THIS IS AN ARCHIVE OF LAKE TAHOE NEWS, WHICH WAS OPERATIONAL FROM 2009-2018. IT IS FREELY AVAILABLE FOR RESEARCH. THE WEBSITE IS NO LONGER UPDATED WITH NEW ARTICLES.

Palacio: ‘It’s time for a new generation’


image_pdfimage_print

Publisher’s note: Lake Tahoe News asked the seven South Lake Tahoe City Council candidates a series of questions. All are the same except for one that is specific to each candidate. The responses are being run in the order LTN received them.

matt palacioName: Matt Palacio

Profession/work experience: Did not respond.

Age: 34 (35 later this month)

What organizations, committees or groups are you or have you been involved with?: I’m a member of the Tahoe Regional Young Professionals, South Lake Tahoe Economic Development Task Force, and the 2014 Leadership Lake Tahoe class.

Why are you running for City Council?: It’s time for a new generation to be represented in City Council. I’m running to be a voice for everyone in South Lake Tahoe, including the young homeowners, business owners and professionals who see a future in South Lake Tahoe.

Why should people vote for you over the other candidates?: South Lake Tahoe needs new ideas and a new perspective in its leadership. Folks can vote for three City Council candidates in the upcoming election and a vote for me is a vote for a new voice and diversified representation within the council.

What do you think is the most pressing issue in South Lake Tahoe and how will you deal with it?: Lack of vision plagues this town. It’s as if we can’t get out of our own way and any opportunity we have to improve our town is botched due to infighting. I’d like to help build consensus by balancing facts with feedback and having City Council be more present in creating public-private partnerships and work together. This town is at a crossroads; we can have “more of the same” or we can put our differences aside and move forward with improvements that make South Lake Tahoe a better place to live, work and play.

If the city cannot reach an agreement with its bargaining units, are you willing to go to impasse? Why or why not?: This is an issue for the city manager to handle, and it’s something I look forward to being debriefed on. The City Council will vote on bargaining units, but they aren’t necessarily at the bargaining table.

How would you resolve the CalPERS and health care issues in the city?: Did not respond.

What is your opinion about term limits for the council?: I stand behind term limits as a way to help the council from getting stale. It allows new council members to bring in fresh ideas to move the city forward.

If the city has positive cash flow, where should the money be spent?: Positive cash flow should be reinvested in the community by way of infrastructure that supports our environment like gutters and streets, and enhances public safety like sidewalks and bike paths. But we should also consider shovel-ready projects that provide immediate improvements in our built environment, access to recreation and create jobs.

What are your ideas for increasing the city’s revenues?: I have a sales and marketing background, so I can tell you that to increase revenue, you have to increase business. How do you increase business? By developing your product and reaching new markets. By improving South Lake Tahoe’s built environment and offering new amenities we’ll attract better spending visitors and stand out against the competition. Let’s not just go for “more” business – let’s go for “smarter” business to drive revenue from our tourism industry.

What is your vision for the 56-acre project?: The 56-acre project is an opportunity for South Lake Tahoe to positively position itself as a recreation destination. Improving the recreation center’s facility and programs will help residents and visitors alike. Highway 50 is the main corridor through South Lake Tahoe, but only a short stretch runs along the lake. We need to capitalize on this portion and make this into a community hub for both residents and visitors.

What would you do to improve relations with El Dorado County?: Are you referencing the El Dorado County government or the unincorporated area of Meyers within El Dorado County? I think the answer is the same for both: we need to have two-way communication with the government and citizens. Citizens of Meyers cannot vote in the city, but they are a part of our South Lake community, with the same schools, roads, and businesses. I look forward to working with El Dorado County as well; I’ve had brief conversations with both Kenny Curtzwiler and Sue Novasel regarding our mutual campaigns and what it would mean to work together. By listening to their needs and having them listen to the city’s needs a mutual understanding should be reached. We may not always agree, but at least we’ll understand where each other is coming from.

Is the city on the right course with restructuring debt and focusing on recreation? Why or why not?: The city is on track for focusing on recreation, with the Planning Commission and recreation plan building momentum. The city is maintaining transparency and giving residents the opportunity to give their feedback by conducting email surveys and public workshops. There seems to be a high level of collaboration, too, with recent projects like the Tahoe Valley Area Plan integrating bike paths and parks to continue in the direction of recreation. I think the OpenGov.com website that the city is now a part of is a huge step forward in transparency. If you want to see the money that comes into and out of the city coffers, this is the best place to start.

