Future governance of Meyers up in the air
By Kathryn Reed
Who will be the voice for Meyers once the area plan process is through?
That answer remains to be seen.
At recent meetings regarding the Meyers Area Plan residents have said they want more say in what happens to their enclave that sits at the base of Echo Summit to the west of the city limits of South Lake Tahoe. Being in the unincorporated area of El Dorado County residents are governed by the Board of Supervisors who are based in Placerville, as well as the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency.
Forming a community services district has been talked about as a way to take what is the current Meyers Advisory Council and formalize it more. (The MAC evolved out of the Meyers Roundtable.)
Brendan Ferry, chief planner for El Dorado County, told Lake Tahoe News, “(The Meyers Area Plan) still formalizes the MAC as an official body of the county. It is just expanded to include the possibility of forming a CSD in the future. In that case the CSD board would essentially be the MAC.”
Here is the exact language in what is now the third draft of the Meyers Area Plan:
“Policy 1.2: El Dorado County shall establish and maintain a Meyers Advisory Council (MAC), with regularly scheduled and publically noticed meetings, to provide recommendations to the Planning Commission, County Board of Supervisors, and/or TRPA on the implementation of this Plan. The MAC shall include seven residents or property owners in the Lake Tahoe Region of unincorporated El Dorado County. The MAC shall include community members representing business, environmental, recreation, and other appropriate interests necessary to carry out the vision of the Meyers Area Plan. The MAC shall be comprised of elected board members of a Community Services District or other appropriate special district, or if no appropriate entity exists, the MAC members may be appointed by the El Dorado County Board of Supervisors.”
There is another meeting about the plan on June 26; at which time it’s possible the CSD will be discussed.
David Reichel, who is on the MAC, said at no time did that body make a formal recommendation to the community as a whole or to county staff about what it would like the MAC to be in the future.
“I’m aware people are looking at other options to make the body more formal,” Reichel told Lake Tahoe News.
A CSD is also a taxing entity and has elected board members. CSDs usually get a portion of property taxes or assess the area an additional tax that would be used just for that particular CSD’s business. But it can be an uphill battle to tap into the existing property tax allotment because it would mean some other entity would then be given less money.
LAFCo (Local Area Formation Commission) is the only governing body authorized to form districts. The three ways to get LAFCo’s attention is through voter petition, the landowner and petition by another agency.
The Legislature treats a CSD like it’s a junior city. But land use is not something a CSD has jurisdiction over. And land use is the overriding issue Meyers area residents want to control based on comments at public meetings for the past two years.
“If you want to have some kind of role in development issues, it would best to petition the Board of Supervisors to create some kind of advisory board that will give them input on what kind of development is going through,” Jose Enriquez, El Dorado County LAFCo executive director, told Lake Tahoe News.
He said Pollock Pines and other West Slope communities have these types of advisory boards. The Board of Supervisors appoints those members.
Enriquez said CSDs are usually formed for municipal services like fire, parks, and lighting-landscaping.
“If you want to be a land use regulating agency and not deal with the Board of Supervisors, then you form your own city,” Enriquez said. “That is a much larger discussion.”
Even though LAFCo doesn’t see a CSD being the correct route for Meyers, in the cover letter released earlier this month about the current draft Meyers Area Plan, it says, “Many community members have expressed a desire for a locally elected body to review project proposals in Meyers and to maintain and update the plan in the future. In response, the county is evaluating the establishment of a Community Services District, which would review proposed projects in Meyers, initiate future revisions to the plan, and direct some funding for local improvement projects. If established, this Community Services District would be comprised of a board directly elected by Meyers residents, and it would fulfill the role of the Meyers Advisory Council described in the plan.”
Neither El Doardo County Chief Administrator Terri Daly nor Supervisor Norma Santiago is responding to inquiries from Lake Tahoe News. The outside flack hired by Daly to deal with the media told LTN to attend this week’s meeting to have questions answered.
