THIS IS AN ARCHIVE OF LAKE TAHOE NEWS, WHICH WAS OPERATIONAL FROM 2009-2018. IT IS FREELY AVAILABLE FOR RESEARCH. THE WEBSITE IS NO LONGER UPDATED WITH NEW ARTICLES.

Letter: Meyers deserves more than political hyperbole


image_pdfimage_print

To the community,

I love my old truck even though it’s a little unsightly. It always gets me there and back, gets good gas mileage and it’s paid for. It is not the end of the world if I spill a little paint in the truck bed or load a river-wet dog into the front seat. Indeed, my yellow Lab believes stoplights are made for shaking.

I can be seen on any summer day, at any red light, with muddy water dripping from my face and arms, and a spiky-wet yellow dog laughing next to me.

Just last week, I was disheartened to hear, yet again, from one of our public servants, that “The Meyers people want a bikeable/walkable community so there will be no need for cars”. No, we never said that. However, the county and TRPA did say that and repeat it every chance they get. What was actually said at the meetings I attended was that we would like to have our bike paths finished.

Good grief, Pat Lowe would roll over in her grave if she knew how many grants were applied for to finish a bike path that was essentially paid for 20 years ago. As long as our bike paths remain unfinished, these “sustainable” groups and agency consultants will keep applying for grants and get them.

I also went around and around with the county regarding zone changes in Meyers. My shop was in the Commercial/Light Industrial zone, one of four separate zones in our commercial corridor. The TRPA’s Regional Plan update changed all four zones to one zone called Town Center, which is mixed use: residential, commercial, industrial, retail and tourist accommodation, all thrown together in a sort of “no-zone” zoning.

I asked what that means and the answer was akin to the old Abbot and Costello skit “Who’s on first”.

It went like this:

“Has my property zone changed?”

“No.”

“This new zoning map shows my property in the Town Center zone.”

“Yes.”

“So, is it Town Center or Commercial/Light Industrial?”

“It’s Commercial/Light Industrial.”

“Then why doesn’t the map say Commercial/Light industrial Zone?”

“Because you are zoned Town Center.”

“What?!”

No, what’s on third.

The walkable part of this bikeable/walkable community sounds all snuggly in theory, but I wouldn’t enjoy being forced to hump my groceries home every day because cars aren’t allowed. It’s simply unrealistic to “incentivize” people out of their cars. In the big city maybe, but not in Meyers. Who really wants to walk to an appointment in a snowstorm? Are we really going to walk to some new transit center, catch a bus to town, walk to another bus stop to catch another bus to Stateline or wherever? Do we really have that kind of spare time? And more important, are wet pets allowed on public transportation?

If you see “multi-use” in a planning document where “multi-use” wasn’t before, pay attention, your property value just changed. Why? Because now, a condo can be built right next door. Wonder how those tenants are going to feel when I fire up my panel saw at 10pm? Just like every other business owner, I work late far more often than I care to admit.

A housing project for seasonal ski resort employees could go in beside the Cabinet Shop. Have you ever experience the decibels of a high RPM power tool called a Router, at say, 6am? I can hear the sheriff’s banging on our doors already. If we can’t do our work in an area that we invested our money and futures on, in an area that was Commercial/Light Industrial but which the TRPA changed over 18 months ago without notification I might add, that, changes our property values and our lives. These small service businesses will be forced to move. Perhaps we don’t contribute enough tax dollars for the agencies liking? Perhaps a large housing project/condo/hotel would keep the TRPA fat for a while, but who is going to fix a frozen pipe or overflowing toilet on a freezing January night? By the time a plumber comes up from Gardnerville they’d be all wet. Which begs the question, are wet agency staffers allowed on public transportation?

Look, we have an outgoing county supervisor that is shoving this bikeable/walkable business down our throats. She has also been working hard to push this Meyer’s plan through, and sadly, will not disclose why this has to be adopted before she leaves office. Every candidate for Supervisor 5 has publicly stated that this plan should be held until after the election. They don’t want to inherit a nightmare any more than we residents do.

There was a private meeting three weeks ago that our supervisor organized to presumably have the six members of the Meyers Community Advisory Council vote this plan forward. As of this writing, the homeowner’s, business owners and residents of Meyers have not had access to this revised Meyer’s Area Plan. Thank goodness this was thwarted by a handful of party crashing Meyers residents who left work, left their important projects to stop this mess. They did not vote that day, nor did the attending MCAC endorse the plan.

