who has a history of helping the city with strategic planning, said most cities have a reserve of about 18 percent. South Lake Tahoe, more than 10 years ago, set the policy to have a 25 percent reserve. This was after not having any extra in the kitty.
Excess reserves – money beyond the 25 percent – have been used in the lean years of late. But the 25 percent has not been tapped. To alter the 25 percent rule would take four out the five council members.
In other action:
• There was talk of Tahoe Olympians. Sierra-at-Tahoe is taking the lead in figuring out how best to celebrate the accomplishments of its three Olympians – Jamie Anderson, Hannah Teter and Maddie Bowman. All are residents of Meyers. South Lake Tahoe and Lake Tahoe Visitors Authority have offered to help. What the community event will be has not been determined. Sierra is not allowed to advertise anything involving its athletes until the Games are over.
• El Dorado County Elections Department has ruled that if the council at its regular meeting Feb. 18 decides to put a paid parking question to voters, that it can be on the June ballot.
They could use the money to take out the parking meters.
How about lowering some of the higher taxes and extra fees charged to city taxpayers and shoppers, level the playing field so the city is commensurate with surrounding areas.
Higher city sales tax, telephone tax, business tax rate, higher animal control surcharge fees, to name just a few. It is no wonder so many city employees live outside the city limits.
ZZ Top,
“They could use the money to take out the parking meters”. Thanks for making me smile this morning with your suggestion and also for making sense. Good idea! OLS
How about save it for a rainy day…
ZZ, OLS, Count me in.
The motion has been made and seconded. All in favor . . .
I don’t know why this slipped my mind about what to do with the surplus in the city budget? Hire a consultant!!! Of course! Thats alway the answer, right? A consultant can tell the city where to spend whats left of the money.
Okay, City Council , I’m joking. Do not hire a consultant although I’m sure you’ve got several on speed dial.
But seriously I think it should be invested in something safe with a good return in interest and also will be tax free untill withdrawl from said accounts.
This would give the city a little something to fall back on if we find ourselves in a tough spot.
Just my thought’s on the matter. Thanks, OLS
What about helping out some of the great nonprofits in town.
Why is it necessary to figure out a way to spend a surplus? What is wrong with having something put aside for a ‘rainy day’? I agree with A.B. Or perhaps OLS is right. Hire a consultant to tell us how to spend our money.
This is why I live in the county. I can honestly say I had nothing to do with electing these people.
Pay off the parking meters and pull them out. End the program and let the business enjoy a summer of making money that they lost last summer. Residents and tourists go back to the beaches in the city, propertys get rid of all the no parking/permit parking signs.
We all know there is no surplus. Road repair alone would eat that money up in a second.
These pot holes are getting very bad over by the Y ,I HAVE TO DRIVE AROUND THEM,,NOT GOOD, SEAL THEM PLEASE,
One note that never seems to come up about paid parking al Lakeview Commons parking lot and the revenue stream. Lakeview Commons is closed for the season. No thoughts just an observation.
Sidewalks, roads, hello? The crumbling roads here are like driving around in a third world country. Didn’t the article already say there is a 25% rainy day fund? The plows and graders the city uses look like they belong in a musuem. Caltrans has modern snow plows, the city plows look podunk – like the crappy streets.
Roads, roads, roads
Kenny, Lakeview Commons never really closes. The concessions just aren’t there.
Drive down there and read what the sign says at the entrance to the commons area. I was only pointing out that the city or someone put a sign up there that says closed for the season. Parking lot is open and plowed but the commons area is closed.
Kenny is correct. The City has posted signs at Regan Beach and Lakeview Commons stating “Closed for the Season”. Just more confusing signage from the city. El Dorado Beach is closed, but the vehicle parking is $10.00 per day.
In regards to the million dollar plus surplus, let’s put it into the two core services that have been most neglected: Road repairs and snow removal equipment.
Ken “skibum”Curtzwiler,
Thanks for once again for setting me straight on all of this new fangeled wordage. Much appreciated!
I was wondering what your take is on this proposed development in Meyers might be? Good, bad or indifferent? I’m sure you have an opinion as you seem to be a man of strong convictions. So, lets hear em’. OLS
(I may be somewhat of a gaper but I ain’t no YEC) yuck, yuck.
Aye, pizza eater, et al.
How can the city charge a user fee(parking) on a closed beach? Houston we have a problem!