THIS IS AN ARCHIVE OF LAKE TAHOE NEWS, WHICH WAS OPERATIONAL FROM 2009-2018. IT IS FREELY AVAILABLE FOR RESEARCH. THE WEBSITE IS NO LONGER UPDATED WITH NEW ARTICLES.

Bike Coalition angry with Measure R spending


image_pdfimage_print

By Kathryn Reed

Money for bike trails or their maintenance was reduced by $10,000 on Friday by the South Lake Tahoe Recreation Facilities Joint Powers Authority board.

The money is going to the Tahoe Paradise Resort Improvement District. Two of the three JPA board members are also on the TPRID board – El Dorado County Supervisor Norma Santiago and Judy Clot. South Lake Tahoe City Councilwoman JoAnn Conner is the third JPA member.

At the annual financial meeting of the JPA board on July 25 there was an agenda item to up the TPRID allotment to $60,000 this year, a $10,000 increase. At the January board meeting TPRID will be tasked with bringing a proposal as to why it should receive even more money from Measure R funds beyond the stipulated $50,000 and this additional $10,000.

Voters in 2011 approved Measure R to replace Measure S, which was passed in 2000. South Shore residents on the California side pay $18 per year in property taxes for the measure. It sunsets in 2030.

Measure R allows old bike trails to be overhauled, like this one in South Lake Tahoe. Photo/Provided

Measure R allows old bike trails to be overhauled, like this one in South Lake Tahoe. Photo/Provided

Measure R loosened how money could be spent.

The key changes from S to R included giving ball fields $500,000 upfront. This is because the number of fields that Measure S was to build was never going to happen. The new wording allowed improvement to existing fields. It also allowed existing bike trails to be rehabbed. Bike trails would get more money after the fields got theirs, including any excess that would arrive via increased property taxes and/or bond refinancing. It was a gamble the bike community was willing to take – that there would be sufficient money.

The resolution says, “If funds remain after all of the above authorized and necessary funding has been provided for renovation of separated bicycle trails as provided in Facilities paragraph #5 and all of the above authorized and necessary funding has been provided for maintenance of bicycle trails as provided in Services paragraphs #3 and #4, such funds may be used, with the concurrence of the Bicycle Advisory Committee, for other bicycle related facilities, services, and/or programs within the CFD that promote and/or enhance bicycling within the CFD.”

Here is a copy of the resolution.

It does not say Tahoe Paradise or any other entity can tap into the funds.

Chuck Nelson, president of Lake Tahoe Bicycle Coalition, read a letter to the JPA board last week admonishing it for taking money from the bike community, especially without consulting the Bicycle Advisory Committee. The committee makes recommendations to the JPA board about how Measure R bike money should be spent.

John Upton, the lone staff member for the JPA, agreed the committee should have been consulted and said it would be going forward.

However, he and the three board members – especially Santiago and Conner – got into a debate with Nelson about what Measure R really says. Santiago and Conner were adamant that they could spend “extra” money however they want.

“Why does there need to be constant argument that the bike community is being cheated?” Conner said in a heated voice. “I really wish we could look at the bigger picture. I’d like to see an attitude of cooperation rather than argumentative.”

Upton, Santiago and Nelson were on Santiago’s one-time KTHO-AM 590 radio show prior to the 2011 vote. During the more than 20-minute show the three discussed where “extra” money goes. Bikes was the answer — at least at that time.

Despite the tiff over where money should be going, there are several bike projects in the works.

Shay Navarro, who is on the Bicycle Advisory Committee of the JPA, gave an overview of the work being done throughout South Lake Tahoe. This includes work behind McDonald’s at the Y, the trail behind Motel 6-Meeks, and near Harrison Avenue. Replacing the Trout Creek and Upper Truckee River bridges are also part of these projects.

All of the work should be done by the end of August.

If the work comes in under budget, the JPA board voted to spend $10,000 on a pilot snow removal program the bike committee wants to embark on. The committee plans to ask South Lake Tahoe for matching funds, of which Conner said should not be a problem to secure.

Santiago said the county is finalizing a contract to have snow removed on the Pat Lowe bike trail in Meyers.

She added that county staff is looking at a way to connect the Pat Lowe trail to the corner of Pioneer Trail and Highway 50. There is about a 200-foot gap that needs to be filled. This would be across California Tahoe Conservancy land, which Santiago said would not be a problem. (She sits on that board.)

“Caltrans is saying (they) don’t want you to do it because then (they) would have to put in a crosswalk,” Santiago said. “I say screw them. We have a connectivity issue.”

