THIS IS AN ARCHIVE OF LAKE TAHOE NEWS, WHICH WAS OPERATIONAL FROM 2009-2018. IT IS FREELY AVAILABLE FOR RESEARCH. THE WEBSITE IS NO LONGER UPDATED WITH NEW ARTICLES.

Scientists linking wildfire soot, climate change


image_pdfimage_print
These images show typical soot superagregattes observed with an electron microscope in wildfire smoke samples collected from three fires in Northern California, New Mexico and Mexico City. Credit: Desert Research Institute

These images show typical soot superagregattes observed with an electron microscope in wildfire smoke samples collected from three fires in Northern California, New Mexico and Mexico City. Photos/Desert Research Institute

By Science Daily

Every year, wildfires clear millions of hectares of land and emit about 34 percent of global soot mass into the atmosphere. In certain regions, such as Southeast Asia and Russia, these fires can contribute as much as 63 percent of regional soot mass.

In a paper published in Nature Scientific Reports, a team of scientists led by Rajan Chakrabarty from Reno’s Desert Research Institute report the observation of a previously unrecognized form of soot particle, identified by the authors as “superaggregates,” from wildfire emissions.

These newly identified particles were detected in smoke plumes from wildfires in Northern California, New Mexico, Mexico City, and India.

For several decades, scientists have been trying to quantitatively assess the impacts of wildfire soot particles on climate change and human health. However, due to the unpredictability of wildfire occurrences and the extreme difficulty in sampling smoke plumes in real-time, accurate knowledge of wildfire-emitted soot physical and optical properties has eluded the scientific community.

Read the whole story

image_pdfimage_print

About author

This article was written by admin

Comments

Comments (4)
  1. legal beagle says - Posted: July 22, 2014

    I have got the shovel out but I can’t keep up with the garbage from the political science community. Super
    aggregates, wow. Please.

  2. southie says - Posted: July 22, 2014

    Hmmm – burning trees is bad. Who’d of thought it?

    Is someone going to show this to TRPA and the Forest Service to convince them that burn piles, which release a couple hundred years of collect carbon back into atmosphere in a couple of days, are not the way clean out the basin?

    Can anyone say “Haul it out or chip it up”?

    Honestly, it’s like the right hand doesn’t want to know what the left hand is doing.

  3. A.B. says - Posted: July 22, 2014

    Please, another piece of garbage global warming story advancing the narrative? Get real.

  4. rock4tahoe.com says - Posted: July 27, 2014

    LegalB. Just because you don’t understand scientific climate models, radioactive decay and soot particles does not mean other do not.