Name one vote the City Council made in the last four years you are proud of and one you are disappointed in – and why?: Proud of: I commend the City Council for voting for the Harrison Avenue Project, and working to implement this public-private partnership that helps our town visually, economically and environmentally.

Disappointed in: I was disappointed to see our elected officials vote to delay the plastic bag ban’s second phase despite overwhelming support for the initiative from shoppers and businesses alike.

What is working in the city and what isn’t; and how would you go about changing what isn’t working?: I think we have a movement in the younger generation with people who are ready for change. Some of us moved here for the recreation lifestyle and have become involved as change agents (myself), and others have come home after starting successful careers elsewhere to help their hometown flourish (Scott Fair, Darcie Collins). I’m the face of this movement; we’re ready to lead South Lake Tahoe in the present and future.

I think what is lacking is community engagement. I think our citizens don’t feel connected to their local government for a number of reasons, it could be the transiency that is natural in a resort community, but I also think a lack of representation on the council plays into this as well. It’s hard to feel a connection to council members who say they want improved recreation and a cleaner environment when as council members they are not recreating nor voting to improve our environment. I hope to be a council member that is approachable for people of all ages, I am someone deeply committed to our environmental sustainability as this is our biggest asset, and as someone who moved here for a management position at a ski resort and the recreation opportunities in our community I feel I have a better understanding of where we need to invest in first to make life better for residents and visitors alike. I want to connect with the community by making myself available at community events like Live at Lakeview, the Stand Up Paddleboard Series, or chats at local coffee shops in the winter. I may not always agree with every opinion I hear, but making yourself available is key to an inclusive government.

Being on the council requires working with four others. Give readers an example of how you work well others in difficult situations with differing opinions: Leadership Lake Tahoe’s class of 2014 was tasked with putting on a summit as our class project. There were no real parameters given, no budget to start with, only a hierarchal framework. I was elected to be the co-chair of our summit and we set our sights on pulling off a large-scale summit. There were lots of differing opinions on what type of event to put on, how to raise funds, and who to invite as speakers for our panels and keynotes. These decisions were all made through consensus building and getting the class to buy-in to the vision so they felt they were a part of the overall decision making process.

I define leadership as someone who knows the way, shows the way, and goes the way. John Rice at Sierra-at-Tahoe is the best leader I’ve ever worked for and I use him as my leadership model. We believe in his leadership skills, he invites us to share his vision for the future, and then John actively leads us to our destination.

What is your opinion about the following topics:

• Ferry service on Lake Tahoe?: Ferry service on Lake Tahoe would decrease pollution by reducing emissions, and would allow us to increase visitation to the South Shore. A ferry system would create new, high paying jobs as well. So long as the boats had a moderate impact on the environment, I support a ferry service on Lake Tahoe.

• Loop road?: The Loop Road is a sensitive subject for many people in our city due to the issues arising from other development projects such as the Chateau project. The city has lost trust with some citizens in our community because of how past projects were handled. Yet I believe that we need to create a walkable downtown area for our residents and visitors. The majority of the city’s budget comes from TOT and visitors’ sales tax revenue. Our tourism economy needs to adapt to what visitors want and we also need to embrace a future that doesn’t rely on the automobile for your shopping experience. We are a ways off with green-lighting a project like the Loop Road due to many issues outside of the city’s control (Caltrans, an environmental impact report, etc.) but I hope to be on the council to bring in all sides the Loop Road conversation and hopefully we’ll move forward in a sensible fashion.

• Future of Lake Tahoe Airport?: The Lake Tahoe Airport is South Lake Tahoe’s largest polluter, next to the Tahoe Keys. If it’s going to exist, it should be to serve the greater good of the community. I’d like to see the airport redeveloped to bring in revenue to fund infrastructure and public safety.

• Increasing the transient occupancy tax?: I’m staunchly against increasing South Lake Tahoe’s transient occupancy tax. Our TOT rates are higher than San Diego, Monterey and Palm Springs – all of which are thriving destinations with higher occupancy rates and a more vibrant tourism economy. A failing hotel doesn’t raise rates to bring in more revenue; they work on improving the property to generate the traffic necessary for a successful business. Instead of increasing TOT, let’s grow our cash flow by improving South Lake Tahoe’s recreation offerings and bringing in better spending visitors.