Caltrans this summer is slated to put in a crosswalk that goes north-south across Highway 50 at that intersection. Extending the bike trail would require one going east-west on Pioneer.

Santiago said the Sawmill Road bike trail and Lake Tahoe Boulevard enhancement projects should be done by the end of the grading season.
—–
Notes:

The JPA board will continue its July 25 meeting to Aug. 1 at 9am in the downstairs conference room at Lake Tahoe Airport to discuss the annual audit.

image_pdfimage_print

About author

This article was written by admin

Comments

Comments (15)
  1. Tahoe78 says - Posted: July 28, 2014

    No more money should go towards Tahoe Paradise Park until it’s cleaned up and made to look like a park and not a mechanics shop with outdoor bar. This park has so much potential and it’s being squandered. How about removing the speed bumps, removing the old damaged retaining wall by the river with rebar sticking out, and fixing the tennis courts. There is much more to add to the list, but this park is in a great spot that could be used for so much it’s frustrating to see it just sit there.

  2. Mel says - Posted: July 28, 2014

    What/where is this park and what does it have to do with bike trails?

  3. Chief Slowroller says - Posted: July 28, 2014

    Upton, Santiago and Conner are not part of the bicycle community.

    it is interesting that they make the decisions.

    Tahoe Paradise Park is run down.

    is the extra money going for wages to the guy who runs the Park?

  4. rebel with a cause says - Posted: July 28, 2014

    It’s all about politics. Let’s hear what Novasel and Curtzwiler have to say about the issue. One of them will be replacing Santiago after the election. Time for the candidates to speak up and not wait for a candidates forum.

  5. copper says - Posted: July 28, 2014

    “The Pat Lowe Trail?” Named for my least favorite South Lake Tahoe politician of all time? Who knew? Clearly I gotta get out more.

    (I suppose I have to concede Terry Trupp a spot on that “least favorite” list as well. I wonder what they’ll name after him?)

  6. Ralph says - Posted: July 28, 2014

    Mel,

    Based on my search

    1011 E. San Bernardino

  7. dumbfounded says - Posted: July 28, 2014

    The Bike People have received far more from this community than they give. Despite the bike trails built and maintained by the community, they continue to ride on roads. Indeed, the TPRID facility should be “cleaned up”, but denying funding will hardly help that goal. The TPRID has been underfunded for over twenty years. All I ever see is commentary that attacks the Park without any participation or investigation. I have some experience with naysayers that complain about the Park yet have never attended a single meeting. That is simply irresponsible, IMHO.

  8. Moral Hazard says - Posted: July 28, 2014

    “Why does there need to be constant argument that the bike community is being cheated?” Conner said in a heated voice. “I really wish we could look at the bigger picture. I’d like to see an attitude of cooperation rather than argumentative.”

    Translation: Everyone should just do what I say.

  9. 4-mer-usmc says - Posted: July 28, 2014

    Moral Hazard:

    Your observation is hilarious! I find it extremely ironic that this person who is always the most argumentative, is ill-mannered in her disagreements, and is the least likely to cooperate with anyone on anything on any governing body on which she serves is being critical of others for not being cooperative. What a joke!

  10. Moral Hazard says - Posted: July 28, 2014

    I wish there was a way to get professional managers onto the Council by paying wages for them. Like $75k – $100k per year or so. Something so that real managers would be willing to take on the job.

  11. Dogula says - Posted: July 28, 2014

    *snort*
    Yeah, throwing money at problems always fixes them. . . That’s the theory that the government has been using to steal more and more money from us for the last hundred years or so. . . and are things better? Nope.

  12. reza says - Posted: July 28, 2014

    Moral hazard, seems like the voters don’t want experienced managers. Only one of the current council has managerial experience within an org. with over 10 employees. Cole- nope; he is a contractor. Swanson-nope. Retail clerk and past-educational consultant. Connor – nope. Laine – not elected but runs a bank. Davis – ran marketing at a casino and most recently consulted for the Hard Rock owners; not sure he had much of a staff at the Mont Bleu when he was there.

    Moral, seems like the voters don’t want anyone with much business experience. We are a anti-corporate/large business bunch of voters. Not sure why but this seems to be the case.

  13. lou pierini says - Posted: July 28, 2014

    El Dorado county supervisors make $84,000.00 per year plus bennies and you like what we get from them?

  14. Toxic Warrior says - Posted: July 30, 2014

    Very Good Point Lou ……..
    What’s evident is how arrogant and omnipotent they become from sitting on too many other agency boards.
    It’s as if they have their own personal agenda after a while.

  15. cosa pescado says - Posted: July 30, 2014

    ‘and are things better? Nope’

    How many NASA related technologies or products are currently in your house?