THIS IS AN ARCHIVE OF LAKE TAHOE NEWS, WHICH WAS OPERATIONAL FROM 2009-2018. IT IS FREELY AVAILABLE FOR RESEARCH. THE WEBSITE IS NO LONGER UPDATED WITH NEW ARTICLES.

EDC residents wage ballot battle over growth


image_pdfimage_print

By Peter Hecht, Sacramento Bee

El Dorado County’s growth wars are headed to the November ballot with unexpected drama, quixotic political alliances and developer dollars flowing in conflicting directions.

Local environmentalists and advocates have qualified separate November initiatives – Measure M and Measure O – that seek to protect rural lifestyles, prevent gridlock on Highway 50 and stop traffic-inducing subdivisions in the Sierra foothills region.

Those initiatives, plus a third measure originally backed by a Sacramento group representing commercial builders, are drawing financial opposition from housing developers as well as real estate and engineering firms that are banking on continued residential growth in the county of 180,000 residents.

At stake are competing visions of the future for the county, where a 2004 general growth plan anticipates 21,000 new houses.

The latest ballot battles come 16 years after a voter revolt over the county’s approval of projects bringing 11,000 new houses to El Dorado Hills. Measure Y in 1998 prohibited any residential project of five or more units that caused or worsened traffic gridlock. It was reaffirmed by voters in 2008.

Read the whole story

 

image_pdfimage_print

About author

This article was written by admin

Comments

Comments (2)
  1. Toxic Warrior says - Posted: August 12, 2014

    Thank God we don’t have to worry about that here at Tahoe.
    We have TRPA and The Conservancy collaborating with Sustainability Corporations to commercially develop the crap out of Tahoe in lieu of residential construction.

  2. observer says - Posted: August 13, 2014

    I am very interested in what these multi-thousand units in subdivisions that are being peppered all over a lot of west slope land are going to do for water.

    Developers supposedly are charged for ensuring the utilities (power, water, sewage services, roads, communications) before plans are approved. Eldorado county is famous in the past for approving homes where the water source, for instance, was inadequate.

    Voter initiatives cannot solve over-development issues.
    Sad state of affairs in California where voters can vote for and demand services without a concomitant and viable way to pay the costs the demands incur.
    Then they complain about the rise in taxes and fees.

    Be careful what you ask for, you might get it.