Changing the vacation rental ordinance to reduce the number of such units in neighborhoods?: A balance needs to be struck in the amount of vacation rentals and non-primary residences and the number of full-time residents that live, work and play in South Lake Tahoe. Vacation rentals are a reality of South Lake Tahoe and generate transient occupancy tax that benefits the city of South Lake Tahoe. But when our town is made up of mostly non-permanent residents, vacation rentals can quickly take over a neighborhood. I look forward to reviewing the ordinance to see if a sensible balance can be achieved.

Your civic involvement is lacking, why should the public believe you have what it takes to step onto the City Council?: Civic engagement is defined as individual and collective actions designed to identify and address issues of public concern. My life in Tahoe is dedicated to addressing public concern – whether working to bring more skiers to our slopes and putting heads in beds, volunteer at community clean ups or lead the charge in the creation of the Elevate Your View summit last spring, which addressed community apathy. My lack of experience as an elected politician is exactly why people should vote for me – our town needs new blood and fresh ideas within City Council. I’m not a career politician; I’m a homeowner who wants to create a future here for my family and everyone else.

Tell the voters something about yourself that they may not know: I came to South Lake Tahoe as a child once every winter to toboggan and saucer on the local hills and those trips to my aunt’s cabin are the foundation for my love of South Lake Tahoe. My wife and I left Tahoe for two years and were eager to return to South Lake Tahoe to help this community move forward. Service also runs deep in my family. My two male role models growing up served their communities in different ways. My maternal grandfather was a CTA representative who helped his fellow teachers negotiate for fair wages and compensation, sometimes working past midnight on projects after putting his five children to bed. My father was a union representative at a paint factory in the Bay Area representing over 50 coworkers. I come from humble roots, my father’s side of the family is from Mexico, and I’m proud of my grandparents for coming to the California to make a better life for themselves and their family. I think of myself at the epitome of the American Dream when seen through their eyes, I’ve achieved more than I ever thought I could in my life and I look forward to a progressive future for South Lake Tahoe.

image_pdfimage_print

About author

This article was written by admin

Comments

Comments (36)
  1. Ted says - Posted: September 2, 2014

    Good luck…

  2. Arod says - Posted: September 2, 2014

    I thought the Tahoe Young Professionals had no political aspirations. At least that is what they have claimed in the past. I guess we know the truth now.
    Son, you are not ready for prime time.

  3. tahoeadvocate says - Posted: September 2, 2014

    Why wouldn’t a person state their work experience?

  4. rebel with a cause says - Posted: September 2, 2014

    Hopefully, there will be some candidates forums to learn more about Matt. Thank you for being involved in the community. Please let us know more about your work experience.

    It is certainly time to say good-bye to Tom Davis.

  5. reloman says - Posted: September 2, 2014

    just because a person belongs to a organization does that means they can no longer run for a office, watch out boys and girls club, elks, veterans posts, churches, or any other service organiztions, your members just lost their civil rights

  6. Jenna Sierra says - Posted: September 2, 2014

    Arod, the Tahoe Regional Young Professionals is a politically neutral organization. TRYP wants its members to get engaged with local politics and make their own informed decisions, whether it’s a decision to run for office or a decision to register and vote. You can learn more about TRYP’s Civic Engagement program here: http://www.tahoetryp.org/member-benefits/civic-engagement/

    And by the way, TRYP is thrilled to see its members running for office. Matt’s ready for prime time, let’s see if prime time is ready for Matt!

  7. Matt Palacio says - Posted: September 2, 2014

    I realize now that I left the work experience blank when answering these questions. I’ve spent over six seasons in ski resort sales here in Tahoe, and currently run the sales department at Sierra-at-Tahoe Resort as its Senior Sales Manager.

  8. Arod says - Posted: September 2, 2014

    Your words do not align with your actions.

  9. Tahoe Voter says - Posted: September 2, 2014

    Arod – I don’t understand why you’re talking about the Young Professionals as if Matt represents them… they are only mentioned once in this entire article. Geez, I would hope they encourage their members to get more involved in the community!

