Calif. cities, police chiefs change tune on pot
By Peter Hecht, Sacramento Bee
The last time lawmakers tried to regulate California’s medical marijuana industry, the League of California Cities warned of “a radical expansion of existing law” and “a slippery slope to distribution of marijuana for recreational use.” And police groups rushed out talking points protesting the “creation of a massive, for-profit medical marijuana model.”
California cities and police were long considered obstructionists to regulatory legislation they said would legitimize marijuana businesses. But now they are jumping into the marijuana-regulation effort out of fear that the state is inevitably moving toward a sanctioned cannabis industry with or without their input.
Expressing alarm over the changing “marijuana arena,” the League of California Cities and the California Police Chiefs Association announced Feb. 21 that they are dropping their policy of “unconditional opposition” to laws sanctioning marijuana businesses in California. They are backing a new bill that would license medical marijuana dispensaries and cultivators while setting new restrictions on doctors recommending marijuana to patients.
“We also realized that without our proactive intervention, it could take a form that was severely damaging to our interests.”
I guess that says it all. I sure hope they don’t have their helicopters and assault toys taken away.
There is a fascinating history of ignoring medical opinion on this subject starting about three years after the enactment of the Harrison Act of 1914. A selection of medical opinions on the effects of the Act over the years is presented in an article at:http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/library/studies/cu/cu8.html
I would be naive to think that this is the only data available but it is truly amazing that so many studies can be ignored. The true conservative notion would be to get out of drug enforcement completely, IMHO.