Tahoe Queen not damaged, may sail in a week
By Kathryn Reed
The Tahoe Queen is structurally capable of operating, but because it does not have updated U.S. Coast Guard mandated paperwork in place it is sitting idle at Ski Run Marina in South Lake Tahoe.
The Coast Guard on Aug. 6 inspected the vessel to see if had been damaged. It wasn’t. The sightseeing paddle-wheeler ran aground Aug. 4 off Regan Beach with 257 passengers on board.
All were safely evacuated, mostly via small law enforcement boats.
The certificate of documentation is what’s delaying the boat from operating. This is similar to registering any watercraft with the state. The difference for the Queen is that because of its tonnage it is required to have the federal certification.
Coast Guard Lt. Theo Vaughan did not know now long the Queen has been out of compliance.
The Queen cannot carry passengers without the valid documents. Vaughan estimated the paperwork should be completed within a week.
“The vessel will be allowed to operate. The only thing pending is the administrative issue,” Vaughan told Lake Tahoe News.
The full investigation of what caused the Queen to launch itself onto the sandbar is ongoing. Vaughan said it could be two months before it is finished. The report must be signed off by folks at headquarters in Washington, D.C.
“The low level of the lake is definitely a contributing factor,” Vaughan said.
As for what might happen to the captain or any other crewmember remains to be seen.
“We will look at the report and see if any changes need to be made based on recommendations,” Dave Freirich, spokesman for Aramark – parent company of the Queen, told Lake Tahoe News.
2 months to determine the captain was reckless huh? Cross the t’s and dot the lowercase j’s.
Well if the Tahoe Queen is out of compliance. What about the M.S. Dixie?
It would seem both vessels owned by Aramark should get a full USCG inspection. Inspections for commercial vessels are VERY comprehensive & vessels must meet certain construction & safety requirements. Also, why letting federal documentation lapse, or never obtained in the first place, is highly suspect. Additionally, all responsibility for the grounding is ultimately & solely the Captain’s. Think Exxon Valdez.
This should be a straightforward investigation although it will take forever to get it signed off in Washington. The low water may have played a part, however you could clearly see the depth delineation even in the marginal TV film footage. You can’t tell me the Captain or helmsperson couldn’t see that from the bridge of the Queen.
I would have my concerns as well, but in deference to the crew and captain, the Queen is hindered by its propulsion system and geometric shape. It catches a lot of wind and can not always travel on what would otherwise be the desired line – on a number of occasions it has to wait offshore for winds to calm down so it can approach the dock. Without knowing all the details, the fact you could see the shallow water doesn’t mean the crew was unaware of where they were or where they wanted to be.
The only things damaged are pride and reputation.