West Tahoe fault overdue for major temblor
By Jessie Marchesseau
Anyone who has lived in Lake Tahoe for a while has heard stories of the impending tsunami if an earthquake occurs. In reality, those stories may not be too far off. And the earthquake may not be either.
The California Geological Survey has been taking a closer look at the West Tahoe fault, the most active and most hazardous of the three faults in the Lake Tahoe Basin. Last October, the agency dug a trench approximately 15 feet deep and 15 feet wide across part of the fault near Meyers.
The project was years in the making, with the CGS working closely with the TRPA, USFS and Lahontan making sure the project was a low-impact as possible. The trench has already been filled in again and the land restored.
Gordon Seitz, engineering geologist with the CGS and lead on this project, said trenches are a relatively common way to study fault lines. By examining and sampling layers of sediment below the surface, geologists can determine frequency and magnitude of past earthquakes.
Seitz and his crew were able to learn quite a bit about what has happened at the fault since the last Ice Age (about 12,000 years ago). They found two earthquakes, each one shifting the earth on the west side of the fault higher than the east side resulting in a full 12-foot difference between the two sides.
“If we had an earthquake tomorrow, there would be a step, a vertical step on the fault,” Seitz told Lake Tahoe News. “It would be about 6-feet high.”
An earthquake tomorrow is not exactly out of the question, either. It will be a few more months before exact results are back from the lab, but so far it looks as if earthquakes happen on the West Tahoe fault about every 4,000 years. And how long has it been since the last one? About 4,000 years.
“If it happened tomorrow in Tahoe, I wouldn’t be surprised. But I’m not expecting it to either,” Seitz said.
The West Tahoe fault travels from just west of Meyers through Fallen Leaf Lake, down into the bottom of Lake Tahoe and back out again near Dollar Point. What Seitz said makes the Tahoe area so interesting is that in most places the biggest hazard during an earthquake is the shaking, but when the west side of the fault, 1,200 feet below the surface of Lake Tahoe, rises up 6, maybe even as much as 18-feet higher than the east side, a giant wave will ensue.
“If we have a shift like we see in the trench at the bottom of the lake, we will have a large wave, that’s a given,” Seitz said. “What we don’t know is how big the wave is or the impact.”
This is something else he is working on. Last July, Seitz was part of a team that took a remotely operated submarine-like vehicle 1,100 feet down into Lake Tahoe. What they saw was not a 12-foot step from the west to the east side of the fault like in Meyers, but a 36-foot step. This means there are either more earthquakes down there, or they are just bigger.
The team hopes to take the remote operated vehicle down again this summer for further investigation, and to hopefully determine which of those scenarios it really is.
Seitz expects to have solid data on the earthquakes of the West Tahoe fault within the next five years. However, he said the more difficult part of all of this is what to do with that data. The hope is to have reports, maps and computer models to explain where the fault is and how it and the waters of Lake Tahoe will behave in different scenarios. All this could be used for future planning in our communities, especially in the realm of emergency response plans.
“Overall, even though it sounds scary,” Seitz said, “it should make people feel better that we’re working on it.”
In prior earthquakes that I’ve been in, I’ve notice landfill with infrastructure built on top tends to take a very hard hit. Almost all of the Keys subdivision is on landfill. Is it time to reevaluate restoring the filter to the biggest river entering Lake Tahoe by ripping out some of the landfill development?
I wouldn’t be too concerned about a seismic event in this region.
The region that’s well overdue for a major seismic event is the Bay Area, and when it happens, the devastation will be of biblical proportion.
You two talk like you have a lot of geological and seismological knowledge and experience. But your comments are right out of newspaper summaries instead of from the scientists that actually study the situation.
Perry, if a big shallow, lateral shaker happens, the Keys situation will take care of itself. Boom, instant filter restoration. We don’t need to spend the money and 40 years of lawsuits trying to do an imminent domain action to destroy the Keys subdivision.
A.B., I am not comforted at all by your advice that you “wouldn’t be too concerned about a seismic event in this region.”
What region would you be talking about? What is the basis of your comment?
Measurable seismic events are extremely common in the Tahoe basin and surrounding area. Even small ones can be terrifying if you are up close and wondering if your house is about to leave its foundation.
The myriad small events could be a slow pressure release,contributing to a decrease in the the overall pressure on the fault, therefore less likely to end in a sudden major shift, OR it could be in response to elevated stress build up, and indicating a situation more likely to end in a sudden rock/fault shift of significant magnitude. (The BIG ONE!)
The constant monitoring of position, depth of epicenter and magnitude of individual small ‘quakes provides a lot of information to sort out if we are dealing with the former or the latter of the two options briefly described above.
Do you think the comment that it was approximately 4000 years between major events and that the last one was about 4000 years ago (according to available data) from the Geologists working on the problem came out of the air?
Maybe they should just quit the studying and ask you.
Observer says, I believe the legal term is eminent domain, not imminent domain. Certainly something taking place over 40 years would not be considered imminent.
but, don’t stop the with the smack down of your fellow posters, your making yourself look really good…
Too bad they didn’t give tours of the site before they filled it in. I would have liked to have seen it and it would have been great for the kids.
“Observer says, I believe the legal term is eminent domain, not imminent domain. Certainly something taking place over 40 years would not be considered imminent.
but, don’t stop the with the smack down of your fellow posters, your making yourself look really good…”
*you’re
I’d rather live in Tahoe Keys when the firestorm hits SLT, than worry
about any possible tsunami.