I would hate to open the “paper” one day and read that “Meyers is thrilled to have their new area plan adopted and are moving forward to become the nation’s prototype for Pack & Stack living” but if we, as a community, don’t keep our eyes open, it just might happen.

For more information on the current Meyers Area Plan, go online.

Angela Olson, Meyers resident and business owner

image_pdfimage_print

About author

This article was written by admin

Comments

Comments (17)
  1. Dogula says - Posted: June 3, 2014

    Keep up the good fight, Angie! The powers that be are counting on people’s short attention spans to steamroll their “legacy” over Meyers. Glad you’re paying attention and continuing to inform people about what’s going on.

  2. Old Long Skiis says - Posted: June 3, 2014

    Angela Olson, A well written letter! You pretty much hit all the “hot spots”. Zoning changes without notification and a developement plan that a majority of people don’t want, closed door meetings, developement plans being rushed thru with approval of governing agencies without the public even knowing what’s going on!
    They will throw out all kinds of words, bikeable/wallkable, sustainable/envioronmentaly friendly, economicaly viable and a big boost to the community!… It’s all a bunch of B S!!! It is just a way to build on open land and clear cut more forest so somebody profits by putting in more residential/commercial buildings.
    Don’t we have enough empty homes and commercial properties already???
    I’m goin’ to vote, take care, OLS

  3. Shenja says - Posted: June 3, 2014

    I don’t think you have to worry about catching a bus anytime soon( and ” yes” some of us would make extra time to use)…. I’ve been told plenty of times now how el dorado county can’t afford to provide public transportation to Meyers and that nobody would use it if we did!… But if you want to go to Carson city or Gardnerville … No problem!.. Plenty of money and justification for that!

  4. J&B says - Posted: June 3, 2014

    Thank you Angie for telling it like it is! We live out here to get away from the noise, to see the stars at night, and live in a small, rural community. What right do TRPA and the County have to just take that away, all apparently so the agency can qualify for more sustainability grants to pay more consultants to plan more buildings for big corporations.

    Shenja, you are right. Better transit to town would be great, and there’s a simple solution. The agencies and resort interests need to get out of bed with the developers and corporations and start requiring them to pay their fair share towards transit. It’s not a novel concept – corporations are required to contribute heavily towards public transit in other places like Colorado.

    But in Tahoe, we are supposed to subsidize the corporations with free valuable development benefits, we help them profit by providing affordable housing for their employees so they can pay them as little as possible, we pay for the road maintenance although they draw millions of visitors who drive all over our roads each year…and on and on. Vail is laughing all the way to the bank…

  5. Dogula says - Posted: June 3, 2014

    J&B, you forgot to mention that your well-paid politicians, elected AND appointed, who enable those corporations by ignoring their constituents, are ALSO laughing all the way to the bank.

  6. orale says - Posted: June 3, 2014

    Everyone wants their own little cabin in the woods, away from the noise, so they can see the stars, and I get that, but that is what is bringing a lot of the pollution to the Lake. You have to drive every single time you have to run an errand or meet friends. roads have to be cut through the forest to your little cabin.

    One answer is to get people to live in areas where they can bicycle and walk to do things in the hopes that they realize that we are all loving this Lake to death.

  7. orale says - Posted: June 3, 2014

    If you want to live in a small, rural, community, move to Yerington. The fact is we live on the shores of an international treasure and there are responsibilities that come with that life.

  8. Cautious and Skeptical says - Posted: June 3, 2014

    Angela, thank you for the heartfelt locals perspective.
    It’s not just about improving the economic base and lining the pockets for just a few developers.
    That said, It’s not the VERY small population of folks in the outskirts of town driving in, it’s the tourists that DO NOT get out of their cars and use public transportation because the transportation system will NEVER be adequate enough or funded enough to make it viable. It’s also the redevelopment of the older hotels into Mega-Resorts that bring in more tourists that don’t get out of their cars. Also their is the Winter snow-removal, then Spring street cleaning of the sand that add to the equation. We do live with a Lake in our backyards that has a designation as an Outstanding National Resource Water which does come with additional responsibility and restrictions- not just economic viability but protection of the treasured Lake.

  9. J&B says - Posted: June 3, 2014

    orale, the existing residents in the area, driving maybe a few miles into town on roads built long ago, create far fewer impacts than the millions of miles driven by tourists coming to the Basin. And while TRPA is steamrolling over our community so they can qualify for grant dollars, they are permitting 1,000’s of new units in new, big resort hotels on now vacant natural land that will bring even more people to Tahoe. We’ve worked hard and struggled to be able to live here because that’s what we value. We endeavor to be good stewards because we respect the environment.