    And why do you address Matt as “son”? That is awfully condescending. If that’s the path we’re taking on these comments, I would venture to guess that you are an older local who fears youth in charge will make mistakes. Understandable because youth are admittedly quite vocal and could lack wisdom that comes with age, but it seems to me like Matt is perfectly clear that he will be a part of a TEAM. We need a young perspective here. We need innovation, energy and passion. I don’t know if Matt has those, but so far he appears to more so than any of the other candidates.

  10. Biggerpicture says - Posted: September 2, 2014

    Arod, I’m pretty sure many council members in the past have belonged to the Kiwanis, Optimist, and other service organizations. Does that make those organizations political as well?

  11. observer says - Posted: September 2, 2014

    I am all for the City Council getting some new younger blood on it, but several of Palacio’s remarks were difficult to put in a current context.

    His reluctance to elaborate on his work experience is likely to be a fatal flaw in many peoples eyes. Mine in particular. We need to know what he has done, not what his parents and grand parents have done. He said he moved here for a management position at a ski resort, but did not mention if he is really doing that. Sierra ski Resort is actually NOT in the Tahoe basin. What does he do?

    I would also like to know the source of Mr. Palacio’s information about the two greatest polluters in Lake Tahoe.

    The airport has so little air traffic these days that it could hardly be called one of the two biggest polluters except by its detractors. The city and other agency vehicle fleets probably are one of the top air polluters that actually live in Tahoe as opposed to a barely used airport. The airport also has significant additional light industrial opportunity, as many other cities have demonstrated.

    The airport has a place in Tahoe if for nothing else than public safety and a fire fighting base.
    Toward that end I would like to see a permanent air tanker facility in place in Tahoe that could be used immediately when the next big blaze comes. And we know it will, probably started by a tourist.

    The Tahoe Keys, taken as a group of 1500 odd home units doesn’t pollute any more than any other home area, maybe less, as there is little erosion into the lake from this flat area, as opposed to, say, Montgomery Estates, or the kingsbury subdivisions built on steep, eroding slopes.

    Yes, I know the invasive weeds are indeed a problem, but if Lahontan will ever get off their duffs and approve herbicides it can be well controlled, even eradicated with existing EPA approved products.

    Overall, this sounds like a wanna be politician looking for off the cuff remarks he believes people will respond to and vote for. He hit all the current buzz words; built environment,environment, environmental, recreation, walkable, sustainable, bike paths, big spenders etc, etc.

    He obviously believes South Lake Tahoe’s “downtown” is the California side of the hotel Strip. What does he think about the other six or so miles of the City?

    Did he really say “when our town is made up of mostly non-permanent residents, vacation rentals can quickly take over a neighborhood”?

    My conclusion is that this candidate is inexperienced and a little narrowly focused on his form of recreation, and is not paying enough attention to the significant number of people who retired in Lake Tahoe and do not necessarily recreate as he does and are definitely permanent residents.

    I think they have money, and they vote too.

    It is time to run our town for the true permanent residents, and not design and run it for the tourists.

    The forth of July and the mess made on the beaches, for a recent example does not make me want to spend too much time planning the entire city to cater to these people.

    The city may make a bundle on TOT, but the seasonal minimum wage jobs tourist activities create do not result in a livable economy for most of the workers in the tourism industry.

    Fix this, then we can talk.

  12. Gaspen Aspen says - Posted: September 2, 2014

    He is just another want to be politician and we know politicians can not be trusted.

  13. Parker says - Posted: September 2, 2014

    Disagree, or rather, would like some elaboration on the Airport being a big polluter?

    And you know while I’ve heavily criticized politicos on this site, I later elaborated that running & serving does take a lot of time and effort!

    Haven’t decided if I’ll vote for Matt? But I do know Matt is a good person whose motivation is to do good for the town! (Just not sure if I’m in favor of the same things he is?)

    But as we start to get these Council statements on this site, there’s no need to always look at those running with such a cynical eye. And that’s certainly not true in Matt’s case!

  14. Dogula says - Posted: September 2, 2014

    Too many ‘progressive’ buzzwords, too much evasive language on the tough questions. Definitely a politician in the making. NOT what town needs.

  15. Lyndsay Bryant says - Posted: September 2, 2014

    Arod, please reach out to the Tahoe Regional Young Professionals so that they may understand why you made the comment “your words do not align with your actions.” They do not take a political stance on any issue nor endorse any candidates. They do provide information about civic engagement and highly encourage members to get informed and vote.