If Meyers went through with a CSD, it would also have to define what Meyers is in terms of geographic boundaries. Only property owners in that CSD would be taxed and have a say in who is on the CSD board.
Meyers could also form a business improvement district like the property owners along Ski Run Boulevard in South Lake Tahoe did. Or they could do like the South Lake Tahoe lodging establishments and form a tourism improvement district. These, though, are both taxing entities that would require those affected to vote on creating the districts and vote to tax themselves.
——
Notes:
• The next meeting is June 26, 6pm at the CCC building in Meyers.
• The draft plan is available online.
• Here are the proposed Meyers Area Plan revisions.
• Comments may be submitted to MeyersAreaPlan@edcgov.us.
• Future meetings: El Dorado County Planning Commission – Aug. 28, Placerville; El Dorado County Board of Supervisors – Sept. 9, Placerville; Tahoe Regional Planning Agency Advisory Planning Commission – Sept. 10, Stateline; Tahoe Regional Planning Agency Governing Board – Oct. 22, Stateline.
I only want to encourage all of you to look at what is already in place in the Meyers community. Meyers has a district in place and it is the Tahoe Paradise Resort Improvement District (TRID). These districts throughout California are referred to “Special District”. The Resort Improvement Districts are an older version of a community district but serve the designated boundary of the district. The service includes various needs of the community. LAFCO has tried, along with the board of supervisors to change Meyers TRID to a community district / Rec District by supporting the SB 1023. Please google …SB 1023 Tahoe Paradise Resort Improvement District.
Meyers needs to either break off from the County and a new County be formed from christmas valley to stateline or become a town. Special districts and advisory boards really don’t have much influence. If no one really knows about the Tahoe Paradise board, it isn’t very influential. Meyers is ready to become its own town and we are all ready to form our own county. County sups don’t give two cents about us.
Agree with Frank. All these latest El Dorado shenanigans lead me to lean more towards the idea of forming our own county, we are two vastly different areas, with different needs and different philosophies on how to get there. The West Slope should be free to run things their way, and so should we at the lake.
The people that want a new County or a City are not lookinjg at the reality of such a decision.
The financial issues alone connected with being a county or an incorporated city would take many years to sort out.
We’d likely end up with another south lake tahoe or El Dorado county situation and the same related corruption and special interests steering the ship.
As behind the scenes says, we need to work with what we have first before it is too late.
Detailed fact checking is one way to make headway quickly as all the agencies have produced their share of feel-good, we are on your side banalities that don’t always add up.
With these misleading facts and statements out in the air, a case can then be made for what the actual process is supposed to be creating.
Forming a new county would have huge costs implications. This new County would need its own assessor, clerk recorder, sheriff, human resourses, road maintenance, snow plows, environmental health, jail etc. This redundancy in administration would be paid for by a very small population, instead of being spread across a much larger population and tax base. OK so maybe you would suggest we not pay these newly created administration bureaucrats health care, retirement or competative salaries. My guess is that you would end up with equal or greater ineptitude than currently experienced under EDC.
“The outside flack…”
And that kind of writing is why this blog is only taken seriously by the few.
I have no connection with the County gvt.
Please don’t give up Meyers! ACommunity service district is run by the county and the money goes to them. So what has just happened is they gave you 35 feet but what they added in the plan document was that for the next 20 or more years the county will call the shots for Meyers. It no longer will be the community. This goes to why the committee was hand picked with no community involvement to now having the county directly delegated the control in the Meyers Plan. Really, have we truly reviewed the doc but we (the community) have not even discussed the zones and uses. Many of u have been BULLied in the community but we need u because you have actually done the right thing and you have people that believe in you.
Do any of the “real” Meyers people realize that the Ahwahnee Hotel in Yosemite Valley is over seven stories high? So, I am just guessing that if someone wanted to duplicate the Ahwahnee Hotel in Meyers, “real” Meyers would be against it?