    That aside, per the TMDL Meyers contributes relatively little pollution to Lake Tahoe. TRPA’s plan to add more & new coverage by the Lake IS going to mean more pollution. And lest we not forget that the stackable/mixed-use concept TRPA promotes is based on a concept that only applies to downtown metro areas like the Bay Area, LA, and so on. It may reduce a trip here and there, but the new people that will come to the new big developments will create FAR MORE pollution than those of us out around Meyers now.

    We’ve invested in our homes and businesses here and have chosen to be part of this community. Why should we lose value in our investments and give up our quality of life so TRPA can help Vail and Edgewood build more?

    Dogula, you are right. It’s not just Vail counting their green…

  10. orale says - Posted: June 3, 2014

    ok – assuming what you say is true, that the existing residents of Meyers make little pollution, how does Meyers want to look in the future? Continue to allow people to build homes in the woods, encourage new people to live in areas that are more easily accessed by non-motorized transportation, or no new people? I think that is what we need to think about. And that is what needs to go in the plan.

  11. k9woods says - Posted: June 3, 2014

    Well written, Angela. I agree with most, except the rejection of that transport hub. I would make the time (but it would be nice if we could have the wet dogs too).

    I walk to the local restaurants in Meyers all the time from my home, and find the forest trails and roads very amenable during the spring, summer and fall. A pedestrian/bike crossing there in Meyers near Lira’s would be nice.

    Oh and to get everyone’s knickers in a twist, I vote for a roundabout at 89.

  12. rock4tahoe says - Posted: June 3, 2014

    Ok Angela, we get it. You like old trucks and dislike bicycles. So, if “somebody” wants to put in a Gondola from Meyers to say Echo then Sierra along with a parking garage etc; perhaps create some jobs. “Meyers” would be against that idea because it is “new” not “old?”

  13. Dogula says - Posted: June 3, 2014

    Rock, there’s no need to be argumentative. Angela never said she dislikes bicycles. She never said she dislikes new, or prefers old.
    You’re just making stuff up to pick on her.
    Stop it.

  14. Ice Gal says - Posted: June 3, 2014

    I would be surprised if that “old truck” got better than a measly 14 miles per gal.

  15. Irish Wahini says - Posted: June 3, 2014

    Kae, I hope you forward most of these emails to TRPA and to Supervisor Santiago’s office for her successorr. Put it on record. Santiago has NOT been a very good Supervisor and I am sorry I supported her to my neighbors, etc. Meyers’ residents are doing a great job of being vocal about these issues and I hope they keep it up. Grease those squeeky wheels! I am very proud of the Meyers Community! Keep speaking up…. and keep it publically voiced!

    And remember that Nevada was going to pull out of TRPA and scared them…- maybe California (locally) should threaten to do the same. DOCUMENT ALL CONVERSATIONS …

    If you call the Board of Supervisors (or the Feds, States, whoever might be connected), ask for the “Senior Aide” for Property Use/Zoning, etc. – get his/her name and notate your rehearsed conversation with them. Ask for the email address and their name (again) so you can use it in your emails to your representatives.

    They will get it…. you are not giving up. I fought the Golden Bear Park plan behind our neighborhood because it was INVASIVE TO OUR NEIGHBORHOOD and could be better placed at Bijou Park & the City land at LTCC – which is where it ended up successfully. Our representatives do not always have their heads screwed on right – but you can teach them. Some representatives, such as Norma Santiago, did not fulfill her campaign promise and, altho I supported her because of her flack, I am happy to see her go. Won’t be voting for her for anything in the future, will we?

  16. rock4tahoe says - Posted: June 12, 2014

    Dog. Angela said, “I love my old truck” and “she was disheartened to hear… Meyers people want a bikeable/walkable community” and “Who really wants to walk” and “shoving this bikeable/walkable business down our throats.” I made nothing up.

  17. rock4tahoe says - Posted: June 12, 2014

    Irish. You know what they say about opinions? Norma Santiago is the BEST County Supervisor we have had in decades. Perfect? No politician is. But, Norma has been a strong advocate of our part of the County in Placerville. What has McClintock, Ted or Beth Gaines done four our part of the County lately? What they do best…Nothing!