    I would hope that, whether or not you agree with Matt, more people can look at his running for City Council as a positive. The youth in this community are getting involved, care, and are making a difference. That is positive change I hope this entire community can get behind.

  16. LeanForward says - Posted: September 2, 2014

    What this town needs is fresh blood. Hear that? It’s the sound of change. With out it, we will go nowhere.

    Matt, to you I say this…It takes an incredible amount of courage to open your self up to the ridicule of the public. I commend you for taking a chance and trying to make the city you love better.

    You will get my vote.

  17. TeaTotal says - Posted: September 2, 2014

    dogula ‘buzzwords’=Me Me Me- Mine Mine Mine-everyone else can die

  18. 432 year local 6th generation says - Posted: September 2, 2014

    Having been born and raised here in South Lake Tahoe, understanding our history and past mistakes, and knowing Matt personally; Matt is exactly what this town needs. It’s time we move forward from the negative energy and naysayers which has built from the vision and decisions made over the last forty+ years and move to a generation focused on what Tahoe really is: Mountains, Lake, Recreation and family oriented youth. It’s also very important to get leaders elected who understand the social and cultural changes taking shape around us. The world is changing, Tahoe is changing, and let’s elect leaders who understand these cultural changes. ITS TIME FOR MATT PALACIO. Let’s make this a true mountain town.

  19. Parker says - Posted: September 2, 2014

    I don’t know if I was clear in my last couple sentences? So let me rephrase: You don’t need to look all those running with such a cynical eye. And you certainly don’t need to in Matt’s case!

  20. Dogula says - Posted: September 2, 2014

    Teatotal? Where did you see those words? Why can’t you address the issue instead of ALWAYS attacking posters whose views are not in lockstep with your own?

  21. baphomet says - Posted: September 2, 2014

    hey. let’s just go with it. see what happens. “primetime”? what does this
    “primetime” have to do with “tahoe south”?

  22. Old Long Skiis says - Posted: September 2, 2014

    432 year local 6th generation, I don’t know what to make of Matt Palacio just yet, but I am impressed by your lineage! 432 years in Tahoe Is a VERY long time!
    Our paths must of crossed a few times over the years so I’m looking forward to meeting you and talking about all things going on locally. OLS

  23. Tait says - Posted: September 2, 2014

    Creating a visually appealing and well functioning mountain town is exactly what is needed for Tahoe, and will improve the quality of life for recreators and non-recreators alike.  Anyone who has ever been to well planned mountain communities like Park City, Telluride, and Aspen will agree with me.  If South Lake Tahoe had visionaries like Matt 40 years ago Tahoe South would be world class instead of trying to play catch-up.  Prime time? Don’t make me laugh. We aren’t there yet. Matt’s going to be the one who takes us to prime time.

  24. go figure says - Posted: September 2, 2014

    Teatotal, dogzilla is such a whiner and you were spot on. Kudos to you

    Matt seems like a guy with motivation and courage and if he dosnt get too discouraged by all the trolls out there he might be what this town needs, a new generation of forward thinking young people who arent afraid to take on the old stuck in their rut crowd.

    Good luck Matt

  25. mrs.t says - Posted: September 2, 2014

    Thank you Matt for clarifying your work experience. I look forward to reading all the candidate’s responses before making an informed vote this fall. This city really does need new blood, whether it is a younger person like Matt or someone older. The “good old boys” network has got to go.

  26. 432 year local 6th generation says - Posted: September 2, 2014

    OLS yes thank you for noticing my lineage and yes our paths have crossed. I’m hoping that with the pun in my name that we as a community can open our minds and truly judge him by the ideas he brings to the discussion. I know he loves our community, will raise his family here, sees us as a mountain town, and has a vision that we really need. I give him all the respect in the world for throwing his hat in the ring, making his name public, and I think we as a community owe him the same. Best of luck Matt and we’re here to support and vote.

  27. Victoria Lynn says - Posted: September 2, 2014

    Tait, i couldn’t have said it better!
    Matt is so passionate about improving our town, not a ‘wanna be politician’.
    That’s why i TRUST him with my vote.

  28. Sliced says - Posted: September 3, 2014

    If we can’t embrace the new, can we at least go way old school? Can we just give it all back to the Natives Americans yet? They actually gave a darn. Good luck Da O Aga.

  29. baphomet says - Posted: September 3, 2014

    some literate dude layin’ it out spawns all this usual sub-coagulate…

  30. Shannon says - Posted: September 3, 2014

    Just a quick comment for “Observer” – While all of our full time permanent residents are very much appreciated, needed, and respected, we do need to “run our town” in a way that draws in visitors. Tourism is our greatest way to economic stability, and Matt is spot on with his comment “let’s grow our cash flow by improving South Lake Tahoe’s recreation offerings and bringing in better spending visitors.” This will help to ensure that our community, including our thriving retired community, has access to services like public safety, a hospital, and improved infrastructure. Without our much needed visitors enjoying the amenities our region can offer, we will not be able to sustain an environment that encourages other retired people to relocate here. I think it might help if you consider it from that perspective.

  31. Hmmm... says - Posted: September 3, 2014

    @Tait-Telluride? Aspen? Come on. Seriously, we can’t position ourselves as another Aspen…we would have to build a homeless shelter(Homeless… what homeless?) Telluride? Well, we would need to import quaint charm and earthmuffin quirkiness-both of which are completely lacking-and a good bagel shop would be nice. And some serious mountains.

  32. Hmmm... says - Posted: September 3, 2014

    And a mayor who’s got his own reggae band…and gets busted with a pound of shrooms…

  33. Jared Manninen says - Posted: September 3, 2014

    Choosing a leader isn’t about being in total alignment with every single one of their policies or initiatives, or getting hung up on the minutia of their word choice, or whether they have extensive experience or knowledge in this or that area. It’s about putting trust and faith in a quality person who is genuinely looking out for your best interests.

    Matt Palacio is as honest, intelligent, and selfless as any person I’ve met. I’ve spoken with him on a number of occasions this past year and I never once got the impression that he was angling to become some sort of career politician. Rather, he seemed reluctant to throw his hat in the political ring. And for good reason… just look at some of the hate-speech leveled against him here by those who like to cast stones while hiding behind anonymous screen names. Healthy debate and discussion is one thing, but personal attacks by community members is just shameful.

    Matt is exactly the type of person who should serve in office. He possesses vision, seeks to build consensus, and is willing to put in the time and effort to get the job done. He has my support.

  34. BrianK says - Posted: September 3, 2014

    Hmmm…I too, think it would be a mistake to try to completely imitate some of the towns mentioned. I, however, do not believe that was Tait’s point. Each of those towns has become uniquely successful due to their natural beauty, tourism economies, and long term community cooperation. We would be remiss if we did not learn from their experiences to help South Lake Tahoe find an identity where visitors, residents, and businesses can benefit. With all of the Area Plans that are going through various revisions and public hearings right now, it is quite easy to make your voice heard. Seeing someone like Mr. Palacio entering the ring gives me hope that we will soon have a new generation of leadership to accompany the new generation of choices that are going to have to be made in order for South Lake Tahoe to succeed.

  35. Chief Slowroller says - Posted: September 3, 2014

    I spoke with Matt last week at the Thursday night concert.

    I don’t think he is ready for the way the town is run, the folks behind the curtain will chew him up and spit him out.

    besides you have to be in the Good ol Boy club to get on the City Council.

  36. Jason Collin says - Posted: September 4, 2014

    Most Importantly, if you speak behind an alias your voice is worthless. Own your voice or stay out of the conversation.

    Matt, thanks for doing something. I don’t need to agree with 100% of your views to appreciate the vigor in which you want this community to realize itself. This is what the community wants. This is what we desperately need.

    The comments insulting tourists and invalidating the impact of tourism are absurd. 80% of us wouldn’t be here without tourists. Stop being jerks to them and go hug one. Do it. Tell them you’re sorry for being a jerk and give them a big bear hug. Tahoe style.

    “observer”, did you really questioned that Sierra-at-Tahoe is not part of the South Shore community? How long have you been here? I’m sure you shared no joy in all of the Olympians that came out of Sierra-at-Tahoe because it’s “not in the basin”.

    Matt, thank you too for having vision. Thank you for having the guts to step up. There is no shame in being a politician when you are listening to the majority and vying for a prosperous and sustainable South Shore. Keep up the good fight.